The brief argues that the CDA is overly broad in violation of the First Amendment because it criminalizes all manner of protected speech, ranging from discussions of safe sex to popular art. Readers can move from citations to documents in the appendix, with hyperlinks directly to Web sites. The illustrations include material that may be criminalized under the CDA.
"We wanted the Court to be able to review the matter in cyberspace to fully appreciate the medium Congress is attempting to regulate," said Carl A. Solano, a First Amendment attorney and one of the authors of the brief. The brief is available to the public at the firm's Web site.
Copyright February 1997, Crain Communications Inc.