March 09, 2010
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
White Papers
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Dear Fast Feeders, Please Keep Your Meat Away From the Ladies

Sexualized Sandwich Bits Are Getting Tired, Disgusting

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

There was a time where if you wanted overtly sexualized or misogynistic advertising (I'm looking at you Bacardi), you had to turn to the liquor ads in Maxim or Playboy, or Calvin Klein ads -- well, just about anywhere. But this ongoing trend of centering sex jokes around sandwiches filled with meats of mysterious origin is getting to be a bit much.

Why, just look at this disgusting effort from Burger King, which not only includes a reference to the length of the meat-filled sandwich, but also features the word "blow" and the wide open, red-ringed mouth of a shocked young lady. Makes me wonder why they didn't go with 9 inches as a tribute to Alex Bogusky's diet book. Perhaps 7 inches was cheaper and had the added benefit of not making the target audience feel like it didn't ... wait for it ... measure up. (Actually, according to Burger King, the ad wasn't created by Crispin Porter & Bogusky. UPDATE: According to BK, "this advertisement is running to support a limited promotion in the Singapore market and is not running in the U.S. or any other markets." Which totally makes it all OK, then!)

I can't decide whether I find this more or less disgusting and off-putting than the Quiznos "Toasty Torpedo" effort, in which the oven asks the young Quiznos staffer to "put it in me." This comes 10 seconds after the young man makes passing reference to not doing something again because "that burned."

Things have gotten so out of hand in the category -- and Quiznos ads are typically so bad -- that most people assumed an online video featuring porn actresses reenacting "Two Girls and a Cup" with a Quiznos sub was actually a legit ad effort from the marketer. (It was, in fact, a Playboy spoof.)

Carl's Jr. and Hardee's, meanwhile, aren't going to take a sloppy second place in this race. Oh no. The folks who somehow thought it would be a good idea to conjure up images of STDs in their commercials by featuring Paris Hilton are now taking a sort of "Girls Gone Wild" approach. After the chain's latest efforts -- including Padma Lakshmi making her Hindu forebears cry (though, I'll admit, I loved that ad for all the very same reasons I'm complaining about here), dim-bulb "actress" Audrina Patridge eating a Teriyaki burger on the beach, and a YouTube celebrity stunt -- it is now giving young women across the country a chance to get half nekkid and defile themselves as part of a fast-food marketing stunt. The poor man's Megan Fox featured on the company's Hot Chicks Eating Burgers promo can fill you in on the details. In short, ladies, lick sauce off your fingers while making eyes at the camera and you could win a whole $1,000 and a trip for two to Vegas and a chance (just a chance, mind you) to participate in an upcoming Carl's Jr. or Hardee's marketing campaign.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if the winner were allowed to participate ... as a key grip?

Anyway, just my way of saying, look guys, we get it. And maybe this is helping sales with the crowd that hoses down in Axe body spray before leaving the house. But these are not two great tastes that taste great together.

A sandwich is just a sandwich, so quit trying so hard to make it a penis.

UPDATE: Hardee's ups the ante with a "Name Our Holes" campaign.

18 Comments
Sort by Date | Popularity
Subscribe to comments on: Dear Fast Feeders, Please Keep Your Meat Away From the Ladies
  By Agency of One | New York, NY June 24, 2009 12:54:12 pm:
As was reported in Ad Age earlier, Burger King market share has continually lost ground to McDonald's. And nothing they do seems to change that. McDonald's owns "family." Burger King as tried with the Kids Club, etc. They have tried to be the poor(er) man's McDonald's, and it didn't work. They have tried be subversive. They have tried to embody the ethos of the angry, lonely man. Maybe they are finally getting it. Maybe the only way for Burger King to survive is to become a Rated-R (or at least PG-13) fast-feeder. Maybe they should offend everyone, especially women, and men afraid of blowjob imagery. If they focus on an extremely tight target audience, and that target audience is the largest consumer of fast food, then I think it is a smart business decision to alienate the rest of the world. On the other hand, I am not sure how many men want to order and eat a sandwich that is dick-like. So they may want to come up with more pocket-based food items.
  By editorAdAge | New York, NY June 24, 2009 01:03:36 pm:
On the BK front, let's not attribute this sort of thing to losses "against" McDonald's. Firstly, while McDonald's is obviously going to win market-share wars, BK has been seeing increased sales over the past 10 years AND it regained it's No. 2 spot. And that's largely in part to sticking with both a game plan and its agency, Crispin.

Weirdly, this ad is not from Crispin. Perhaps that's why it's got such a low-rent feel to it.

--Ken Wheaton
  By RICH | CUPERTINO, CA June 25, 2009 08:40:15 am:
So who was the creative? Was it a local shop in Singapore?
  By Jinglegiant | Joplin, MO June 25, 2009 09:15:56 am:
It makes me wonder how much of this is targeting and how much is stunting. Brings to mind the recent Calvin Klein billboard that upset enough people to make it to the major news shows. While I do think that blow jobs and fast food have no business doing business, we are talking about it. Buzz generated. Mission accomplished.

