November 21, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Italian Vogue Selling Like the New iPhone

U.S. Marketers and Publishers Might Want to Take Note

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Carol Watson Carol Watson
"Maybe in our country it is not the best idea. But I don't care. I think it is not my problem if they don't like it -- it's their problem."

That was Italian Vogue editor in chief Franca Sozzani's response to the fear that the July issue would not sell. The only thing that might be bothering her now is not printing enough copies to send to the U.S., considering all the buzz.

Italian Vogue's July issue is dedicated to black models. Coverage included a look at Naomi Campbell, Iman, Tyra Banks, Liya Kebede, Jourdan Dunn, Alek Wek and Pat Cleveland. Reports in The New York Times, NBC's "Today" show and the fashion trades added to consumer and industry buzz, creating a demand that newsstand operators I talked to had never seen before for a foreign publication (especially one in a language that most of the the buyers probably couldn't read). Click here for a guided tour of the issue.

Tracking the issue down was a journey in itself. Even in New York City, the few newsstands that carried the issue sold out within hours (one newsstand went through 400 copies). There were waiting lists and prepaid orders. Many of the customers, according to newsstand staffers I talked to, bought all four versions with different covers as keepsakes. At $16 a copy (one newsstand wanted to charge me $20 to prepay for one from his next batch), it was a circulation director's fantasy come true.

Ms. Sozzani said her decision was influenced by a New York protest group as well as Barack Obama's success in the U.S. presidential primaries. According to the Telegraph, the move to create an issue dedicated to black models was "in reaction to recent anger over the reluctance of fashion magazines to feature black models on their covers. Many industry insiders claim black girls are not used because they just 'do not sell.'"

It seems that Italian Vogue proved smart U.S. marketers wrong.

Beverly Smith, a fashion/celebrity/lifestyle expert and former International Fashion Director at Vibe, comments that the issue is a great thing for the models and industry. She says that although there were no ads featuring black models, the models had an opportunity to take advantage of the moment and "make it work!" The glaring lack of ads with black models in the issue illustrates the black-and-white reality of the opportunities for black models in the industry and tells the story better than anything else could. Hopefully, advertisers will see the missed branding and revenue opportunities in ignoring the power of these talented women.

Photographer Steven Meisel said: "I thought, it's ridiculous, this discrimination. It's so crazy to live in such a narrow, narrow place. Age, weight, sexuality, race -- every kind of prejudice. ... I have asked my advertising clients so many times, 'Can we use a black girl?' They say no. Advertisers say black models don't sell."

Jerri DeVard, a former senior VP at Verizon Communications, joined Veronica Webb, who is featured in the issue, on the "Today" show to promote the issue and shared that ad pages were up 30% in the July issue of Italian Vogue. Ms. DeVard, who is credited with holding Verizon's ad agencies accountable for the diversity of talent working on the Verizon account, further comments: "Until advertisers say they want a black woman featured in the ad, it won't happen. The guilty parties are the advertisers. We have to hold the advertisers accountable. Ms. Sozzani can control the editorial, but she cannot dictate the models used by the advertisers."

The upside to this -- aside from a great magazine issue -- is that the publicity and financial success of the July issue throughout the world should be continued proof to U.S. marketers of the buying power and the fierce hunger for great content. No translation necessary.
15 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Italian Vogue Selling Like the New iPhone
  By BCanseco | chicago, IL July 19, 2008 04:15:20 am:
No translation necessary."? Not so sure about that.

There's a reason this was done by Italian Vogue and not the US Vogue. Or Maxim. Or Cosmo. Or any other "mainstream" mag in any category for that matter. (You think GQ/Men's Health would do a comparable issue this for black men, even? Don't kid yourself.)

We've heard all the buzz words and excuses over the years from "the only color that matters is green" to "needs more universal appeal", etc.

Fact is, it took a non-us centric media outlet to acknowledge the fact that Black women not named Halle Berry or Tyra are just as attractive, relevant and yes—"feminine" as the types of women these industries hold up as the status quo.

And until this sad attitude changes in the fashion world and on Madison Ave, stunt issues like this will remain feel-good news that elites can brag about as they go back to the usual fare once the dust re-settles.
  By ericjhenderson | New York, NY July 19, 2008 01:09:46 pm:
Thanks for catching a moment here, carol. The streets were buzzing for this issue. And, yep, it evaporated off the shelves.

I found out about the issue just on regular new york walkingaroundness - days before it hit stands - I heard people in each shop asking about it. Black people, white, women, men.

There will always be global demand, for the type of beauty and grace expressed in the the black woman. The question remains how that demand is evidenced.

I think the public is, again, ahead of the skeptical publisher on this one - in any country. Thanks!


e

  By peppermiller | CHICAGO, IL July 19, 2008 09:02:49 pm:
Will they ever learn? Understand the gap and fill it with "Kodak moments" and everyone wins.
  By alwayzambitious | Brooklyn, NY July 21, 2008 11:37:06 am:
" the move to create an issue dedicated to black models was in reaction to recent anger over the reluctance of fashion magazines to feature black models on their covers.'"


I appreciate Ms. Sozzani. She set out to fiercely say screw the trend. I wish the world made more folks like her –not cause she put blacks on the cover but because she isn't the status quo. Though I wonder if Barack wasn't as successful as it then would she still do it. But I'm a fan of her though.
–––


"Advertisers say black models don't sell."
Is that the real reason? It seems that they do sell, if this issue could be considered an indication of that. But what else do we have to do to see black models in the US Vogue and their ads?
–––


"stunt issues like this will remain feel-good news that elites can brag about as they go back to the usual fare once the dust re-settles."


Hadji, I couldn't have said it better myself. Going back to the usual fare. Humph! Will it change? Sadly, I don't even think Madison Ave cares : ( ...or if they do it'll just be a stunt or a tactic. Nothing that shows they genuinely want to give different races a chance at mainstream exposure.


Dwayne Neckles, Brooklyn, New York

  By Jason | Urbana, IL July 21, 2008 02:33:28 pm:
Well said, Carol. I remain hopeful (even in light of my knowledge of the industry's history) that the success of this issue will help marketers and publishers see that having people of African descent in your ads and magazines doesn't make other consumer groups run for cover.
  By lmm921 | NEW YORK, NY July 22, 2008 12:05:58 am:
Great article Carol. It took me 2 weeks to finally find a place in NYC that had a copy.

The good news is that this issue for Italian Vogue puts an important spotlight on this issue and will hopefully effect change.


But why is that it was the bravery of the editor of Italian Vogue? Where is Ana Wintour or Andre Leon Talley to do this for American Vogue, to call attention to this issue.

Hopefully, American advertisers will now get a clue, that black women can sell, because we sure do buy.
  By thecutman | BRONX, NY July 22, 2008 08:25:46 am:
In 1972-73, ITALIAN VOGUE did a special issue on Black Fashion...street fashion. It also included a feature on Miles Davis' wardrobe which was shot by the famous Black photographer, Tony Barboza. It too created a firestorm around the world, in the fashion industry and the publishing world.

The late, great Nat King Cole said in 1957 when Mad Ave refused to support his TV show,
"Sponsors don't have guts. Madison Avenue is afraid of the dark." Well it's 2008, SAfrica has been Black ruled for two decades...yet Black Americans still are an oddity in fashion and publishing, industries to which they contribute BILLIONS of their dollars.

Nat Cole's scathing observation was an understament...the advertising, fashion and publishing industries have turned New York City into Johannesburg and made "Jim Crow" seem like a "benevolent institution." Long live the "Men&Women in the Grey Flannel Sheets." -Sanford Moore

