VIDEO: Questioning the Basic Assumptions of Viral Marketing
Computer Modeling Faults 'Tipping Point' and 'The Influentials'
By
Hoag Levins
Published: July 19, 2007

|
| Research work by a Columbia professor questions assumptions about viral marketing. | ALSO: Comment on this article in the 'Your Opinion' box below.
Videography: Hoag Levins |
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Computer modeling studies conducted by Columbia University professor Duncan Watts raise serious questions about several fundamental assumptions that anchor the viral-marketing craze. Ad Age editor-at-large Matt Creamer discusses the findings, which fault some points in the books "The Tipping Point" and "The Influentials." Those two best-sellers helped set fire to the idea that targeting very small groups of influential consumers could ultimately send low-cost cascades of marketing messages across the culture.
Also see the
full print story about this issue.
Furthermore, the conclusions are based on the assumption that influencers must be found- again from the original report: "Influentials, by definition, are relatively rare- here they constitute 10% of the population- thus they are necessarily more difficult to locate than average individuals, and possibly more difficult to mobilize also." (pg 18). In reality, smart marketers design programs that individuals want to be a part of, and the interaction between the marketer makes this process much more effective. Not many people I know really believe that there is a magic group of influencers out there that we can approach and then grab our checks- instead it is developing an intimate knowledge of how communities interact with each other, and then packaging a program so that when a user steps onto an out-sized soapbox, our content has the value and portability to go from merely "lol" to phenomena. Thanks,
Sam Huxley
VP of Marketing
New Media Strategies