November 23, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Why the Four C's of Community Require the Commitment of Many

Let Content, Context, Connectivity and Continuity Guide Your Efforts

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Have you ever given serious thought as to why marketers are so infatuated with the idea of "viral"? Think about it. Viral is actually pretty easy to wrap your head around. For starters, it's not difficult to measure. Views in YouTube, the number of times a video was embedded, the number of comments, the number of times a Facebook application has been downloaded or shared and the last time it was used. They are all measurable. And like traditional marketing, they're pretty easy to walk away from.
Pampers Village blends content, tools and social functionality based on the insight that parents want to connect and naturally form communities both online and off.
Pampers Village blends content, tools and social functionality based on the insight that parents want to connect and naturally form communities both online and off.

If you are fortunate enough to hit the "viral video" jackpot, for example, you can sit back and watch as the infectious behavior kicks in. No wonder marketers can't get away from the idea of viral. The problem with it, however, is that the odds are not in your favor. My writing may be influenced by the fact that I'm doing it on a plane on my way to Las Vegas for the WOMMA (Word of Mouth Marketing Association) summit. But, I'm also pretty sure that the stats back up my claim, as there are relatively few of the "Subservient Chicken" and Dove "Real Beauty" examples compared to the thousands of initiatives launched that hope to be the next one.

So let's forget the "V" word for a moment and talk about the "C" word: community. Chances are that this is a word that's come up nearly as often as "viral." But unlike viral, community requires a different set of objectives, strategy and tactics around measurement. Yet, intuitively, brands realize there is value to them. That's because if we take our bright and shiny marketing hats off for a moment, we realize that it's likely we are part of them. From Apple to Mini Cooper, many brands already have millions of fans participating in some form of community around the brand, official or unofficial. People who use social networks also feel like they're part of a larger community of people they relate to. Twitter, for example, has this effect, especially when many of us actually make efforts to meet each other in real life or just connect digitally. Just ask the "Motrin Moms."

But brands need to know a few things before they head down the community path. The web is saturated with communities. Some, like WebMD, are thriving, while others have come and gone. The starting point to any community is finding a niche that is currently underserved and serving that community better than anyone else. For example, I'm a member of the IXDA (Interaction Design Association), a community that sprung up because there was a void between information architects and designers. Brands do potentially have opportunities to act as what I'll call "facilitators," but they have to be willing to start with a bit if research and then ask themselves if they are really willing to do what it takes to start and maintain a community.

The tools aren't the issue -- by using services such as Ning, any brand can build a community without investing in heavy infrastructure. Or they can add community functions through solutions offered by companies such as Pluck. Communities can be used for consumer research, too. Leverage Software creates internal communities around products, brands and organizations which can be positioned to test ideas. Critical Mass, the company I work for, even has an internal group called "Curious" dedicated to polling communities that we help pull together for the purpose of gleaning insights.

And of course there's always the option to customize and build as we did on our recently on Pampers Village. For P&G we teamed up with both technical partners as well as global agencies such as Saatchi. Together we built the beginnings of a branded community that blends content, tools and social functionality, all based on the insight that parents want to connect and naturally form communities both online and off. But I'm getting ahead of myself. Before even thinking of a community initiative, consider the following "Four C's" as a high-level framework:

Content
Quality content is a great way to attract the people who are needed to form the elusive community that your brand is hoping to help build. When considering community initiatives, there are three questions to ask: Where will the content come from? Does it provide indisputable value? Can a regular flow of quality content be maintained? Even pre-Web 2.0 initiatives such as beinggirl.com, another P&G-powered community for female teens grappling with relevant topics, have to focus on keeping the content itself fresh and relevant.

Context
Context means understanding how to meet people where they are and serving them the right experience at the right time. Well-designed applications and functionality have great opportunities to deliver on context. For example, Facebook's recently updated iPhone app is perfectly designed for contextual usage on the go.
Suggested Links:
It's my favorite way to stay in touch with my Facebook community, which I prefer to do while away from the PC. Context means investing time in knowing how your users will want to engage with their community -- then enabling them to do so.

