Once registered, you can:

  • - Read additional free articles each month
  • - Comment on articles and featured creative work
  • - Get our curated newsletters delivered to your inbox

By registering you agree to our privacy policy, terms & conditions and to receive occasional emails from Ad Age. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account.

NAD faults P&G Secret/Sure ads

Published on .

Procter & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, lacked adequate substantiation for superior effectiveness claims made in ads for its Secret Sheer Dry and Sure Sheer Dry antiperspirant and deodorant products, according to a decision from the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, New York. NAD said P&G agreed to halt such superiority claims until it has evidence that establishes a "reasonable basis" for the claims. The ads were challenged by Gillette Co. P&G said it was "disappointed" NAD did not accept its supporting evidence. It said its "planned use of efficacy claims has already expired and P&G's current advertising fully complied with NAD's decision." Grey Advertising, New York, and Leo Burnett USA, Chicago, handle.

Copyright June 1998, Crain Communications Inc.

Most Popular
In this article: