November 25, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


An Open Letter to CEOs of Social-Network Sites: Get a Relationship Point Person

Especially If You Want Brands to Commit to You for the Long Term

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Ian Schafer Ian Schafer
Dear [insert social-network CEO name here],

I recently spoke to Silicon Alley Insider about why social-networking sites still haven't begun to realize their revenue potential, and I said: What the social-networking properties should have is a relationship expert or a user advocate who would also work with the advertisers.

Banners alone aren't going to cut it. Regardless of how much inventory you have, CPMs are going to continue to decrease because those banners lack effectiveness. And the advertisers that are willing to buy only that inventory are not going to be the brands you want to have long, big-revenue relationships with. Not that revenue from the same dating-site-shilling, mortgage-brokering, free-iPod-offering advertisers you're getting (and consumers are ignoring) now is a bad thing, but it won't be the difference in helping your property fulfill its true potential.

You need a new position: chief relationship officer. The fact that you've had chief revenue officers without this position is, frankly, disturbing. If you want major brands to commit to long-term relationships with you, you're going to need to commit to long-term relationships with them -- and help them create relationships with your users.

The role of the chief relationship officer should be to manage a series of relationships: between the website and the consumer, the website and the advertisers, and advertisers and consumers.

Historically, the relationship between website and consumer has been under the protection of your founder(s). But when your founder speaks of revolutionizing advertising at the expense of those consumers, the bond between your site and its users is weakened, and that's a difficult sell to advertisers.

Furthermore, the problems that you've had in attracting more "brand" (non-entertainment) advertisers are rooted in your product offering. The "products" you sell to advertisers are impression-based and promotion-centric and lock advertisers into campaigns that are too short-term to be part of an effective long-term social-media strategy.

If you really want to attract brands, change your approach by not even using the word "campaign" when speaking to them. The problem with "featured profiles," sweepstakes, gifts and applications is that they are effective only as long as they are promoted. What happens when the promotion ends? There should be no end to a social-media strategy. When campaigns constantly stop and start, advertisers are forced to constantly activate and reactivate consumers' engagement. It would be more efficient to maintain engagement through honest-to-goodness relationships.

There is a lot of money to be made from being a customer-relationship-manager for your advertisers. That represents a radical shift in thinking, pricing and inventory management, and it's a necessary evolution to undergo to avoid becoming just another ad solution that can be bought using an auction-based model.

Building relationships with consumers should be a fundamental part of every brand's strategy. As a social-networking website, you connect with people and you connect people to people. You can connect people with brands as well. But deep connections take time. A chief relationship officer must be responsible for making those connections a priority and for creating connection opportunities that can be monetized. And that means, as far as brands are concerned, throwing out the campaign-centric model in favor of one that is longer-term, more open-ended and provides greater opportunities to foster conversations, relationships, allegiances and ambassadorship.

With almost 25% of U.S. adults using social-networking websites (per a study from Ketchum and the University of Southern California Annenberg Strategic Public Relations Center) and more than 50% of U.S. teens having a profile on one or more social-networking websites (according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project), now is the time to figure out how to capitalize on these trends. Don't rely on media-buying agencies to figure this out for you.

Switching from an advertising-revenue model based upon impressions to one that builds lasting impressions starts with the installation of a chief relationship officer and the beginning of the end to the campaign as we know it.

