Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
Obama Turns to the Humble Infomercial
Maybe He's Trying to Win the Insomniac Vote
WASHINGTON (AdAge.com) -- The Obama campaign is the first to use a long-form infomercial during the 2008 presidential campaign.If you hadn't noticed, that may have been because the nearly 30-minute program aired at 1:30 a.m. Aug. 10 on ION Television.
The Obama campaign confirmed the airing of what it called a "long-form commercial" but provided no details and also declined to answer questions on why it ran the ad. The mostly biographical 28-minute, 30-second program included scenes of the Illinois senator's keynote speech to the 2004 Democratic National Convention as well as scenes from other campaign appearances along with background about Mr. Obama and frequent call-in numbers.
There was immediate speculation that the airing was a late-night test for whether the infomercial format could successfully generate contributions and calls. While Republican rival Sen. John McCain is accepting federal financing for the fall campaign, Mr. Obama has declined the funding and thus is unrestrained from spending limits, but must continue raising his own funds.
"It is a first. I guess they are going after the insomniac vote," said Evan Tracey, chief operating officer of TNS Media Intelligence's Campaign Media Analysis Group. He said the unusual airing time in fact appears to allow the campaign to test the effectiveness of the infomercial format without spending much.
Mr. Tracey said the infomercial is a first from any of the presidential campaigns this year, and may be the first from any of the presidential campaigns in years. In 1992, the Clinton campaign occasionally ran "A Man From Hope," a biography originally produced for the Democratic National Convention, as an infomercial. And in both 1992 and 1994, Reform Party candidate Ross Perot used infomercials as a mainstay of his advertising efforts.
UPDATE: According to the Obama campaign, "This was one more effective way for us to communicate with folks who may not normally see other communications we have with voters who are paying closer attention to the race."
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!












The reality is that if Obama gets the right people working with him on his direct response advertising, he will have a major weapon in his arsenal – a way to reach millions and millions of people EXTREMELY cost effectively with his message ... where he's not competing with McCain. It's wide open, undefended territory – the same territory, by the way, that has generated billions of dollars in sales for many businesses. If Obama has the right people, they'll be able to test different messages, track their effectiveness, and communicate to different people based on the issues that are important to them. He could target swing state voters and saturate them with his message.
So what should McCain's move be? For one, he'd better get a long form TV commercial developed, and he'd be well advised to get a solid direct response marketing team working for him. But that'll only match Obama, not beat him.
If McCain wants to outflank Obama, his best move is to go into direct response radio. Let's look at the many reasons: a) Obama isn't there – neither candidate is using direct response radio, b) DR radio is a whole new audience, not typically overlapping with TV, c) because you're using direct response techniques you get enormous bang for your buck, reaching huge number of people with limited dollars, d) you can target geographically and demographically with direct response radio (think swing states).