More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters

AUDIO: Bob Garfield vs. Bill Gates

World's Richest Man Interviewed by 'Ad Age's' Most Ornery

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- At last week's Corbis Creativity 2.0 panel in Manhattan, Advertising Age columnist Bob Garfield sat down for a private one-on-one with
Image
Listen to Bob Garfield and Bill Gates mix it up in this five-minute program of interview excerpts. | ALSO: Comment on this audio program in the 'Your Opinion' box below.
image
image
Corbis and Microsoft chief Bill Gates. The two discussed the likely impact of IPTV on advertising and the distribution of TV content by the major networks' local affiliate stations. Garfield also asked Mr. Gates about the Apple ads, in which actor John Hodgman plays a character modeled on Mr. Gates. Mr. Gates was not amused. Listen to the audio to the left or read the transcript below.

GARFIELD: The digital world, from the PC to the internet, to the -- excuse the expression -- iPod, has altered our media behavior on a grand scale. But the marketing world has been very, very slow to catch up. Is the old paradigm the Titanic and are a lot of people gonna go down with the ship?

GATES: No, I think it's more evolutionary than that. The idea of creativity, great storytelling -- those things exist in the new medium. But you have to take advantage of the new tools and the new ways that you can do that targeting. And you'll see a little bit more turmoil in terms of who succeeds and who doesn't. But it's not some overnight cataclysm. It's year by year, particularly young consumers working in a different way, and there's a lot to be proven out here.

GARFIELD: It seems to me the old model was built both on the content side and on the marketing side by the mass audience and the new model was all about aggregating individuals or very, very narrow groups. Can you evolve from one to the other?

GATES: Oh, you can definitely evolve. If we know what 19-year-olds are watching, even if it's a thousand different things, technologically letting you buy the space to be on all 1,000 of those things will be as easy as it used to be to buy that single show that everybody was watching at the same time. And so, the ability to hit large numbers and even learn to get the feedback and how they responded to it ... did they click on something? Did they indicate favorability? Advertising will be less on the blind than it has been. So that means ads that really didn't work will receive less payment, and the ones that work well-that will be clear, and the people that get those will get more value.

GARFIELD: I couldn't help but notice that your half-billion-dollar introduction of the Vista operating system is taking place overwhelmingly in print and on broadcast. Is this a case of the cobbler's children going barefoot?

GATES: Well, the percentage of that marketing campaign that's digital is very substantial -- I think over 30%. And today when you want a big, big phenomena, you use all the vehicles that are available. A customer I work with a lot is Geico, who sells car insurance. And the internet has revolutionized their business-over half their customers are acquired that way. And yet they drive a lot of that traffic by having what's been one of the fastest-increasing ad budgets around, building their brand, building that association with great insurance value. And so for large-scale companies like Microsoft and Geico, it's very much a hybrid model.

GARFIELD: This is based on pretty much zero data, but it doesn't seem to me that either Vista's or Zune's campaign has so far generated a whole lot of buzz. Are they generating any business?

GATES: Vista's doing extremely well. Zune has gained a great No. 2 position as a product that's completely new for us. Vista's the most-used piece of software there is in the world, and so it has this incredible impact as people talk about how it simplifies things that they've done. We've seen a much stronger reception in terms of people upgrading the software, buying new PCs than we expected there. I think a lot of that had to do with how much we worked with users in advance and understood exactly what they were interested in.

GARFIELD: Tell me about your work with AT&T to develop IPTV (Internet Protocol TV) -- basically internet TV. What effect will that have on our consumer habits and what effect will that have on the broadcast industry?

GATES: Well, what we call IPTV is enabled by the fact that the internet has enough bandwidth to carry even high-definition video signals. So instead of getting just a broadcast signal that goes the same thing to every household, there's data over the internet that's targeted specifically at that TV set. And so if you're watching a news segment, the areas of great interest to you are made longer and the ones of less interest to you are made shorter. The sports you want are more in-depth, the weather you care about. Likewise, the ads are based on what would be interesting to you. So not everyone who's watching the news show is seeing the same ads.

GARFIELD: It seems to me that the online world is still kind of surprisingly two-dimensional -- essentially just a digital version of the video and the text from the old world order. Is there an online third dimension that truly exploits the digital space?

