November 23, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Facebook Lite Is a Black Hole for Brands

Many of the Tools Marketers Use Aren't Present

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

David Berkowitz
David Berkowitz
Facebook Lite is a new streamlined version designed for people with slow internet connections. There's no chat and no applications. It's designed to give users quick access to their News Feed, inbox and events. Oddly though, it still includes a "post video" button -- who would do that on such a slow connection? I often can't do that with broadband.

Brands with Facebook Pages get short-changed here. You can't find Pages in the search results on Lite, even if you're already a fan; only people show up. There are no engagement ads -- just minimalist self-service ads with text, thumbnails, and a link. Updates from Pages don't appear in your Lite inbox. Branded Pages' status updates still appear in the News Feed, and you can click that to go to the Page, but there's just the stripped down Wall rather than all the tabs (there's still a link to the Page's photos and videos). It's yet another reminder for Page owners that to stay top of mind with consumers, it's important to post updates regularly. Developing an editorial calendar can help achieve that goal.

Facebook Lite
Facebook Lite
Facebook Lite could be bad news for brands if consumers adopt it en masse, but that's not likely for two reasons. First, the percentage of home internet users with broadband access is reportedly well over 90%. The sound of modems dialing up is quickly being relegated to those "when I was a kid..." stories, like the one my dad tells about walking to school 20 miles in the snow being chased by German shepherds. Stories of 1,200 baud modems sound even less believable.

Second, most Facebook users who try Lite will wind up missing some of the full functionality, whether it's instant messaging or applications or the easier way links appear when including them in status updates. There will be people out there like Mashable's Stan Schroeder who talk about how they prefer Lite, but I'll wager he's well in the minority, and even most of the Stans out there will wind up defaulting to the original. Even some dial-up users will probably choose the original rather than give up features like IM.

Brands should keep an eye on this though. One way is to check Quantcast's Lite traffic report (non-existent so far) and other sources to see if it gains momentum. The safer bet is that it will keep a small percentage of consumers loyal and addicted to Facebook without changing the habits of anyone else.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
David Berkowitz is director of emerging media for 360i. He blogs regularly at Inside the Marketer's Studio and 360i's Digital Connections. He also contributed to the just-released Social Marketing Playbook.
4 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Facebook Lite Is a Black Hole for Brands
  By Dteicher | Fair Lawn, NJ September 11, 2009 02:08:25 pm:
I agree that it won't find widespread adoption for two reasons. 1 - that you mentioned, is the lack of features that people will miss.

2 - Despite how much people hate ADS on Facebook, they do enjoy interacting with brands on the platform (http://mashable.com/2009/08/31/social-media-brands/)

With that key element missing, people won't be able to participate in contest or vent their customer service issues on the fan page. Maybe those aren't reasons people joined FB initially but they are certainly components people have come to employ on the regular

@Aerocles
  By ikepigott | Birmingham, AL September 11, 2009 06:14:28 pm:
I showed the Lite interface to a coworker who is blind, and she said the streamlined and stripped-down version is a big help to her.

The only thing missing was Chat, but the regular version doesn't give her a way to know who is online and available to chat anyway.
  By Amy | Nowhere, CA September 11, 2009 08:24:22 pm:
I haven't had a chance to explore Facebook Lite much yet, but I look forward to it. I have broadband and I'm an avid user of social media. But I've shied away from using Facebook much because its cluttered user interface drives me bananas.

Facebook has long been a usability and navigation nightmare, and many people have complained about it. Those complaints -- and not lack of broadband access -- is most likely why Facebook rolled out this version of the site.

It seems to me that rather than whine that a more user-friendly site does not serve advertisers well, it might be smarter for advertisers and brands to figure out how to roll with this. Actually using Facebook to *converse directly with people*, rather than just try to push clutter-prone "engagement ads" at Facebook users, would probably work better.

- Amy Gahran
  By stefanomaggi | Milan September 13, 2009 03:41:22 am:
Facebook Lite is also for slow connections, but I'm not sure this is its core objective. I think it can be a way for Facebook to test Twitter interaction model and to force brands towards interaction and engagement, returning to the social network's essence.

Here are details about it http://blog.digitalingredients.co.uk/2009/09/facebook-lite-big-opportunity-from.html

What's your take?
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News