Connectivity
Communities thrive on squishy, hard-to-measure activities that are relationship-based at the root. It's not about mass communications but more about the micro-interactions which I've talked about at great length. Designing experiences that support thousands of micro-interactions means you are making a commitment vs. trying to produce a one-hit wonder. Communities can in theory be the new CRM (Customer Relationship Management), but require people to mind them. Community software platforms such as Liveworld offer moderation services. If you've invested in building a community framework, you need to play host if you're lucky enough for guests to arrive.

Continuity
Communities that thrive often evolve to meet the needs of users. As mentioned earlier, we launched our Pampers Village which includes a baby name finder, parent blogs, forums and a non-traditional navigation design that tags topics and references relevant products. Communities such as this and others need to be flexible to evolve while still providing a valuable and consistent user experience which can be sustained.

The bottom line is that building a community looks less like marketing and more like customer relationship management, and it takes the combined effort of different disciplines to even get one off the ground. It's not a campaign you can launch and walk away from. If you are fortunate enough to champion a brand that has the potential to draw people who want to connect, or are associated with an underserved niche -- then it's worth investigating. But know that you are in for the long haul and it won't be easy.
12 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Why the Four C's of Community Require the Commitment of Many
  By ADMAVEN | Chicago, IL November 20, 2008 01:56:39 pm:
Fantastic article - makes salient a lot of points that I try to get across to clients and agency coworkers alike.

http://admaven.blogspot.com
  By AllisonR | Sydney Australia November 22, 2008 11:23:17 am:
I think there should also be another C and that is "Can't be Forced". After spending many many years on the internet in and organising various communities, the very last thing anyone should be doing is trying to drive rather than participate within their community.
  By aweinroth | Pluck | Austin, TX November 25, 2008 01:37:12 pm:
David, insightful article and worth reading for any brand or agency professional trying to rationalize and integrate social media with the rest of the marketing plan.

At Pluck, we see genuine participation (you mentioned as part of Connectivity) as extremely high leverage for customers. Getting a real representative of the company involved to "stir the pot" pays dividends on social media investments every time.

Another hidden C that you touch on is Commitment, which is best exhibited when social media initiatives are integrated with the whole marketing effort, holistically. Isolated social marketing can sometimes yield isolated results - there's certainly nothing wrong with starting small, but it's critical to think BIG about how social media can be woven into the broader marketing strategies.

We see these concepts working rather well for brands like Scotts, Kraft, Dallas Cowboys and Whole Foods, and fully expect continued innovation along these lines in 2009.

http://twitter.com/aweinroth
  By governor1 | Mechelen, NY November 25, 2008 02:16:34 pm:
Hey, I've created a page where you can calculate how many views you YouTube videos will get. You can also determine if your video is viral or not.

Check it out here: http://www.squidoo.com/youtube-super-star

Enjoy
  By viewrcorp | SAN DIEGO, CA November 25, 2008 03:55:59 pm:
Very insightful hints and tips that will help us with our nascent Community. www.viewrGlobalCommunity.com.


Thanks !


--- Karl Lingenfelder
  By David | Chicago, IL November 25, 2008 04:06:32 pm:
Nicholas, thanks. I'm glad you found this helpful and applicable to both clients and co-workers.

Allison, I could not agree more, this is a trait that communities do share with "viral" neither can be forced.

Adam, although you are a vendor in this space, it's good to know there are brands actively creating these spaces. Case studies like these will help provide more learnings along the way.

