Edelman's Mom-Blog Maven: We Don't Do Paid-For Posts
Danielle Wiley Pioneers 2.0 Strategies at the Chicago Agency
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- As Edelman Chicago's senior VP for consumer brands social media, Danielle Wiley's job is to establish and manage 2.0 digital practices and strategies for the agency.
|
| Photo: Jessi Langsen |
| Listen to the audio interview now (above) with social media chief Danielle Wiley or download it as a podcast from iTunes (below). |
In an interview with Ad Age's Hoag Levins, Ms. Wiley discussed the new sort of in-house agency capabilities she is helping to define and deploy every day as well as the many ways that social-media implementation is changing Edelman Chicago.
Ad Age: How much has Edelman been changed by the social media revolution? And what role are social media projects actually playing in what Edelman does now -- as opposed to what it may have been doing, say, three years ago?
Ms. Wiley: The social media revolution has had a really big impact on the way that we do business at Edelman. Three or four years ago, social media was present and it was growing, but it was kind of seen as a separate tactic. So there was the primary PR program and then there would be social-media extensions. Today, it's completely integrated. I can't think of any programs that we do now that don't include social media. And we actually have programs now that are purely social media with no traditional PR. And I think it's not just Edelman.
|
| Photo: Jessi Langsen |
| Danielle Wiley is a senior VP at Edelman in Chicago. |
Ad Age: Tell me about your own Foodmomiac blog. Did you start that as part of your job or as a personal thing?
Ms. Wiley: I started Foodmomiac in 2005, before I joined Edelman. But it's had a really big influence on the way my team works and on the fact that I have this job at all. So everyone on my team is required to have a blog and they're all engaged in other social networks, as well, whether it's Twitter, Facebook, the 20-Something Network. As bloggers in the mom space, we all get pitched by other agencies so we're able to see, from the inside out, what's working and what doesn't work. And because we're all part of blogging communities, we can see trends as they're developing and we're able to see what's resonating within the particular niche groups that we're a part of.
Ad Age: How do do you select and qualify the bloggers that you use in Edelman marketing campaigns?
Ms. Wiley: We're not the type of agency that creates a list of 500 bloggers that we're going to pitch on any particular product. The list of bloggers that we want to work with for any one campaign is small. It's really targeted. Typically, it's made up of bloggers that we were already reading. We all have our RSS readers chock full of bloggers,
|
| Photo: Jessi Langsen |
| One new trend is for marketers to use a corps of bloggers in cause-marketing campaigns, such as those launched recently by the Quaker and Hebrew National brands. |
Ad Age: That's clearly a huge amount of work. How many people does it take to do this?
Ms. Wiley: My social media team within consumer brands, it's just four of us; obviously, we can't do everything. But the way Edelman works, we have some really intense training internally so everyone at the company -- from the presidents on down to the interns are trained. We have in-person training and online training to make sure that everyone is up to speed on how to research, how to read through blogs to find blogs that are appropriate, how to outreach in a way that's appropriate and fits within our standards. And we're constantly working to educate everyone. And in terms of our social media team, we do what we can to make sure that everyone knows how to conduct themselves properly and how to find the right people for a project.
Ad Age: And how hard has it been to get the older veterans at Edelman to buy into this?
Ms. Wiley: Edelman's been around for a long time but I think for anyone who's in marketing, you know that things are changing all the time and this is just yet a new morphing of the way that products are marketed. So we see a lot of excitement about getting to know these new technologies. We actually have this really cool program that just started last summer called ROTNEMs, which is "mentor" written backwards. So we have the 22- and 23-year-olds -- the digital mavens who've grown up doing some of this stuff -- serving as reverse mentors to EVPs, SVPs, sitting with them once a week, showing them how to Twitter, how to text-message from their BlackBerry, how to update their Facebook page. This program has been a huge success and everyone's kind of having a blast doing it. It's definitely had a positive impact on the campaigns that we're doing as well.
Ad Age: You mentioned the issue of bloggers' ethics and that's become quite a big issue with Mommy bloggers of late.
Ms. Wiley: There's been a huge increase in the visibility of mom bloggers and the tactics that marketers are using to reach out to them. So we're seeing the splashy trips to Disney, private tours of manufacturing facilities. We saw two bloggers, a couple of weeks ago, brought to a red-carpet premiere, meeting Ben Stiller, and so forth. And along with that come the blog posts that talk about the perks. There are posts that aren't transparent but readers and the government -- certainly now with the FTC stepping in -- are beginning to demand more accountability. I think, as with any publishing medium, a blatant, positive post that was clearly paid for is going to engender less trust than an editorial review that's fully transparent and disclosed. I think, as marketers, we need to work really hard on our end to ensure that we're requiring full disclosure.
At Edelman, there have been instances where we've refused to work with bloggers who aren't going to disclose properly. We've reached out to them with a product, and asked them to review it; they've come back to us and offered to do a positive review in return for pay. We don't do that. We said no. Blatantly positive posts that are clearly a result of free perks aren't helping anyone. They don't help the marketer and ultimately they don't help the blogger, as readers are going to have less trust in her written word. So insisting on disclosure and transparency is key. I think the bloggers that have always been transparent and have always disclosed feel that they're being damaged by those who are not disclosing. Liz Gumbinner, a popular blogger who we read, recently wrote that as a blogger who's always been disclosing and being transparent, she feels her reputation is somewhat being marred by this negative halo effect of the bloggers who are not disclosing. And so I think we're going to see some policing coming internally from the bloggers themselves.
Ad Age: How big an audience can you actually reach with these blogging programs and how does it compare with the reach of traditional media?