So stand up for your consumers and advertisers. Change the way advertisers buy into social-networking websites and the way consumers buy into advertisers.
10 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: An Open Letter to CEOs of Social-Network Sites: Get a Relationship Point Person
  By jacob | Karkur April 13, 2008 09:24:55 am:
Ian,
This point of social-networking is so important!
Today there is a lack of experts in the range of promoting sites through social networks. That's why I see this knowledge being important and try to develop it.
  By rachelc | London April 14, 2008 02:02:18 pm:
ONe way to think about the role is as the representative of the user to the advertisers and the company. The people using social networks are not usually there to connect with advertisers but to connect with each other. Banner ads and too hard a promotion just get in the way of that. The Relationship Manager always needs to think of how the customer wants to use the system and just make it easier - using advertisers money if possible ;)
  By raysantopietro | Las Vegas, NV April 15, 2008 12:34:22 pm:
I am the Internet Department Head for a major advertising agency that specializes in gaming and casino marketing (an industry that has found great success with relationship marketing techniques,) and I have created a project outside of the agency to have more specialization within the 2.0 world, due to the fact that even the casinos do not fully grasp the mentality behind social network marketing. They still try very hard to apply traditional methodology and modified traditional measurement techniques in order to attempt to givee it a face they understand. Theproblemis that it is a medium that is different....you cannot be arrogent here. Consumers can so easily leave a site en massedue to offensive adverrtising being forced down their throat. This is not a medium that works like television, where I understand that the shows are paid for by me watching the commercials. Everything is confused by the notion that a social network belongs to the consumer....probably because it is made up of little piecs of the consumer. Basically they are right....they need the consumer more than the consumer needs them. Yet so few CEOs understand this fact, and continue to fail in their monitization efforts...or never start at all, relying on the VC money to float the network until someone figures it out. Think about the environment, get into the head of the user....and craft a strategy that is tolerable.
Raymond Santopietro
Focus Internet Services
www.focusnetservices.com
  By IAN | NEW YORK, NY April 15, 2008 12:44:15 pm:
Keep the comments coming, folks. These are all good points that just fuel the conversation. If change is going to happen (as it has already begun over at Fox Interactive Media with their recent organization) we need to speak up and demand what we believe is the right thing to do -- and not just in interactive marketing, either.
  By rdurst | Dunstable, MA April 15, 2008 02:16:22 pm:
Social networks and blogs naturally attract and foster "aficionados" who are of high interest to advertisers who wish to build brand recognition with these groups through image advertising. Conventional banner ads monetize through transactions, and their value is therefore all about exposure, traffic and conversion. Building and reinforcing a corporate brand that later translates into buying behavior is all about positive brand affect, and this is all about who shows up, what they are interested in and how well a brand is able to associate itself with the SN membership through effective messaging. It would seem that a chief responsibility of an SN "relationship" manager is then to clearly describe who is showing up and why so that they can pitch the value of the SN to potential brand sponsors, not just talk about traffic metrics and conversion rates.
  By lxlevins | Westmount, QC April 15, 2008 03:36:36 pm:
Funny, I was just talking about the importance of win-win from a hiring perspective earlier today, and it looks like the same principle applies here. Basically what marketers want is 1)a positive, competitive image for their brand, 2)that can command a 'fair' price, 3)for the majority of purchase occasions at retail. Advertising shapes opinions in a creative, soft sell way, keeping the consumer's needs in mind at all times. Why can't social networks provide that same impression with a 'social' soft sell approach?Make a new friend and share a (virtual) Coke with them. If someone accepts your invitation, send them a Bud Light (or a Corona if it's a really hot day!)
The average age on Facebook and MySpace skews younger, so let's have fun...while we make money!
- Loretta Levinson, Montreal, Canada
  By charleshendersonjr | DeSoto, TX April 15, 2008 11:08:38 pm:
Ian, I may be the oddball here. I am a recruiter. This is the same message I've communicated to my recruiting teams and colleagues. At the end of the day, the social networking sites are catalysts for building the right relationships at any point in time for your situation. Understanding that social networking sites are not static destinations but introductory conduits with varying lifecycles can be a tremendous foundation for realizing the true value of social networking. I view brands as the old notion of the dinner table when it comes to social networking. While it is not the focus, it is the gathering place where connections and memories are perpetually made and family members come and go, but the gathering will always be there.


Charles Henderson
charleshendersonjr@gmail.com

  By brandon | Accra April 16, 2008 06:41:21 pm:
the opportunities that the Social Network brings up for brand advertisers could seriously abound, considering the fact that the whole point for these brands is to 1)create a significant impression 2)make a strong connection, and 3)build a fruitful relationship with the consumer. the CRO's (pardon the acronym) role could thus be a pivot around which this brand-consumer relationshhip operates because they would understand the user segmentation within the network and use that to direct or even customize brand advertising for the most significant targets/demos... who might in effect turn out to be a more interested audience, more likely to pursue a call to action. could yield more dividends for all parties, couldn't it?
  By mchinkickapps | NEW YORK, NY April 17, 2008 02:41:35 pm:
Great points. I think this can be expanded beyond CEOs of social networks to CEO and leadership of any web publisher, media and entertainment company, and brand. Social networking is no longer a destination, it's a feature. Brands, advertisers and publishers need to realize the opportunity that this presents them in nurturing 'real' and 'lasting' customer relationships. Real = just like in human relationships, the best relationship typically involve a dialogue, not a monologue. Lasting = goes beyond a given campaign because the relationship is deep.
  By PIERRE | PARIS, 75 April 27, 2008 12:50:35 pm:
I have created and run the social network skyrock.com. Skyrock.com ranks 23th in the world in terms of page views (Comscore March 2008). We are profitable and expanding. Our way to monetize our audience is through "haute-couture" advertising. That means working with advertisers to create unique conversational marketing operations on our social network. It works for Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, Unilever, Nike, Puma, Adidas, Apple, Johnson & Johnson, Nokia, etc ... We are profitable because we believe in listening to our advertisers and building with them operations that enhance user experience. The integrated social webagency is the solution.



Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News