Speculation surged last week that Michael Bloomberg, New York's billionaire mayor and founder of Bloomberg LP, might buy The Financial Times, after The New York Times reported he'd been thinking about it. The paper's not for sale, but the report begged a related question: Should smart businesspeople be buying newspapers in 2013?
Despite all the talk about newspapers being a dying business, plenty of them are profitable. That includes the FT, according to Ian Whittaker, a media analyst at Liberum Capital in London, who isn't convinced it will go on the block. The paper and its digital operations probably have an annual profit equivalent to some $32 million, he estimated. Considering annual revenue he pegged at perhaps $596 million to $611 million, that 's a relatively low-margin business. And the paper's owner, Pearson, has been investing heavily in the education sector, which has the added allure of expected growth. But even a relatively small profit might be enough to make the paper, with its international reach and affluent audience, desirable to Mr. Bloomberg. It may just as easily help Pearson justify keeping it.
What about other newspapers of note? Recent history shows that profits are hardly necessary for a sale if the buyer's motivation and the price are right. Russian oligarch Alexander Lebedev bought the U.K.'s money-losing Independent and Independent on Sunday in 2010 for the price of one day's newspaper. Some papers, however, have even more to offer. We took a look at some.