Ms. Wiley: It's hard to compare social media and traditional media. We don't have as many good measurement standards in place. It's difficult to know the reach or the number of page views of any one blog. A blog's audience can be much smaller than that of a print publication but the readers can also be very influential. So we'll see blog posts that show up a few months later, in a print publication. We know that many of the readers of blogs are bloggers themselves, which can also have an exponential effect on the influence. So it's complicated. We're still navigating how to best measure this.Ad Age: Are your clients generally comfortable with that?
Ms. Wiley: They certainly do expect the traditional measurement standards. They want to see impressions. They want to see reach. So we do a lot of educating. While you can't necessarily always determine page views for blog, we are able to get a sense of the number of subscribers to a blog. We are able to see what type of comments are being generated. And we're able to see when people are linking to a blog post. So a lot of it's about education. And before we start a campaign, we set out very clearly what we can and what we can't measure. We come up with some benchmarks that we'd like to reach and we just continue to educate, throughout the entire campaign, so that clients don't feel in the dark. They understand that it's different from traditional media. They really do understand that this is true engagement. And so while you might not be reaching as many people, it might be readers that are a lot more targeted and a lot more meaningful. And they're starting to really understand that that's just as valuable as pure numbers.
Ad Age: And is there anything else about the current agency use of bloggers that you think is important or particularly interesting?
Ms. Wiley: One trend that we're seeing is that if we can help bloggers use their reach to effect positive change in the community, that that can be a really successful way to market a product and to help others. We did this with Quaker earlier this year when we worked with mom bloggers to donate time and product to food banks across the country. This past weekend, Hebrew National did something along these same lines. It had what were called Picnics with a Purpose in parks across the country. Bloggers got together to raise money and that was really successful as well. It's a trend that we're going to see more of, especially as the economy continues to struggle. It's just a really great way [for marketers] to reach out to help bloggers help others with their reach.













However I think it's important to point out that while moms with blogs have borne the brunt of the media scrutiny about "blogola" and ethics over recent months, it's been prevalent for years among tech bloggers, cosmetic bloggers, fashion bloggers, food bloggers, entertainment bloggers and beyond. The trick is to stay true to your brand--and your audience--regardless of who offers you theater tickets or a free bottle of stain remover. Heck, media planners have managed to do it for years. Right?
Liz Gumbinner
Publisher, Editor in Chief CoolMomPicks.com
There are quite a few PR firms who contact me but very few have what Edelman has; smarts.
What I especially appreciate about Edelman, and a very small handful of other companies, is the ability to recognize bloggers aren't monolithic. When Edelman reaches out to me, I know the person who is contacting me has done his/her homework and is familiar with BOTH my personal and professional platforms.
If Edelman was jumping off a bridge and asking me to jump too, I'd have a hard time telling them no. This company? They have taken risks, and have come out swimmingly. And no, I wasn't offered a box of Chewy's to say that either. ; )
Devra S. Renner
www.parentopia.com
I have only had good experiences with this agency (the Pledge NYC Blogger Event was an especially good outreach) and have never felt compelled to provide anything other than my honest assessment of their clients' products and/or services.
-Kimberly/Mom in the City
I think if a pay-for-comments blogger approach a company/client directly you might have a bigger battle as they might only be considering short term benefits. Its freshing to see that you are standing your ground.
Around the measurement issue, tagging of links within the article with Google Analytics Campaign code will show you the require data.
http://thelostagency.wordpress.com
What I would like to see is some serious consideration to the mothers that are clearly taken advantage of all over the web.
Additionally, I met Liz at a Hersheys conference a few months ago and find it ironic she was quoted here as she and I had an interesting conversation about Moms and Companies and she made it clear she felt Walmart was seriously taking advantage of the Walmart 11 moms by not paying them for their time and expertise.
Bloggers do need to self police a bit to keep ethics high, but so do agencies. I received a pitch today that started "Dear Stacey". It would be nice to see agencies get it right as a company before I have to start worrying about getting it right as a stay at home mom that isnt being paid to post about a snackcake.
One thing I have started doing is valuing my time a lot more than PR and stop falling into the trap of a free product or trip versus my own self worth and time. Mom Blogging used to be about community, now its turned into an ad ridden, social twittering micro-blogging network.
If we are not careful, the bit of influence we do have on our audience will be as lost as the ads in newspapers.
I just sure hope that Mom Bloggers start valuing their time more than the PR agencies do.
~Trisha Haas
MomDot.com
MomDot.com/blog
My issue with the 11 moms of WalMart is that they act as consultants; they are participating in focus groups, interacting with WalMart suppliers, lending expertise, taking to the press and disseminating information on WalMart's behalf, all without pay. It is a consultancy role and should be a paid one. That is markedly different than those bloggers who seek to "review" products for pay.
If you believe your time is not well spent reviewing products or hosting giveaways, and these things are not driving enough traffic to your site for you to profit off your ad sales, perhaps you need to reconsider your business model.
Liz Gumbinner
www.CoolMomPicks.com
I'd love to see some numbers from these mom bloggers on whether they're really making enough money from ads and AdSense etc. on their blogs, or not.
I still believe it's possible for a blogger to be paid as long as they are not 100% positive about their review. If they include the good and the bad, that's real life, and the marketer/advertiser gets their exposure, it's all authentic, and that's good for everyone.
Bloggers not getting paid, since they're not employed journalists on salary, doesn't strike me as fair. And I'm just not certain these bloggers get enough traffic to make enough money off ads.