More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Digital
Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters

MSN Gets a Makeover, but Does New Look Matter?

Legacy Portal Is All Spruced up in Bid to Fend off Facebook -- and Don't Discount Its Importance to Microsoft

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- MSN is getting its first major redesign in more than a decade in a bid to dust off its late-'90s look, reduce clutter and, as Yahoo did earlier this year, give users the ability to interact with their social networks from its home page.

The question remains: Does it matter?

MSN's leaner new look rolls out today.
MSN's leaner new look rolls out today.
It does if they want to maintain share against Facebook, which now accounts for 11% of all time spent on the web and has more than doubled over the past year. Like Yahoo, MSN is bringing social tools right onto the page, in the hope it will remain the on-ramp to the web in an era of Facebook and Twitter.

Less clutter
As part of the redesign, which goes live today, MSN is removing text ads and limiting display ads to a single unit on the right, and a small second ad halfway down the page. While it hasn't done a top-to-bottom redesign, AOL has reduced ad loads on its front page as well. Microsoft is also eliminating 50% of the links and simplified navigation across fewer categories.

"Consumers told us they were suffering from information overload," said MSN's general manager, Scott Moore. "One of the things we wanted to do with this redesign is surface content in a less-cluttered way."

MSN's redesign comes five months after rival Yahoo redesigned its front page, and there are plenty of similarities, as the new look incorporates more white space and integrates social-media tools. Nielsen stats show Yahoo's audience as flat since then, but in an age of Facebook, that's not a bad thing.

"For Yahoo to retain its market share is itself a victory," said Jon Gibbs, VP of analytics at Nielsen.

Once, this was the battle to be the web's front door, but now the Big Three legacy web portals -- MSN, Yahoo and AOL -- are happy when they can retain the share they have. Yahoo's $100 million global "It's You" campaign is about defending its position in the U.S. and growing it abroad.

Consider: In 2005, AOL, MSN and Yahoo accounted for a combined 30% of all time spent on the web in the U.S., according to Nielsen. Today, they account for a combined 17%. In September, the average Facebook user spends 5.5 hours on the social network per month, while MSN users spend 2 hours, Yahoo users spend 3 hours and AOL users spend 2.5 hours.

Importance to Microsoft
Still, the 17% share means the death of the portal has been greatly exaggerated, and MSN boasts the largest global audience of any of the three. Moreover, MSN is a key audience vehicle for Microsoft to drive adoption of technologies such as Silverlight, Internet Explorer, Windows 7 and search engine Bing.com.

MSN is the largest single source of referrals for Bing.com, which will get deeper integration into shopping, travel and local categories. Bing.com search queries will also inform what links appear on the home page.

"We can order content and put it on MSN with the assumption that if people are searching on it there is a much larger audience," Moore said.

Rather than produce its own content, MSN is focused on joint ventures, such as the deal with production company BermanBraun for celebrity channel Wonderwall, news content from MSNBC and NBC News and Fox Sports, and entertainment and lifestyle content from Hulu and Hearst.


4 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: MSN Gets a Makeover, but Does New Look Matter?
  By millytant | London November 4, 2009 09:33:57 am:
Late 90's look is a good look - familiar and trusted. it may have taken MS over two decades to finally be more trusted and now they plan to shoot themselves in the foot.

Tut tut, rolls eyes.


http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pasty-Muncher/56502401201 http://www.pastymuncher.co.uk
  By DOUG | PLYMOUTH, MN November 4, 2009 11:24:44 am:
good
  By sheiglagh | Dallas, TX November 4, 2009 12:02:35 pm:
Yes, new look does matter and don't discount Yahoo or MSN even if Twitter and Facebook are leading right now.

Remember when Second Life was the place to be? Look at it now! Except for a few mention, no one goes there.

I have an account at Facebook, and it is great to connect with old friends that I have lost touch with - like friends from high school and college. But, we did not stay in Facebook. We started sending emails and we picked up the phone!

Facebook is also a great place to upload photos and share with other friends and family members and you just need basic computer skills for that.

Truth is, there is a life cycle for every product. Case in point - Geocities which was owned by Yahoo was the place to be in the 1990s if you want to build a webpage and share your photos, etc. Now it's closed because people found WordPress, Blogger, Typepad and of course Facebook.

To me, HOORAY!!! for MSN. There is room for everyone in the world we call a web.
  By aleghart | Whittier, CA November 4, 2009 01:08:32 pm:
I think an important measurement to make is how many of these eyeballs are viewing MSN only because it was the default setting upon installing Microsoft's operating system.

My grandparents have owned several VCRs over the years. I don't honestly believe that they prefer seeing "12:00" blink versus knowing the actual time.

But until somebody makes the change for them, novice users will use whatever is put in front of them.

That's the attraction to AOL. Everything is served up in a comfortable window.

Is it relevant? Not sure. My grandparents don't buy video tapes. Nor, I imagine, did they rent more than a handful every year. Most were home movies or hand-me-downs brought over by the kids and grandchildren.

How involved are the MSN users? Clickers? Buyers? Active and valuable to your advertisers? Do they actually generate content to drive up the site activity and time-on-page?

Or, are they the same crowd who watches "12:00" and never spends a dime?
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News