DETROIT (AdAge.com) -- Amid the launch of the third-generation Prius hybrid, Toyota is taking a beating online and in court by owners who charge that some older models of the popular car have faulty headlights that can cost more than $1,000 to replace.
The complaints began online as early as August 2006, according to a scan of chat rooms and owner forums by Advertising Age. Owners are upset that their warranties don't cover the HID bulbs, which can cost between $300 and $1,800 -- with labor -- to replace all or part of the light system.
Feds query carmaker
An arm of the U.S. Transportation Department opened a "preliminary evaluation" into the matter in late April after getting 338 complaints and took the next step by asking Toyota about the matter in a letter dated May 13, a spokesman for the carmaker said. Toyota is complying with the request, he said.
Owners on the online forums encouraged other Prius owners experiencing the headlamp problem to report it to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which did not return calls by deadline. If NHTSA finds that the headlamps pose a safety threat, it can order Toyota to recall them and replace them at no cost to Prius owners.
Toyota is cooperating with NHTSA and is required to provide the information at the end of the month, the spokesman said. He said Toyota is also looking into its other models equipped with upper-end HID lights and referred owners to the customer-service line at 800-331-4331. He added that some of the owners' complaints have come after their warranty expired, which makes them responsible for repairs.
A second Toyota spokesman said, "We have seen the complaints and are looking into it."
Meanwhile, Toyota will need to respond soon to a lawsuit filed last month by Girard Gibbs in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on behalf of a Putnam County, N.Y., Prius owner that seeks class-action status. According to the complaint, "Toyota is concealing the problems from owners" even though the automaker has "long been aware of Prius' HID headlight problem," which the suit calls a "dangerous but undisclosed safety defect."
Partner Eric Gibbs said his San Francisco firm has been contacted by hundreds of people experiencing faulty HID headlights on the Prius. He said the defect seems most prevalent in 2006 and 2007 models, although the firm is also looking at 2008 and 2005 models.
Bryan Rupp, owner of a 2006-model Prius, wrote on an owner forum that his dealer quoted him a price of $1,726 to replace both HID headlights and two related computers. "I talked to Toyota customer relations (800-331-4331) today and they offered to pay for the parts, about $1,350, and asked me to pay the labor cost of $400," he wrote. He complained that the company wanted him to pay for it up front and reimburse him after four to six weeks. He wrote: "I do not think I should pay a dime. This sounds like it should be a recall."
In an interview, Mr. Rupp said he ultimately was reimbursed for the parts portion of the repair but is still out about $450, the cost of labor that Toyota would not cover.
The timing couldn't be worse for the car that has built Toyota's image as the nation's most eco-friendly carmaker. Toyota is now launching its third-generation Prius, a 2010 model, with a glitzy, integrated ad campaign that includes a heavy national TV rotation. Two launch TV spots from Publicis Groupe's Saatchi & Saatchi Los Angeles, in Torrance, Calif., are running. They ranked first and third in the top 10 most-liked and most-recalled new TV commercials in May, according to Nielsen IAG Research.
Experts said the situation doesn't have the makings of a crisis for Toyota, but indicated it could pose a problem because Prius is the one model in Toyota's lineup apt to be sold to "sensitive people with a clear sense of right and wrong and their obligation to society," said Andy Fletcher, president-CEO of marketing communications firm Fletcher-Martin, Atlanta. "This is the wrong group to mess with, particularly now."
Attracting potential buyers
Americans are evaluating all their brand choices during this recession and are more apt to change brands, especially automobiles, given the woes of General Motors Corp. and Chrysler. "The danger to Toyota is the effect on Prius owners and non-Toyota owners, many of whom are starting to evaluate why they weren't a Toyota owner before," Mr. Fletcher said. This issue could dissuade buyers who were considering switching to Toyota.
Toyota has somewhat of a track record for dragging its heels on similar issues, such as the engine sludge problem in the Camry earlier this decade, said Peter DeLorenzo, founder of blog Autoextremist.com and a former auto creative at several ad agencies. "If Toyota moves quickly, the whole thing will blow over," he said. But if not, there will be "ill will" among owners because "word-of-mouth is still the most powerful form of advertising," he said.
Todd Turner, president of consultant CarConcepts, recommended Toyota issue a so-called technical service bulletin on the car's HID headlamps and extend the car's warranty. That bulletin to owners would instruct them to bring their cars into dealers so Toyota could replace the parts and study them for a suspected problem. "That's a smart way to turn it around" and keep owners happy, he said. Otherwise, he said, Toyota could lose these owners forever.
That's the sentiment of Prius owner Terry Wehrman, who wrote on HybridCars.com almost nine months ago that he has owned six different Toyotas in his life -- he still drives a 1991 Celica with 210,00 miles on it -- and bought a 2006-model Prius for his wife.
"If I had known of this [Prius] headlight issue and the cost for a headlight, I would never have purchased the car," he wrote. "This light problem should be a recall issue by Toyota. If the problem is not resolved, as much as I like Toyotas, I will never buy another one."