×

Once registered, you can:

  • - Read additional free articles each month
  • - Comment on articles and featured creative work
  • - Get our curated newsletters delivered to your inbox

By registering you agree to our privacy policy, terms & conditions and to receive occasional emails from Ad Age. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account.

But will it snag the biz?

By Published on .

Agency.com's viral video was roundly panned, furiously so in some cases, in the advertising blogosphere. But as with any review process, the only opinion that matters is the marketer's. So what did Subway think?

"Whether I wanted it voiced to the world that I was doing this pitch, not necessarily," said Ted Wirth, director-creative services for Subway Restaurants. "That kind of a took me aback a bit but what's done is done. I don't know who got more attention, Subway or the agency."

Mr. Wirth said the process started about a month ago, when Subway contacted 15 agencies. The sandwich chain will make a decision within two months.

And, as of this writing, Agency.com was still in the running (the first rounds of cuts come this week). This despite presenting a video that was too long by four minutes, violated the general rules of secrecy that surround pitches and insulted the client and its employees.

"Agency.com wanted to show how viral could work instead of just telling them about it in a video or written response," said Tom Ajello, VP-creative director at Agency.com, New York, in a statement, declining to comment further.

P.J. Pereira, executive creative director, AKQA, San Francisco, pointed out that such videos aren't made for bloggers. If it was to promote the agency to the general public, "then I think it may have backfired," he said. "If they're doing that to prove to the client they could do something that would be picked up by a larger audience, they may have had their point."
Most Popular
In this article: