×

Once registered, you can:

  • - Read additional free articles each month
  • - Comment on articles and featured creative work
  • - Get our curated newsletters delivered to your inbox

By registering you agree to our privacy policy, terms & conditions and to receive occasional emails from Ad Age. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account.

Ad fund case to Supreme Court

Published on .

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a California case that could indicate whether the government has the right to collect advertising dollars as a tax from agricultural growers. While similar taxes support major national campaigns for milk, beef and orange advertising, among others, the court challenge involves advertising for California peaches, nectarines and plums.

Several California growers in 1987 began withholding the advertising assessments they had been paying the U.S. Department of Agriculture and that normally fund state-sponsored industry marketing campaigns. The growers contended the assessments violated their freedom of speech. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the growers.

Most Popular
In this article: