×

Once registered, you can:

  • - Read additional free articles each month
  • - Comment on articles and featured creative work
  • - Get our curated newsletters delivered to your inbox

By registering you agree to our privacy policy, terms & conditions and to receive occasional emails from Ad Age. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account.

Editorial: A lottery with no winners

Published on .

Will Rogers, American original and vaudevillian comedian, once commented: "I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." Writing about the California Lottery Commission's two-year quest to find an ad agency is much like that. Readers could be forgiven for thinking Advertising Age had published a late April Fool's story last week when we reported the commission is going to rerun the review process-for the third time.

Commission Director-CEO Joan Wilson tried to pass off the debacle by saying "this is not private industry" and that "the commission cannot simply waive a requirement for one bidder that would disadvantage another." This cannot justify its failure to devise and communicate rules sufficiently clearly that the agencies could follow them. While trying to create a level playing field for the agencies is a lofty goal, disqualifying one of them, Foote, Cone & Belding Worldwide, because it faxed rather than hand-delivered its media bid is more like bureaucracy gone crazy than good business practice.

In obsessing over the precise ownership of the agencies' media siblings, and whether bids were hand-delivered, the commission lost sight of the purpose of this exercise: choosing the best work and media plan for its budget. The commission's executive committee is lucky this isn't private industry. Few shareholders would tolerate such delay and complication in a simple task.

All the blame cannot be solely laid at the commission's door, however. The agencies should be embarrassed at the part they played in this two-year tragicomedy. Sure, there's a dearth of new work on the West Coast right now. But the persistent protesting of the review results by rivals Grey Worldwide, McCann-Erickson Worldwide and DDB Worldwide must seem pretty petty to the California taxpayers. All parties must commit themselves to making the third review quick and painless.

Most Popular
In this article: