November 27, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Media, Agency Circles Should Have Backup Plan for Obama

What Will You Do if the Unthinkable Happens?

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Barack Obama is not the president of the United States. This is a fact. Also a fact: There's a chance he might not become the president of the United States. But for those of us working in the media and living in the bluest of blue sections of this country, that's hard to remember. After all, eight out of 10 of your friends are voting for Obama. The ninth friend is a bitter Clinton holdout who'll vote for Obama come election day. And the 10th guy is going to vote for Nader but is too embarrassed to tell you.

But if there's one thing all of us should have learned from the last go-round is that big-city America is not the sum total of America. The rest of the country might follow New York and L.A. when it comes to matters of music and fashion, but not when it comes to politics. You should remember your own emotions on that Wednesday morning in November four years ago. You should remember the silence in your office, broken only by cursing and weeping. All of this for John Kerry, a candidate you didn't even really like in the first place.

But these things are easy to forget. Partly because we live in a society probably more insular (and certainly more smug) than a 500-person village tucked into a West Virginia holler. And guess who they're not voting for in that West Virgina holler. Guess who they're not voting for in communities across America. Perhaps more eye-opening, guess who they're not voting for in the suburban and rural areas of Ohio. Now, you can psychoanalyze the reasons they're not voting for Obama all day long. That might make you feel better about yourself, but it's not going to change the fact that lots and lots of people you don't know are not voting for Obama. And all those Germans aren't voting for Obama. And while they might say they're voting for Obama, all those celebrities and "youth" voters have a nasty habit of forgetting to show up at the polls to, you know, actually vote.

Which is all to say this isn't in the bag yet. I know, I know. That's almost impossible to believe. It's partly because Obama has waged a far superior campaign on all fronts. It's partly because John McCain isn't exactly igniting the soul of even his own party. Hell, when even the Wall Street Journal is giving editorial space to someone claiming McCain doesn't have a shot, it becomes very hard to believe that McCain has a shot.

But have a look at the polls. According to our big-city narrative, Obama should be ahead by about 600 points. He's not. Granted, as someone in the office has pointed out to me, Obama is an African-American first-term senator with a funny name, so that he's leading in the polls at all indicates a huge sea change in American politics. Then again, his opponent is a geriatric with a mean streak, a man who's been tagged "Bush the Second." He often looks like a dried-out mummy on TV and can't read a speech to save his life. He says things like, "We did a Google." McCain is unpopular even in his own party.

And yet they're still neck and neck in the polls. You should realize that. You should study those polls every day just as a reminder (and perhaps as a motivator). I don't want to be a downer, but I also don't want you collapsing into a state of shock in the event of a McCain victory. Maybe you should have an oxygen bag on hand and a personal flotation device. I'm of the school of thought that the president usually isn't as important as we think he is -- especially when it comes to the economy. But I'm afraid that if Obama loses, I'll wake up Wednesday morning to find that the major networks have forgotten to put stuff on the air. Marketers might call their agencies to find that no one's shown up for work. New York and L.A. might actually come to a standstill.

This might be a job for "Saturday Night Live," but I almost wonder if someone should do some public-service announcements in media offices and ad agencies, counseling employees what to do in the case of an Obama defeat. "Please do not panic. Breathe slowly. And while it is OK to cry, it is not OK to run out into the street and start breaking windows at the Gap."

Maybe it's because this has been a banner year for me in calling things wrong when it comes to politics, but I'm open to the fact that I could be wrong about the November outcome. All I'm saying is that you should be, too.
17 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Media, Agency Circles Should Have Backup Plan for Obama
  By stanze464 | Denver, CO July 28, 2008 02:52:47 pm:
Maybe McCain should add this guy to his commercial about the media acting like a giddy high school girl when it comes to reporting on Obama. Seriously I don't see how people don't wake up and see what Obama is truly about. He's a racist with no experience that is going to work to really kill this economy. You think things are bad now, wait till he steps in to try and implement government health care or put capital gains taxes through the roof. He will lie his way into the office and unfortunately we wont find out what he is truly about until it is too late. I know who I'm voting for come elections, and it has nothing to do with the guy who's going to get his nuts chopped off by Jesse Jackson.
  By deanda | Union City, GA July 29, 2008 09:10:57 am:
Wow, a little angry, so glade to hear you have decided on a candidate. I just have a quick correction regarding your statement, the Bush administration killed no, no is killing this economy and "Bush the Second" will give it a good ol patriarchal burial.
  By WILLIAM | NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ July 29, 2008 09:20:47 am:
Talk about lying! The Bushies lied about the reasons to start a war, will not permit the public to see photos of the returning dead or their funerals under the guise of the families' privacy and treat our returning veterans like dirt while proclaiming their support for the troops. John McCain continues this charade – voting against our veterans and claiming our awful economy is just the result of whining. Electing John McCain will be a disaster for America and the world.
  By jerry.hill | Red Oak, TX July 29, 2008 09:23:06 am:
Never underestimate the power of mass stupidity. This is not "War of the Worlds" on the arly days of radio, but it is people so lost in their ability to think for themselves. So inept at solving their own problems, they will follow the Pied Piper out of Town. We try to prove this theory every time we create an ad. People are good but without a passion that binds, this country is for sale to the highest bidder. To bad. Jerry Hill
  By david | Philadelphia, PA July 29, 2008 09:41:00 am:
It's a shame the voting public is so corrupted by media that drink the Kool-Aid and act like lemmings without using their incredible intellect. Instead of examining the substance of the candidates, you buy into the hype. The Congress has the lowest poll numbers ever and is led by the party you choose to extol, yet how many of you will vote? after considering the facts, not the hype? You're right to say many people don't like McCain, but not because he's old or not qualified, but because he's not conservative enough. Obama is an empty suit who can't answer questions off the cuff, because he is only stellar when he is scripted. Leaders don't need scripts to lead or answer questions. This nation needs a leader in the next 8 years, not an empty suit. My vote will be based on substance not media hype or fluff, or a great orator.
  By Carolyn | Carpentersville, IL July 29, 2008 09:46:50 am:
OK, I'm the ninth friend, who is a bitter Clinton holdout who doesn't want to vote at all come election day for the first time in 25 years in protest. Sure Obama has no experience, that's what she was telling us all along. So why doesn't he finally unite the party and make her the VP candidate? In the primaries, Clinton led among voters 40 and older while Obama had the advantage with younger voters. Clinton did better with workers earning less than $60,000 a year while Obama did better among those with higher incomes. Clinton also had a significant lead among politically moderate voters. It can be no surprise that those in suburban and rural Ohio are not voting for Obama. Remember who they did vote for? So if it really is time for change, why can't we have a Black American AND a Woman leading the country? - C.M., Chicago, IL
  By CynicalSiren24 | Indianapolis, IN July 29, 2008 10:21:59 am:
Wait a sec... Obama isn't the president?! Thanks for reminding us, Ken! ;-) Once again, I find your sarcastic and fallacious rhetoric absolutely enlightening.

I don't understand your obsession is with this "big-city narrative." It seems to me that YOU are the one with New York-centric frame of mind and are trying desperately to relate to the rest of us. Sure, a lot of people across non-LA or NY America will not vote for Obama, but... have you forgotten that a lot of people will?

And just some facts to point out - Obama and McCain aren't exactly neck and neck. Yes, it does seem like Obama should be further ahead, but last time I checked, he's about 6 points again. For a presidential election (which are usually within 1 or 2 points, if you look at history), that's pretty darn good!

And yes, we whipper-snapper voters don't usually bother to vote, but it seems that you forgot to mention that we showed up in record-breaking droves in the PRIMARIES earlier this year. One can only guess that we might fancy to do the same in the November election.

As for the outcome of the election, even if McCain summoned a miracle and won, I wouldn't throw myself off a building. McCain's an okay guy - it's not like he's George Bush! Besides, I'm still recovering from my 48-story free fall from 2004.
  By KenWheaton | New York, NY July 29, 2008 10:37:21 am:
Cynical,
I have no doubt that YOU will keep your head on straight in the event of a loss. But I don't know the last time you've been to New York City. Even the Clinton supporters are looked upon with pity and disdain. All I know is that last time around, people were crying and screaming about John Kerry, a man about as inspiring as my left sock. This time around, I'm afraid that people might throw themselves out of windows or something.


In terms of the national polls, they're ultimately meaningless for a number of reasons (although that won't stop ME from quoting them!). Firstly, we don't vote as a nation. We vote state by state. Secondly, polls of registered voters aren't as reliable as polls of likely voters, which aren't as reliable as polls of active voters. (In a USAToday poll of LIKELY voters, McCain was ahead by four points).


But thanks for taking the time to read the post AND making reasonable commentary based on what you read -- you know, instead of reading two sentences, having a fit and then spouting paranoid gibberish (like some other people who will remain nameless).

  By gbalcom | LIGHTHOUSE POIN, FL July 29, 2008 10:38:04 am:
Why is Ad Age even giving Ken the opportunity to cry and whine about Obama? This article has nothing to do with ADVERTISNG! Ad Age, can we please get back to business? I hate to remind Ken that many of us Ad Age paid subscribers are not in love with Obama and are tired of the love-fest rhetoric. Do you want to comment on Obama and McCain's latest TV ad's or media spends..go ahead...but stick to business...sappy political blog postings that obviously swing so far from the middle, do not deserve coverage from Ad Age. Please give us all a break!
  By CynicalSiren24 | Indianapolis, IN July 29, 2008 11:29:11 am:
Ken,
The last time I was in NYC was November of 2000, so I'm a little out of touch. I'm surprised to learn that New Yorkers, of all people, don't have much love for Hillary! Interesting...

Good point about registered vs. likely voter polls.
  By jefffuller | MINNEAPOLIS, MN July 29, 2008 12:13:04 pm:
Living in "flyover land" and working in the advertising and media business for over twenty years I continually find it interesting how the Big City ad agency types assume we consume as they do - and try to force us to do so. For you who thought otherwise, this column IS all about advertising. The Obama and McCain campaigns have spent and will spend much more time and money in the Minnesotas, Iowas, Dakotas, Montanas, etc., than previous candidates ever have. Why? Because we do vote. We also spend. I am American hear me roar. This is why Mr. Wheaton's thoughts aren't just a commentary about how candidates need to listen better to those of us in the "hinterlands." Why are the Big Three automakers, at best, limping along? Could it be because their East Coast MBAs are out of touch with Middle-Americans and our wants and our needs? As long as the industry really believes "the rest of the country might follow New York and L.A. when it comes to matters of music and fashion," it will continue to struggle. "Follow New York and L.A."? Pardon me? Did you completely miss the influence of the Seattle Sound or two of the biggest music artists of recent history, Bob Dylan and Prince? Or, how about Austin, Texas, or Nashville, and too many more examples to name? Obama or McCain? I will not follow New York or L.A.'s lead. I'll support the person who is in touch with me and my family's wants and needs.
  By annevilla | SAN ANTONIO, TX July 29, 2008 12:18:30 pm:
This is, for me, an interesting creative exercise. Ken Wheaton has convinced himself that his views can have no legitmate opposition; that those who dare disagree must be bigoted back-holler half-wits.

Most of us in advertising, have had to remind clients that their opinion is just that, their opinion. How easily Wheaton slipped into a thought pattern so many of us mock in clients.
  By KenWheaton | New York, NY July 29, 2008 12:58:25 pm:
Anne,
Perhaps you can join up with people who claim I'm a McCain-supporting Obama hater to form a consensus about who I'm actually in the tank for.


But seriously, I didn't say anywhere in this piece that people NOT voting for Barack Obama are dimwitted bigots. In fact, I try to remind people in New York all the time that the No. 1 reason people in other parts of the country aren't going to vote for Obama is because he's a Democrat. And, believe it or not, people in some parts of the country don't like Democrats, regardless of race or religion. They base that decision on economic, social and religious factors. They also base it on perceived support for the troops and patriotism (and a candidate like Obama is never going to win a patriotism fight with a Republican).


That said, I'm from Louisiana and go back often. So I know for a FACT that there are people in parts of the country that are running around claiming Barack Obama is a Muslim. I didn't get that from the New Yorker cover or from an article in the Times. I got that from talking to real live people. (Of course, on the flip-side, you have 'intelligent' Democrats in the Northeast who believe Dick Cheney is the Darth Vader in some sort of global shadow government run by Halliburton).

  By kimoconnor | San Franciaco, CA July 29, 2008 04:35:34 pm:
Obama is a racist who wants to kill the economy? Wow, McCain (or other) supporters are desperate.
  By rafaelcabrera | Poway, CA July 31, 2008 07:07:02 pm:
Mr. Crain, (via email to the editor in chief at Crain, AdAge publisher)

Below is a comment I posted today regarding the aforementioned subject. Please get a hold on the editorial people and get their act together. This type our writing ought to go into a blog for Ken to in invest his time on when he is looking for a new job.

As readers, we signed on to expand our understanding of the industry we are in, not listen to a punk lamenting over a vote of four ago.

Either your organization cleans up your editorial mission or we will have to clean up our opt in options to Adage.

Rafael Cabrera
.......................

Ken,

Stop whining and cover advertising, marketing, web stuff! I can't believe your editor allowed you to post this pathetic diatribe.
Maybe we need to cut down on reading Adage if we are going to be treated to this garbage. Eric Schmidt is right. It's lamentable how good reporting is going away and how this new media has fallen short of the opportunity.

Rafael A. Cabrera
San Diego, CA
  By KenWheaton | New York, NY August 1, 2008 10:15:52 am:
Rafael,
Before you start lecturing anyone on the state of journalism today, you'd do well to learn the difference between a news article and a blog post. This piece is clearly housed in Campaign Trail, which is a blog. There are many opinions here, not all of them mine -- just as there are plenty of opinions all over AdAge.com. Then again, you seem to have misread the basic premise of the piece--which shouldn't suprise me coming from someone who sees fit to call people "punks." I was not lamenting the election of four years ago. I challenge you to find one sentence where it says I was sitting at my desk crying.


Since you and others seems so insistent that there be a lesson in everything posted on Ad Age, let me spell out the lesson for you: "When working in marketing and media, don't assume the rest of the country thinks like you and your friends do." I thought that was pretty obvious. Then again, it seems like plenty of people would rather skip over the reading/understanding portion and jump right to the outraged comments.

  By nkb | baltimore, MD August 14, 2008 08:42:30 am:
I find this article/blog extremely offensive to every American voter, even non-voters. Your innuendoes and rather blunt comments regarding this election and the voters is frankly, appalling.What it does demonstrate is your complete inablity to understand, define, discuss, with any intelligence this political climate, the candidates and the general public.



Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News