November 25, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


'Hacking' Facebook Photos in the Name of Guerrilla Marketing

When 'Photos of Friends' Are Not What They Appear

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Sam Lessin
Sam Lessin
I am seeing a new "hack" on Facebook photos cropping up more and more frequently -- and I think it will soon be repurposed as an interesting marketing tool. Namely, people have begun to upload a photo of something they wish to promote (perhaps a candidate or event) and then "tag" the photo with the names of as many influential friends as they can. The tagged photo then shows up in the news feeds of the friends of those influentials as if the photo was of them. After people click on it they find out that, in fact, it is a message in support of some cause.

I can't remember the first time it happened, but what prompted this post was the most recent time it happened -- my girlfriend's name was tagged on an Obama victory poster.

To be clear, the key here is that the people that the cause promoter has "tagged" in the image are not actually in the image and have not actively lent their support to the message. Rather, the individual supporting the given cause is hijacking a friend's name to broadcast a message to the friends of their friend. Follow?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sam Lessin is founder and CEO of Drop.io, a public/private file-sharing website. You can follow his exploits by subscribing to his own Drop.io feed.
This is a really terrific idea for someone looking to broadly push a message. If you tag 20 people into a given photo with something you are promoting you can easily reach thousands of people directly in their news feed with a big splashy image that appears highly relevant.

In Facebook, photos have several characteristics that make them especially fabulous marketing vehicles. First, people love them and tend to click on them all the time. Second, they get incredible real estate in news feed. Third, any message put into photos has a strange automatic relevance because it is attached to the name of a friend. Finally, there is a huge curiosity factor as to why a friend is tagged in an image. I am sure there are several other positives to this approach, but those are the ones that quickly come to mind.

The best thing one could do, which I have yet to see, would be to figure out some sort of marketing campaign that encourages people to take a branded message and tag their friends into it, thereby creating a viral campaign by tagging photos on Facebook.

Ultimately, photo tags are no different than any other sort of link. It is going to be interesting to watch people more deeply explore this concept, pushing things like Facebook photos far beyond its original intended purpose.

Of course, at the same time Facebook will likely look to deploy technology to try to control the channel. Part of the long-term challenge Facebook will likely face is finding a happy medium where people can derive economic value out of the platform (which Facebook can tax) while keeping the communication platform useful and streamlined. If Facebook succeeds the value is incredible, but if it fails the platform will become unusable.

For now, however, try it. Stop assuming that a photo of a friend need be a photo of that friend at all. Instead, consider a photo simply as a piece of content that you can pre-apply to people in your network to easily push a message to those within two degrees.
10 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: 'Hacking' Facebook Photos in the Name of Guerrilla Marketing
  By dbarger | Memphis, TN November 13, 2008 11:55:30 am:
First, I did scroll up to be sure I wasn't on the TheOnion since this is where this belongs. I was hoping that you'd get to the point of stating that this is a bad idea. Then I read:

"For now, however, try it." Trick my friends? No sir.

Trickery for an impression is a negative impression. That perspective is why Social Media is soaring, and the "traditional institutions" are taking hits in the seat of the pants everyday. This is clearly a clueless approach and I absolutely disagree with the nature of it. - Dave Barger dbarger@lunaweb.com
  By karrio | Toronto, ON November 13, 2008 12:19:42 pm:
I agree with Dave's comment above - I can't believe you're actually recommending this as a great, positive tool. Trickery for an impression is a negative impression, like Dave states, and even if this trickery "worked" for a moment, it turns against you very quickly.
  By BL | NEW YORK, NY November 13, 2008 12:29:47 pm:
EWWWWWWWW! "For now, however, try it" is, without a doubt, the worst advice I have seen this year. Ditto to what Karri and Dave said. Get a clue.
  By craigritchie | Toronto, ON November 13, 2008 12:31:14 pm:
This "interesting marketing tool" is wrong on many levels. From an advertising perspective, it's spam at best. From an IA/User experience perspective, it's misrepresenting the post-click offering. From a social media perspective, it attacks the trust that your "friends" have placed in the network or tool and the brand.

I congratulate you on a good blog post, however, as controversy does drive traffic.
  By drewbomhof | Vancouver, BC November 13, 2008 12:40:43 pm:
...but if your Brand is P&G's Tag Body Spray, you have an obvious connection to the act itself. The tagging of a friend's name, or additionally the decision by others to tag themselves as part of, say an image of a can of Tag Body Spray, is indicative of brand loyalty, and a cognitive acceptance that you enjoy the product. Not only would it allow P&G to develop a stronger relationship with customers, it would provide them a wealth of consumer-based information.
  By chaiguy | LOS ANGELES, CA November 14, 2008 06:37:44 pm:
The first time a "friend" attempts a stunt like this, they will be instantly "unfriended" with no appeals process.
  By lessin | New York, NY November 15, 2008 06:22:27 pm:
hi, some really interesting comments - got me thinking and I wrote a quick followup -- http://drop.io/swl
  By rtmd30 | scottsdale, AZ November 18, 2008 11:41:19 am:
This is a really bad idea. Advertising people should know that to use the image of a person in any way that promotes a product or service, they MUST have a signed model release in hand.

The courts have gone over this many times, and the gist of it is, a person has a right to say how their likeness is used when it is used to advertise or promote something.

I can't believe that someone blogging on Advertising Age would recommend such a practice. It's not a good idea at all, however I would LOVE to see you put it into practice and accidentally use a photo of someone who lives in California, Nevada or New York, states which have extremely stiff penalties for such behaviors.

Also, doing what you suggest could also put you in violation of copyright laws many different ways. Again, you should know better.
  By Gary | Pleasant Hill, CA November 21, 2008 03:28:24 pm:
Wow. Cool idea! So if someone wanted to teach sam lessin a lesson, they could tag some really raunchy photos of 21 year old girls in various states of undress and bondage with the name Sam Lessin, right???? And then when all your friends, family, peers, get feeds on your name... wow, really a great, great, great idea. (Is that enough sarcasm for you?)

I mean seriously, How stupid could you be to suggest this kind of behavior? Ad Age may want to reconsider allowing you to post on their site.
  By dwillsom | New York, NY November 26, 2008 11:53:36 am:
Agreed all around and I'm surprised there haven't been more comments against this. Seems like a quick way to invite anger and resentment against whatever you're trying to promote.



Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News