Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
Media, Agency Circles Should Have Backup Plan for Obama
What Will You Do if the Unthinkable Happens?
Barack Obama is not the president of the United States. This is a fact. Also a fact: There's a chance he might not become the president of the United States. But for those of us working in the media and living in the bluest of blue sections of this country, that's hard to remember. After all, eight out of 10 of your friends are voting for Obama. The ninth friend is a bitter Clinton holdout who'll vote for Obama come election day. And the 10th guy is going to vote for Nader but is too embarrassed to tell you.But if there's one thing all of us should have learned from the last go-round is that big-city America is not the sum total of America. The rest of the country might follow New York and L.A. when it comes to matters of music and fashion, but not when it comes to politics. You should remember your own emotions on that Wednesday morning in November four years ago. You should remember the silence in your office, broken only by cursing and weeping. All of this for John Kerry, a candidate you didn't even really like in the first place.
But these things are easy to forget. Partly because we live in a society probably more insular (and certainly more smug) than a 500-person village tucked into a West Virginia holler. And guess who they're not voting for in that West Virgina holler. Guess who they're not voting for in communities across America. Perhaps more eye-opening, guess who they're not voting for in the suburban and rural areas of Ohio. Now, you can psychoanalyze the reasons they're not voting for Obama all day long. That might make you feel better about yourself, but it's not going to change the fact that lots and lots of people you don't know are not voting for Obama. And all those Germans aren't voting for Obama. And while they might say they're voting for Obama, all those celebrities and "youth" voters have a nasty habit of forgetting to show up at the polls to, you know, actually vote.
Which is all to say this isn't in the bag yet. I know, I know. That's almost impossible to believe. It's partly because Obama has waged a far superior campaign on all fronts. It's partly because John McCain isn't exactly igniting the soul of even his own party. Hell, when even the Wall Street Journal is giving editorial space to someone claiming McCain doesn't have a shot, it becomes very hard to believe that McCain has a shot.
But have a look at the polls. According to our big-city narrative, Obama should be ahead by about 600 points. He's not. Granted, as someone in the office has pointed out to me, Obama is an African-American first-term senator with a funny name, so that he's leading in the polls at all indicates a huge sea change in American politics. Then again, his opponent is a geriatric with a mean streak, a man who's been tagged "Bush the Second." He often looks like a dried-out mummy on TV and can't read a speech to save his life. He says things like, "We did a Google." McCain is unpopular even in his own party.
And yet they're still neck and neck in the polls. You should realize that. You should study those polls every day just as a reminder (and perhaps as a motivator). I don't want to be a downer, but I also don't want you collapsing into a state of shock in the event of a McCain victory. Maybe you should have an oxygen bag on hand and a personal flotation device. I'm of the school of thought that the president usually isn't as important as we think he is -- especially when it comes to the economy. But I'm afraid that if Obama loses, I'll wake up Wednesday morning to find that the major networks have forgotten to put stuff on the air. Marketers might call their agencies to find that no one's shown up for work. New York and L.A. might actually come to a standstill.
This might be a job for "Saturday Night Live," but I almost wonder if someone should do some public-service announcements in media offices and ad agencies, counseling employees what to do in the case of an Obama defeat. "Please do not panic. Breathe slowly. And while it is OK to cry, it is not OK to run out into the street and start breaking windows at the Gap."
Maybe it's because this has been a banner year for me in calling things wrong when it comes to politics, but I'm open to the fact that I could be wrong about the November outcome. All I'm saying is that you should be, too.
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!












I don't understand your obsession is with this "big-city narrative." It seems to me that YOU are the one with New York-centric frame of mind and are trying desperately to relate to the rest of us. Sure, a lot of people across non-LA or NY America will not vote for Obama, but... have you forgotten that a lot of people will?
And just some facts to point out - Obama and McCain aren't exactly neck and neck. Yes, it does seem like Obama should be further ahead, but last time I checked, he's about 6 points again. For a presidential election (which are usually within 1 or 2 points, if you look at history), that's pretty darn good!
