×

Once registered, you can:

  • - Read additional free articles each month
  • - Comment on articles and featured creative work
  • - Get our curated newsletters delivered to your inbox

By registering you agree to our privacy policy, terms & conditions and to receive occasional emails from Ad Age. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account.

BENDING THE RULES FOR BETTER REACH

By Published on .

In the decision between flighting or continuity, continuity wins every time, contends Erwin Ephron, a partner at the marketing consultancy Ephron, Papazian & Ephron, and a proponent of continual frequency media scheduling.

The reason, he says, is because the reach curve flattens at higher gross rating point levels.

Thus, a brand can be advertised for more weeks.

In the hypothetical example below, reducing GRPs by one-third, from 100 to 67, reduces reach by only one-fifth, from 50 to 40.

With fewer dollars needed to buy those GRPs per week, a marketer can stay in media for a longer time.

"You can achieve a greater total effect by reducing the weight and running more weeks," he says.

Most Popular
In this article: