More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters

VIDEO: Questioning the Basic Assumptions of Viral Marketing

Computer Modeling Faults 'Tipping Point' and 'The Influentials'

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

vidheader
Image
Research work by a Columbia professor questions assumptions about viral marketing. | ALSO: Comment on this article in the 'Your Opinion' box below.
Image

Videography: Hoag Levins

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Computer modeling studies conducted by Columbia University professor Duncan Watts raise serious questions about several fundamental assumptions that anchor the viral-marketing craze. Ad Age editor-at-large Matt Creamer discusses the findings, which fault some points in the books "The Tipping Point" and "The Influentials." Those two best-sellers helped set fire to the idea that targeting very small groups of influential consumers could ultimately send low-cost cascades of marketing messages across the culture.

Also see the full print story about this issue.


Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

1 Comment
Subscribe to comments on: VIDEO: Questioning the Basic Assumptions of Viral Marketing
  By samhuxley | Arlington, VA July 19, 2007 05:13:09 pm:
While this report is interesting, I think it omits some key aspects of Duncan Watt's report that make his findings less relevant to marketers. Most importantly, the report looks only at interpersonal networks and how individuals directly affect the opinion of people they have a direct relationship with. Every buzz marketing program I've encountered relies not only (or even primarily) on this type of network, but rather on the amplification of an influential's opinion via their blog, video sharing, or social network. In fact the report states: "Thus although the question of how different forms of influence- including traditional media, web, and interpersonal influence- compare and interact with each other is indeed an interesting one, it is outside the scope of this article, which deals only with interpersonal influence" (pg. 21-22). To take it back to the epidemic analogy, this is akin to modeling the spread of HIV or SARS without taking into account factors such as roads or jet travel that amplify the contagion.

Furthermore, the conclusions are based on the assumption that influencers must be found- again from the original report: "Influentials, by definition, are relatively rare- here they constitute 10% of the population- thus they are necessarily more difficult to locate than average individuals, and possibly more difficult to mobilize also." (pg 18). In reality, smart marketers design programs that individuals want to be a part of, and the interaction between the marketer makes this process much more effective. Not many people I know really believe that there is a magic group of influencers out there that we can approach and then grab our checks- instead it is developing an intimate knowledge of how communities interact with each other, and then packaging a program so that when a user steps onto an out-sized soapbox, our content has the value and portability to go from merely "lol" to phenomena. Thanks,

Sam Huxley
VP of Marketing
New Media Strategies
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News