Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
'Hacking' Facebook Photos in the Name of Guerrilla Marketing
When 'Photos of Friends' Are Not What They Appear
| |
| Sam Lessin | |
I can't remember the first time it happened, but what prompted this post was the most recent time it happened -- my girlfriend's name was tagged on an Obama victory poster.
To be clear, the key here is that the people that the cause promoter has "tagged" in the image are not actually in the image and have not actively lent their support to the message. Rather, the individual supporting the given cause is hijacking a friend's name to broadcast a message to the friends of their friend. Follow?
| ABOUT THE AUTHOR | |
|
Sam Lessin is founder and CEO of Drop.io, a public/private file-sharing website. You can follow his exploits by subscribing to his own Drop.io feed. |
|
In Facebook, photos have several characteristics that make them especially fabulous marketing vehicles. First, people love them and tend to click on them all the time. Second, they get incredible real estate in news feed. Third, any message put into photos has a strange automatic relevance because it is attached to the name of a friend. Finally, there is a huge curiosity factor as to why a friend is tagged in an image. I am sure there are several other positives to this approach, but those are the ones that quickly come to mind.
The best thing one could do, which I have yet to see, would be to figure out some sort of marketing campaign that encourages people to take a branded message and tag their friends into it, thereby creating a viral campaign by tagging photos on Facebook.
Ultimately, photo tags are no different than any other sort of link. It is going to be interesting to watch people more deeply explore this concept, pushing things like Facebook photos far beyond its original intended purpose.
Of course, at the same time Facebook will likely look to deploy technology to try to control the channel. Part of the long-term challenge Facebook will likely face is finding a happy medium where people can derive economic value out of the platform (which Facebook can tax) while keeping the communication platform useful and streamlined. If Facebook succeeds the value is incredible, but if it fails the platform will become unusable.
For now, however, try it. Stop assuming that a photo of a friend need be a photo of that friend at all. Instead, consider a photo simply as a piece of content that you can pre-apply to people in your network to easily push a message to those within two degrees.
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!












"For now, however, try it." Trick my friends? No sir.
Trickery for an impression is a negative impression. That perspective is why Social Media is soaring, and the "traditional institutions" are taking hits in the seat of the pants everyday. This is clearly a clueless approach and I absolutely disagree with the nature of it. - Dave Barger dbarger@lunaweb.com
I congratulate you on a good blog post, however, as controversy does drive traffic.
The courts have gone over this many times, and the gist of it is, a person has a right to say how their likeness is used when it is used to advertise or promote something.
I can't believe that someone blogging on Advertising Age would recommend such a practice. It's not a good idea at all, however I would LOVE to see you put it into practice and accidentally use a photo of someone who lives in California, Nevada or New York, states which have extremely stiff penalties for such behaviors.
Also, doing what you suggest could also put you in violation of copyright laws many different ways. Again, you should know better.
I mean seriously, How stupid could you be to suggest this kind of behavior? Ad Age may want to reconsider allowing you to post on their site.