  By taralynwill | Nutley, NJ July 22, 2008 05:11:36 pm:
Carol,
Great article! I'm happy to see that they have attempted again to make a statement. However an even stronger statement would have been to also have the ads contain images of people of African descent. When you don't take their money, and are successful then you make a REAL statement. I'm looking to see the mainstream mags like Vogue, have an issue the has all blacks in the ads regardless of who is featured on the cover. Then it will be about more than just "green".
  By simoneisis | New York, NY July 22, 2008 08:26:57 pm:
Personally I am tired. Tired of having to prove we can sell (and we do). Tired of having to justify our existence and shouting "hey look at our buying power". "Nice" this was done in 2008. However sad we have to make such a statement to prove women of color can and will sell (and not the throw away January issue, with our mouths all open - Ms. Hudson or when shared with others - Sports Illustrated or rescueing a "damsel in distress" - Ms. Wintour). When Trace does "Black Girls Rule" it is a statement and well, true :-). However flipping until 1/4 through to see a face of color has to make ALL the advertisers feel shame. Come on people. Really.
- Simone Pratt
  By IMG2008 | Brooklyn, NY July 22, 2008 08:34:40 pm:
Finally! I am so glad that Italian Vogue had the guts to show the rest of the world that Black, blue, pink, brown--not just white, can sell.

However, what will happen when the buzz stops buzzing? I hardly think a fashion magazine will change the issue of diversity in the industry. We need a movement not an issue.
  By a | chicago, IL July 23, 2008 04:53:02 pm:
The fact that the mainstream fashion industry still hasn't decided that women of color (I loop hispanic and asian into this, who are even less represented in a mainstream ads) are worth the time to photograph because its comfort - the powers that be go with what they know. Its inexcusable but its to be expected in an industry that has more people who are one color over any other. I truly hope the italian vogue does cause a change in the international advertising game. I would love them to do an annual (with a translation guide for us non italian readers) like the Trace Black Girls Rule issue.
  By cdobles | Brooklyn, NY July 24, 2008 11:18:34 am:
Those wishing to make a statement about discrimination fall short by selecting a specific race to make their point. They should keep in mind what everyone seems to be forgetting. THIS IS NOT A BLACK AND WHITE ISSUE, particularly from a global perspective. There are many shades of brown in between that have been as discriminated against in fashion and have otherwise been disenfranchised because of their race, religion or culture.

I will encourage all of you who truly belief in diversity, as I do, to view the bigger picture and become active accomplices to all the shades in between in the quest for equality and inclusion. When you raise your voice, raise it for all who have been victimized by discrimination.

Not to do so makes you an accomplice to segregation.
  By JackJones | Chicago, IL July 24, 2008 12:05:05 pm:
Oh, calm down, Cristian. This post is celebrating the Black issue of Italian Vogue. Regarding your point about adding diversity to protests against discrimination, you're right. But it's not like anyone is preventing Latinos, Asian Americans, women, GLBT, etc. from joining the efforts. And heaven forbid White folks might lead the charge too.
  By nichellemybelle1 | The ville, NJ July 26, 2008 06:19:03 pm:
Myself and an associate of mine have been chatting about this for a couple of months since we heard the issue was coming out. Hadj said it best "It took a non-us centric media outlet to acknowledge.." I do hope it helps broaden the minds of agency folks and client brands alike, but I'm not very optimistic, but I will continue to be a voice for change.

On a not so serious note (the girly side ;), When I first heard about the issue, I had the same feeling I had when I got my first black Barbie, or when I saw the first black Barbie named Nichelle!!! lol - I've viewed some of the Naomi shots online - absolutely stunning and sexy. And of course I've put a request in to get two copies of the mag - I can't wait to see it as it represents global pride for women of African decent..now let me go dust off my "black girl" t-shirt and wear it to work on Monday!!!
  By pkayne | Toronto, ON July 29, 2008 01:18:52 pm:
This just shows how out of touch advertisers are. The truth is though we are not colour blind in this world. When it comes to marketing and advertising, the target market really don't care what race the model is. The model is just part of the whole ad.

I have never thought - "why are they using a hispanic, black or asian girl in this ad?" And I certainly have never decided whether or not to buy a certain brand because of the skin colour of the model in the ad. What makes me want to patronise - is the message conveyed through the ad, the creativity of the advertising concept and known quality of the brand.

A white woman or man hawking some type of good does not make me more inclined to want that product. And it does not make me think that they are better suited to represent a brand. So advertisers should definitely stop projecting their biases on the audience because they clearly don't understand our needs.



Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News