November 24, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Cuil Needs a Chill Pill

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Iron Man
Iron Man
In this superhero-obsessed summer, it's about time everyone found an underdog to root for. In a feat as inexplicable as Tony Stark fashioning scrap metal into an Iron Man suit in an Afghan prison, Cuil.com gained almost iPhone-like levels of publicity for its launch yesterday. Yet Cuil (pronounced "cool" -- get ready for a new swath of Web 2.0 words that don't sound anything like how they're spelled) is due for a run-in with Mr. Freeze as its media mojo gets put on ice.

Google Trends, a service of Cuil's arch-enemy, calls Cuil's rise today "volcanic," but the hype will die down, and then Cuil will have to prove itself. That's not going to be easy. The top five search engines -- Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL and Ask.com -- have maintained their oligopoly for years. Other mass-market search engine start-ups have fared poorly as destination sites. This won't be the case forever; all hierarchies are ultimately disrupted. If you're going to place a bet, though, the incumbents hold the cards, and they don't have term limits.

As for Cuil.com, as a search engine it's going to need to function better than it does today. The layout -- three columns with paragraphs and tabs -- takes getting used to and may actually slow down the scanning process. There are thumbnail images with the search results, but the images are sometimes wrong for at least one of the searches on a results page. Cuil does have some features for refining searches, but is that enough?

Currently, there's no advertising, though that will change in time. It took Google years to roll out AdWords; Cuil won't have that luxury. The biggest question will be whether it will have enough devoted users for campaigns to scale once the ads start appearing. The safe bet is still on Batman-esque Google, not Cuil the Ant Man.

~ ~ ~
David Berkowitz is director of emerging media for 360i. He has written dozens of articles covering media, marketing and technology for several trade publications over the past decade. Mr. Berkowitz has spoken at Digital Hollywood, Ad:Tech, SMX, OMMA and dozens of industry events, and he blogs extensively, contributing to MarketingVox, nowEurope, AdTechBlog and others. He is frequently quoted online and in print on technology, advertising and media trends.
9 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Cuil Needs a Chill Pill
  By Dan | Rochester, NY July 29, 2008 11:28:38 am:
Based on my first test, CUIL gets a failing grade so far. As with many companies, our domain name is our company name, but my search by company name did not yield our website. Instead, it found a few business directory listings for our company and a bunch of unrelated stuff.
  By electronimo | Miami, FL July 29, 2008 11:31:03 am:
well written article here. i tried out cuil and it really wasn't that impressive. I would hardly say it was that cool of an experience and not nearly enough to warrant all the mega hype. We all love to root for the "underdog" not sure if this is really the case. We have an ex-google super exec- sounds like more of an disgruntled former employee than a worthy advirsary. You should do some more demos before you waste your hype time and minute of exposure. The site is not that good. Good luck with that- your really Your gonna need it.
  By lfgbear | CHANDLER, AZ July 29, 2008 12:06:32 pm:
Cuil is pathetic. I have worked my way up to multiple top ten hits on Google and Yahoo searches for my name and my book. Cuil couldn't find me and while my book hits number one, my amazon listing is not even in the top ten.

B.L.
http://SoIwroteThisBook.com
  By mfinzel | Colorado Spgs, CO July 29, 2008 12:06:58 pm:
I agree with Dan. Based on initial tests it definitely fails. The results never seem intuitive to what you were actually looking for.

The most interesting failure is searching for "Cuil". Cuil's own website, or any information about it, doesn't even appear in the first page of search results.
  By CATHERINE | LOS GATOS, CA July 29, 2008 12:24:08 pm:
It's this simple - Cuil doesn't deliver. Disappointment with search content, image delivery, and time to results. I'm sticking with Google for many reasons.
Marsha Keeffer
www.rubiconconsulting.com
  By earonc | Gainesville, GA July 29, 2008 12:55:35 pm:
I saw the announcement. I tried cuil. It did not give me the results I was looking for. I tried the advance version and still missed. They simply have not crawled through enough sites yet. I agree that simply entering a domain name should return specific information I expect to see. I'll check back again in a year to see where they are (if they are still there).
  By copyguy | Singapore, NA July 30, 2008 12:19:52 am:
For a small business owner like me, CUIL fails the most basic test: when I search for my company name or website, it doesn't show up. Google, Yahoo and MSN does. If my potential clients used CUIL, they won't even know I exist. Big thumbs down.
  By BL | NEW YORK, NY August 1, 2008 12:26:35 pm:
CUIL sucks. When I type in my name, it has only a fraction of Google's results, and many of the ones it has aren't actually about me, just mentions of my name.

Not only that, there's a bio of me with someone else's picture. Who is that woman? Sheesh!
  By fnewbold | ST THOMAS, VI August 5, 2008 11:46:02 am:
Wow! Totally irrelevant information! really useless search on "US Virgin Islands" I just tried Viewzi and I was impressed with the returned info. Much more relevant and justified listings!



Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News