One more thing. Communities require human intervention. Just like the time I took to read all of the comments and address some of them. That speaks to commitment as brought up by Adam.
  By servantofchaos | North Sydney November 25, 2008 06:55:27 pm:
Agree, David. We tend to look at "viral" as being a substitute for reach - but that is just the first step - because unlike broadcast media, the web is interactive. That means that we can prompt immediate action, engage and discuss. What is the strategy and the story that will lead consumers from the viral base to our brand? That's community. And that's the real opportunity.
  By vasconcj | San Francisco, CA November 25, 2008 07:49:58 pm:
I definitely agree with Allison on the value of authenticity in a community. Virality can help bring users through the door, but an authentic community is the only way to engage them so that they want to keep coming back every day and telling their friends.

Julio Vasconcellos, http://experienceproject.com
  By cramster | Pasadena, CA November 25, 2008 09:16:57 pm:
I couldn't agree more with Allison's additional C for "Can't be Forced." Take a look at some of the most viral videos, for example, and you'll find a wide assortment of wacky and unique content. Trying to re-create that content is the kind of hindsight marketing that audiences are most likely to tune out.

Focus efforts on creating not to more of the same, but communities rich in the 4 C's discussed above (actually, I suppose there are 5 or 6 C's now). I'll add to that list: How about a C for credit? Give audiences credit where credit is due. They are smart enough to cut through the viral and see a community for its content value.
  By rastheather | Cedar Rapids, IA November 25, 2008 11:53:27 pm:
I really enjoyed this piece, David. You seem to have the rare dual talents of both simple/stunning visual design and strong written communication; many of us lean one way or the other.

A good portion of this article resonated with my belief that as humans, we each have a desire to belong, to be included and considered. In my opinion, one factor in the success of such endeavors as you describe include constructing both the intrinsic inclusive (one of many like-minded individuals) appeal, and the exclusive draw ("A loving parent? Join us to learn...") that's often worked into the messaging.

Furthermore, maybe "Cultivate" could also join the tenets you suggest, or perhaps its implied. As you wrote, successful brands will be those in it for the long haul, through good and bad decisions. Working hard to sustain relationships once forged, maintaining community is a metaphor for being a good friend.

Thanks for the memorable read. Heather Rast

http://insightsandingenuity.com http://twitter.com/heatherrast
  By juliecamp | Santa Monica, CA November 26, 2008 03:35:38 am:
David,

Couldn't agree more with your analysis. You mention that Community is closer to customer relationship management than it is to marketing. I feel Community is a new form of Marketing. Marketing is about understanding your customer needs and wants and addressing them with the right products and offers and building loyalty over time with that brand/product. Community offers marketers a real time window into customer needs and the ability to test concepts and ideas with immediate feedback. It also gives them direct access to their most passionate users and establishes a dialogue with them, which, if managed well and with authenticity, can yield amazing loyalty and value.

Amongst other sites, Demand Media manages LIVESTRONG.COM and eHow.com, both of which rely heavily on their community base. Within my team I have dedicated community managers on both sites, and see it as a major part of our marketing plan. It takes commitment and it's not a campaign based tactic, but the value of each community member is disproportionately high in comparison to a casual user of the site.

I think more and more marketers will be dedicating parts of their resources and budgets to building communities around their brands.
  By BryanPerson | San Jose, CA November 26, 2008 08:54:22 am:
David:

Very good, thoughtful column here, and thank you for mentioning LiveWorld (we do work for both the Pampers and MINI Cooper communities that you referenced).

I see Connectivity as the most important "C" in your list. What keeps community members coming back again and again? It's the personal connections they make and the real relationships they build within the community. Marketers (with the help of in-the-trenches community managers and social hosts) who can foster that ongoing sense of connection/purpose for and between members, will ultimately have the most vibrant communities of all.

Love this line from your piece: "It's not a campaign you can launch and walk away from." Well said. From our work on scores of communities over the years, we know that most take time to grow, mature, and thrive -- typically at least 3-6 months. This is a concept that isn't always music to a marketer's ears, specifically one who wants to execute a short *campaign* rather than build a long-lasting community.

Bryan Person | http://www.twitter.com/BryanPerson
LiveWorld
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News