GATES: The richness of the web experience has a long ways to go. For example, when you shop online today, it is just a two-dimensional list of products. That'll change to be that you'll see a three-dimensional store that you can walk around and serendipitously see different, say, book titles and merchandise that may be of interest to you. ... In fact, one of the ways you'll get that is you'll go into what Microsoft calls Virtual Earth, and you'll just be walking around the downtown on your screen, and you'll see a store, you'll say you want to go in, and there you are looking at all the offerings that they have, whether it's an art gallery, bookstore, restaurant -- and that's a new experience. ... We can make the internet more engaging. It's the place where all the innovation's taking place, not back in the old broadcast approach, where the sets are fixed and everybody's got to watch the same thing.

GARFIELD: Advertising Age had a story this week about Bono's Red campaign. So far the campaign has cost $100 million among participants and generated, according to our story, $18 million. As co-founder of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has donated many, many hundreds of millions of dollars to the same cause, what are your thoughts about the whole concept of branded philanthropy?

GATES: There's some pretty strange numbers in the question that you put in there. The Red campaign has saved lives, and there's something wrong about your cost number in there. ... Red is about saving lives, and if you -- if there's not enough money to buy drugs, people die, and so we can say, "Hey, let's just let that happen," or we can take all the avenues available to us, including governments being more generous -- and that's been a big thing -- philanthropy being more generous, and consumers and their activities, being able to associate themselves with saving lives. And the success of, say, what the Gap did or what Armani did or various things show that consumers do want to get involved in saving lives. And so anybody who says that hasn't been successful, that's, you know, pretty cynical stuff that I wouldn't agree with.

GARFIELD: I want to ask you one more thing: Those Mac ads -- how do you feel about the John Hodgman character?

GATES: I can't comment on someone else's ad.

GARFIELD: OK ... but he's you.

GATES: Yeah, I'm not gonna comment on someone else's ad.

GARFIELD: OK, well, Bill Gates, thank you so much for joining us.

(Silence)

GARFIELD: Can I just have a clean goodbye?

(Silence)

GARFIELD: OK, can you just say goodbye? Thank you or goodbye or something like that?

GATES: Goodbye.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

13 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: AUDIO: Bob Garfield vs. Bill Gates
  By memememe | cuba, MO March 12, 2007 10:20:00 am:
Mr. Gates.....You can't comment or you're not gonna comment? Which one is it? It sounds like you very much can comment on anything you just refuse to. That's a big difference between can't and not gonna. You are talking to someone from ADVERTISING AGE. What did he expect....questions about his glasses.
  By Rick | Lexington, KY March 12, 2007 10:48:36 am:
It's a shame that an opportunity to interview a successful and intelligent man like Bill Gates turned into a juvenile battle of wills over Apple's ads. Looking at Mr. Gates' responses, you gain insight and a glimpse at the inner workings of the mind of a futurist. I would have preferred to see the last question of the interview be used to get one more look at things to come. Instead, we get a question that ends the interview on a sour note. In the end, the reader loses.
  By ANTHONY | LIGHT, MA March 13, 2007 12:34:45 am:
If Bill Gates doesn't want to be asked this question (and come off like a whiny little kid by refusing to answer it) maybe his PR handlers (numerous and well-paid no doubt) should have taken the trouble to read some of Garfiled's columns... pretty easy to figure he's gonna ask the question unless you can request otherwise... arb:
  By Craig | Wichita, KS March 13, 2007 09:21:38 am:
Wow, who would think the Mac ad question would bring the Bob & Bill show to such a screeching halt, thanks to the Garfield:101- How to end an interview. Never the less, here I am responding via Microsoft software with my MS operating system. The very software Mr-G envisioned as the system of the future. I wonder where we would be if it wasn't created? Bob may still be writing his articles on a Royal typewriter. I thought the article was interesting and most certainly entertaining. While Gates and his 'evil empire' created and may deserve much of the controversy surrounding their existence, it took his vision to lead and inspire the industry where it is today.
  By johnsmith | San Diego, CA March 13, 2007 01:34:37 pm:
I'm amazed. I'm baffled. I again (two articles in a row) think highly of Garfield. The ..."he cobbler's children going barefoot?" - is a pretty funny line and points out the reality of so called traditional vs. the alternative new marketing landscape. There isn't one.Secondly, how one simple question could blindside Bill Gates shows how shallow he is. I can't believe they (Gates/Micro) hadn't come up with a great spin for that one. Nice BG, I'm impressed.
  By Amir | NY, NY March 13, 2007 04:06:57 pm:
The fact that Bill Gates agreed to talk to arguablly the most clueless man to ever make a buck off other people's talent is mesmerizing. Garfeild is hack at ad journalism, and after reading this, he appears to be one at simply just being a reporter.
  By mcritz | Brookline, MA March 15, 2007 04:52:53 pm:
When asked about the future of advertising, Mr. Gates gives us a vision of TV ads that are one part blinking web ad and two parts Orwellian dystopia. Call me old-fashioned; I don't really want my TV to know my age, gender, and willingness to buy plumbing.

My impression of the tone of Mr. Gates's voice is that he is agitated and defensive. It must be difficult to define one's self-image as a pioneering leader of the future yet fail to convey the grand vision.

Mr. Garfield & the editors of Advertising Age seem a little snide. The editors feature an unattractive image of Mr. Gates. Mr. Garfield seems to press Mr. Gates on his understanding of TV advertising contracts. Finally, he asks Mr. Gates if he likes being parodied in Apple ads.

Well, I'd be grumpy, too.

However, I think Mr. Gates should try better to behave in a way befitting the people and company he represents.

On the other hand, Mr. Gates is a tasteless, morally bankrupt jerk who deserves to be exposed.
  By Terence | Chicago, IL March 15, 2007 08:29:47 pm:
I never really had any respect for Mr. Gates before listening to this podcast. After I did, I now have even less respect for Mr. Gates, especially after he was asked about the Apple ads. He is an overrated fool.
  By tonysb | Coquitlam, BC March 16, 2007 01:02:38 am:
The last part of the interview with "can I just have a clean goodbye" seems totally orchestrated. Maybe Garfield just wanted to make a joke of the whole issue (and pretend the interview is another commercial so he's stuttering like he did), and still get a good response from Gates, but it didn't work. Some people took it as he was just making fun of Gates, which does not have to be so either.

Either way, I lived in Europe most of my life and mentioning competitors in advertising is not allowed there. Prevents any ad-campaigns in which one lies about the other and it's all a question of who lies better...
  By memememe | cuba, MO March 18, 2007 11:15:46 pm:
We totally misread this interview.....what Gates very much disliked was having to defend the RED campaign which is now very much under scrutiny. Why? It is essential that charities for life and medicine have 0% fraud and 100% transparency....maybe even live on the web in real dollars? Gates knows this and he hates what kind of waste may have happened in this particular campaign. Clean this RED up.......and turn this idea into green.
  By MLC102306 | Fitchburg, MA March 20, 2007 10:59:21 am:
Wow. I'm not surprised. Bill Gates does not seem to be a classy guy. I'm disappointed. For all his arrogance, I'm sure an argument could made about the demise of society or whatever you want to call it with respect to the personal computer.
  By hiproductions | Henderson, NV March 21, 2007 01:21:41 am:
Pretty sad. Bill Gates is so bitter about Apple's superior culture.

I wish him well. I think the Mac adds provide a lot of insight as to who Bill Gates is at heart. A loveable computer boy that you can just hug. A bitter but loveable computer boy that Jobs could just hug.

Vista is so far inferior to the Mac OS. Once Apple gets smart and releases OS X for PCs. Game over. But hopefully the hugs will never end.

Andrew Hamilton
Video Production Las Vegas
http://www.hiproductions.com
  By jkrawl | Chicago, IL January 20, 2010 06:46:47 pm:
It seems as if Bill Gates is bitter over 2 things: The Red campaign, and Apple's dominance now.

I think he needs to be more mature about both of these issues. Of course, admit that the red campaign was not as successful as you hoped and that Apple and Steve Jobs is more smarter than you!

Frank
http://www.gettingbackyourex.com
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News