Facebook Lite Is a Black Hole for Brands
Many of the Tools Marketers Use Aren't Present
| |
| David Berkowitz | |
Brands with Facebook Pages get short-changed here. You can't find Pages in the search results on Lite, even if you're already a fan; only people show up. There are no engagement ads -- just minimalist self-service ads with text, thumbnails, and a link. Updates from Pages don't appear in your Lite inbox. Branded Pages' status updates still appear in the News Feed, and you can click that to go to the Page, but there's just the stripped down Wall rather than all the tabs (there's still a link to the Page's photos and videos). It's yet another reminder for Page owners that to stay top of mind with consumers, it's important to post updates regularly. Developing an editorial calendar can help achieve that goal.

Second, most Facebook users who try Lite will wind up missing some of the full functionality, whether it's instant messaging or applications or the easier way links appear when including them in status updates. There will be people out there like Mashable's Stan Schroeder who talk about how they prefer Lite, but I'll wager he's well in the minority, and even most of the Stans out there will wind up defaulting to the original. Even some dial-up users will probably choose the original rather than give up features like IM.
Brands should keep an eye on this though. One way is to check Quantcast's Lite traffic report (non-existent so far) and other sources to see if it gains momentum. The safer bet is that it will keep a small percentage of consumers loyal and addicted to Facebook without changing the habits of anyone else.
| ABOUT THE AUTHOR | |
|
David Berkowitz is director of emerging media for 360i. He blogs regularly at Inside the Marketer's Studio and 360i's Digital Connections. He also contributed to the just-released Social Marketing Playbook. |
|













2 - Despite how much people hate ADS on Facebook, they do enjoy interacting with brands on the platform (http://mashable.com/2009/08/31/social-media-brands/)
With that key element missing, people won't be able to participate in contest or vent their customer service issues on the fan page. Maybe those aren't reasons people joined FB initially but they are certainly components people have come to employ on the regular
@Aerocles
The only thing missing was Chat, but the regular version doesn't give her a way to know who is online and available to chat anyway.
Facebook has long been a usability and navigation nightmare, and many people have complained about it. Those complaints -- and not lack of broadband access -- is most likely why Facebook rolled out this version of the site.
It seems to me that rather than whine that a more user-friendly site does not serve advertisers well, it might be smarter for advertisers and brands to figure out how to roll with this. Actually using Facebook to *converse directly with people*, rather than just try to push clutter-prone "engagement ads" at Facebook users, would probably work better.
- Amy Gahran
Here are details about it http://blog.digitalingredients.co.uk/2009/09/facebook-lite-big-opportunity-from.html
What's your take?