And yes, we whipper-snapper voters don't usually bother to vote, but it seems that you forgot to mention that we showed up in record-breaking droves in the PRIMARIES earlier this year. One can only guess that we might fancy to do the same in the November election.
As for the outcome of the election, even if McCain summoned a miracle and won, I wouldn't throw myself off a building. McCain's an okay guy - it's not like he's George Bush! Besides, I'm still recovering from my 48-story free fall from 2004.
I have no doubt that YOU will keep your head on straight in the event of a loss. But I don't know the last time you've been to New York City. Even the Clinton supporters are looked upon with pity and disdain. All I know is that last time around, people were crying and screaming about John Kerry, a man about as inspiring as my left sock. This time around, I'm afraid that people might throw themselves out of windows or something.
In terms of the national polls, they're ultimately meaningless for a number of reasons (although that won't stop ME from quoting them!). Firstly, we don't vote as a nation. We vote state by state. Secondly, polls of registered voters aren't as reliable as polls of likely voters, which aren't as reliable as polls of active voters. (In a USAToday poll of LIKELY voters, McCain was ahead by four points).
But thanks for taking the time to read the post AND making reasonable commentary based on what you read -- you know, instead of reading two sentences, having a fit and then spouting paranoid gibberish (like some other people who will remain nameless).
The last time I was in NYC was November of 2000, so I'm a little out of touch. I'm surprised to learn that New Yorkers, of all people, don't have much love for Hillary! Interesting...
Good point about registered vs. likely voter polls.
Most of us in advertising, have had to remind clients that their opinion is just that, their opinion. How easily Wheaton slipped into a thought pattern so many of us mock in clients.
Perhaps you can join up with people who claim I'm a McCain-supporting Obama hater to form a consensus about who I'm actually in the tank for.
But seriously, I didn't say anywhere in this piece that people NOT voting for Barack Obama are dimwitted bigots. In fact, I try to remind people in New York all the time that the No. 1 reason people in other parts of the country aren't going to vote for Obama is because he's a Democrat. And, believe it or not, people in some parts of the country don't like Democrats, regardless of race or religion. They base that decision on economic, social and religious factors. They also base it on perceived support for the troops and patriotism (and a candidate like Obama is never going to win a patriotism fight with a Republican).
That said, I'm from Louisiana and go back often. So I know for a FACT that there are people in parts of the country that are running around claiming Barack Obama is a Muslim. I didn't get that from the New Yorker cover or from an article in the Times. I got that from talking to real live people. (Of course, on the flip-side, you have 'intelligent' Democrats in the Northeast who believe Dick Cheney is the Darth Vader in some sort of global shadow government run by Halliburton).
Below is a comment I posted today regarding the aforementioned subject. Please get a hold on the editorial people and get their act together. This type our writing ought to go into a blog for Ken to in invest his time on when he is looking for a new job.
As readers, we signed on to expand our understanding of the industry we are in, not listen to a punk lamenting over a vote of four ago.
Either your organization cleans up your editorial mission or we will have to clean up our opt in options to Adage.
Rafael Cabrera
.......................
Ken,
Stop whining and cover advertising, marketing, web stuff! I can't believe your editor allowed you to post this pathetic diatribe.
Maybe we need to cut down on reading Adage if we are going to be treated to this garbage. Eric Schmidt is right. It's lamentable how good reporting is going away and how this new media has fallen short of the opportunity.
Rafael A. Cabrera
San Diego, CA
Before you start lecturing anyone on the state of journalism today, you'd do well to learn the difference between a news article and a blog post. This piece is clearly housed in Campaign Trail, which is a blog. There are many opinions here, not all of them mine -- just as there are plenty of opinions all over AdAge.com. Then again, you seem to have misread the basic premise of the piece--which shouldn't suprise me coming from someone who sees fit to call people "punks." I was not lamenting the election of four years ago. I challenge you to find one sentence where it says I was sitting at my desk crying.
Since you and others seems so insistent that there be a lesson in everything posted on Ad Age, let me spell out the lesson for you: "When working in marketing and media, don't assume the rest of the country thinks like you and your friends do." I thought that was pretty obvious. Then again, it seems like plenty of people would rather skip over the reading/understanding portion and jump right to the outraged comments.