Tags:
View All |
Evan Tracey |
Joe Erwin |
Politics 2.0 |
Spots |
Busted |
Evan Tracey BioViewing tag:
Politics 2.0
Hard to Pick a Clear Winner Among Candidates
Posted
by Ken Wheaton
on
11.29.07
@ 09:05 AM
Last night's Republican debate was raucous, touched on important issues such as immigration and out-of-control spending, featured two questions by black voters (see below) in a Republican debate and attracted a crowd rowdy enough to boo responses. (See all the questions, responses here.)
Will Pay for Placement of Contest Winner
Posted
by Ira Teinowitz
on
08.30.07
@ 05:38 PM
WASHINGTON (AdAge.com) -- First came Hillary Clinton's contest for a campaign song. Now Mitt Romney's campaign
is unveiling the first contest to create a campaign ad -- or at least the first one a campaign will pay to run.
Posted
by Abbey Klaassen
on
08.14.07
@ 11:23 AM
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Google "Mitt Romney" and you'll find he's got company among the paid-search results: John McCain and Rudy Giuliani. That's because front-running Republicans are busy buying up competitive search terms in a bid to steal rivals' traffic and votes. (READ MORE)
When It Comes to Search, Candidates Should Buy the Issues
Posted
by Abbey Klaassen
on
08.08.07
@ 04:05 PM
Google hasn't been quiet about increasing its presence in Washington -- but it's not just an army of lobbyists it has hired. In time for a heated 2008 presidential election, Google has added some political muscle to its sales team, tapping Peter Greenberger to convince candidates and advocacy groups they should be spending more on search, site targeting and, of course, YouTube. Greenberger worked on the 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign and Gore's failed 2000 bid. He managed Brad Carson's Senate race in Oklahoma (with the cowboy boots gathering dust in the closet to prove it) before working in the public affairs division of D.C.-based interactive firm New Media Strategies.
Obama, Clinton and Paul Leading the Race
Posted
by Abbey Klaassen and Ken Wheaton
on
08.07.07
@ 03:39 PM
There's yet another place to get data on which presidential candidate is winning the web race. Check out Hitwise's Election 2008 Data Center, complete with RSS Feeds.
Hesitant to Agree to CNN/YouTube Debate
Posted
by Ken Wheaton
on
07.27.07
@ 10:17 AM
As I've said before, I don't think this election is going to be won (or even overly affected) by Web 2.0 gimmicks. That said, if the major Republican candidates refuse to participate in the CNN/YouTube debate it will be perhaps one of the stupidest moves in the early campaign season. The CNN/YouTube debate is not a Web 2.0 gimmick. It's a televised debate that allows "average" people, young people a chance to talk back at candidates.
I'll Gladly Eat Crow on This One
Posted
by Ken Wheaton
on
07.24.07
@ 11:08 AM
Friday evening,
I wrote a post in this space saying that we shouldn't expect much out of the ordinary from the CNN/YouTube debate. And while I still don't think the event comes anywhere near being a historic moment equivalent to the first televised debate, between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960, I definitely think it was a refreshing change of pace and by far the best of the Democratic debates of an early season.
Network Still Completely in Control
Posted
by Ken Wheaton
on
07.20.07
@ 06:11 PM
Over at Slate, Mickey Kaus has been harping on the CNN/YouTube debate. CNN, he says, "completely misses what's so innovative and subversive about YouTube--namely the ability of average citizens to put political messages before millions of potential voters without the approval of MSM gatekeepers."
Seeks Help for YouTube Video
Posted
by Ken Wheaton
on
07.10.07
@ 11:19 AM
This just came over the Campaign Trail transom, "signed" by Mandy Grunwald, media adviser/director of advertising for Hillary for President :
Posted
by Ken Wheaton
on
06.21.07
@ 04:36 PM
In a cross-post on PrezVid/Washington Post, Jeff Jarvis offers up the best of the potential debate questions posted to YouTube so far.
12››
Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News
2 comments