Hold the pickle.
  By mheard | WASHINGTON, DC June 25, 2009 09:18:54 am:
All I have to say is amen to that. You said a mouthful - pun intended.
  By Brian | Naperville, IL June 25, 2009 09:31:51 am:
Sad, tasteless advertising that utterly fails in creativity and in differentiating the brand...as proven by all the copycatting going on by fast food marketers. And BK's comment that "this advertisement is running to support a limited promotion in the Singapore market and is not running in the U.S. or any other markets" is breathtaking in its naïveté (Psst: "Hey, let's just run the smut ad in Singapore, all the prudes in the rest of the world will never know").

BK doesn't need buzz from controversial ads -- is someone going to argue that tactic actually sells sandwiches? They aren't some niche brand no one's ever heard of.
  By tralala37 | chicago, IL June 25, 2009 10:47:27 am:
Subway's $5 Footlong spots anyone? The first spot featured a cop, an airline hostess and a weather girl (insert your favorite porn tune here), not to mention Godzilla crushing all in his path, accompanied by the Subway blimp, no less. He stops dead only when an Asian girl holds her hands a foot apart and exclaims "$5 footlong!". Godzilla looks pretty darn excited to show her he knows exactly what she's looking for, if you know what I'm saying. *wink wink* It's veiled, but it's there.
  By Jocelyn | Austin, TX June 25, 2009 10:59:16 am:
instant gratification...

people approach the "easy girl, sitting at the bar" for a reason. there will always be those who prefer one night stands over marriage, but which individual will be more loyal, in the long run?
  By awrb84 | Gainesville, FL June 25, 2009 03:53:51 pm:
@tralala37,

You might be reaching a bit for the $5 footlong phallic reference. Thing is most penises (to be pc) are no where near a foot long, even in porn. Seven inches is kind of the magic number, which is why this ad uses the "super seven incher" reference. Not to mention the obvious blow reference. I think Subway has done a very good job with avoiding the phallic backlash with the $5 footlong ads, by keeping the copy far away from any sexual innuendo.
  By Linda | DALLAS, TX June 25, 2009 04:13:06 pm:
Aw C'mon. I'm a average, middle-aged woman and I've never associated BK or Subway sandwiches with a sexual object. However, bananas and hot dogs are to me much more suggestive. Should we R-rate them? Let's get on Chiquita and Oscar Mayer to change the shape of these products. After all, they are often in the hands of children. Sarcasm intended.
  By MattK | San Diego, CA June 25, 2009 05:15:41 pm:
@Jocelyn

I totally agree. Anyone lustfully tempted by this type of advertising cannot and will not be a loyal customer. They will probably be the type to use a brand or product one day, and just move on to another. Wouldn't it be ideal if, as consumers, we made our brand choices and faithfully adhered to them? Til death do us part? I, for one, believe it unnecessary to court such brand adulterers and am glad someone has spoken out against this! Unfortunately some would say it's ridiculous to compare consumer behavior and advertising with courtship behavior and marriage...
  By Jocelyn | Austin, TX June 25, 2009 05:35:36 pm:
@ MattK



I personally think that advertising can successfully, and pretty accurately, be compared to dating/courtship behavior.

The conversation between brands and customers is similar and familiar...

The brand starts off in the "single" relationship status. The brand notices a customer, tries to get her attention, and asks her on a date. On that first date, the customer and brand get to know each other, all while the brand tries to impress the customer. If all goes well, the brand and customer become "official."

(Otherwise, it ends there. Think Snuggie.)

After a few amazing dates, the brand hints to the customer that it is ready to answer the question, "Will you marry me?"

When the customer finally pops that question, the brand ecstatically and joyfully says yes, and the relationship becomes one that is forever faithful. Think apple.

(Otherwise, the customer breaks up with the brand, and the brand tries to find someone else, or goes into a deep depression.)
  By Jocelyn | Austin, TX June 25, 2009 05:40:26 pm:
@ MattK

My e-high five didn't show up in my previous post. Here it is **high five**
  By MattK | San Diego, CA June 25, 2009 05:57:22 pm:
@Jocelyn

I believe, especially in this economy, the consumer must maintain a "what have you done for me lately?" attitude. No matter how amazing that first date was, a brand/product has to be judged on your most recent rendezvous. So you've been with McDonald's for years now? If a good looking Carl's Jr. catches your eye, I believe the consumer can give them a shot, no strings attached, without facing judgment. That is the job of advertising, to catch the ever-curious eye of the consumer, which these campaigns do.

Furthermore, as long as we're all adults, a one time Snuggie never hurt anyone. But, this is coming from a guy who uses an iPhone, yet can't commit to a Mac computer.
  By Jocelyn | Austin, TX June 25, 2009 06:19:40 pm:
Yes - very true, MattK!!

Loving the string of comments on this article. :)
  By BL | NEW YORK, NY June 27, 2009 01:21:47 pm:
I wrote a post on What's Next Blog in may, "The Slightly Salacious, and Semi-Disgusting, Trend in Fast Food Advertising" http://bit.ly/aLy0D and am both amazed and grossed out to see the trend continue. Blecch! Feh!

The problem for the brands in this fast food echo chamber is that you can't tell one disgusting fast food ad from another.
  By benbrown | Montreal, QC July 2, 2009 12:24:58 pm:
They literally just covered the same thing over at Conversational Capital. It's interesting that everyone is mutually barfing at these ads.

Check it out here: http://conversationalcapital.com/category/authors_posts/
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News