Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
Why the Four C's of Community Require the Commitment of Many
Let Content, Context, Connectivity and Continuity Guide Your Efforts
Have you ever given serious thought as to why marketers are so infatuated with the idea of "viral"? Think about it. Viral is actually pretty easy to wrap your head around. For starters, it's not difficult to measure. Views in YouTube, the number of times a video was embedded, the number of comments, the number of times a Facebook application has been downloaded or shared and the last time it was used. They are all measurable. And like traditional marketing, they're pretty easy to walk away from.
Pampers Village blends content, tools and social functionality based on the insight that parents want to connect and naturally form communities both online and off.
If you are fortunate enough to hit the "viral video" jackpot, for example, you can sit back and watch as the infectious behavior kicks in. No wonder marketers can't get away from the idea of viral. The problem with it, however, is that the odds are not in your favor. My writing may be influenced by the fact that I'm doing it on a plane on my way to Las Vegas for the WOMMA (Word of Mouth Marketing Association) summit. But, I'm also pretty sure that the stats back up my claim, as there are relatively few of the "Subservient Chicken" and Dove "Real Beauty" examples compared to the thousands of initiatives launched that hope to be the next one.
So let's forget the "V" word for a moment and talk about the "C" word: community. Chances are that this is a word that's come up nearly as often as "viral." But unlike viral, community requires a different set of objectives, strategy and tactics around measurement. Yet, intuitively, brands realize there is value to them. That's because if we take our bright and shiny marketing hats off for a moment, we realize that it's likely we are part of them. From Apple to Mini Cooper, many brands already have millions of fans participating in some form of community around the brand, official or unofficial. People who use social networks also feel like they're part of a larger community of people they relate to. Twitter, for example, has this effect, especially when many of us actually make efforts to meet each other in real life or just connect digitally. Just ask the "Motrin Moms."
But brands need to know a few things before they head down the community path. The web is saturated with communities. Some, like WebMD, are thriving, while others have come and gone. The starting point to any community is finding a niche that is currently underserved and serving that community better than anyone else. For example, I'm a member of the IXDA (Interaction Design Association), a community that sprung up because there was a void between information architects and designers. Brands do potentially have opportunities to act as what I'll call "facilitators," but they have to be willing to start with a bit if research and then ask themselves if they are really willing to do what it takes to start and maintain a community.
The tools aren't the issue -- by using services such as Ning, any brand can build a community without investing in heavy infrastructure. Or they can add community functions through solutions offered by companies such as Pluck. Communities can be used for consumer research, too. Leverage Software creates internal communities around products, brands and organizations which can be positioned to test ideas. Critical Mass, the company I work for, even has an internal group called "Curious" dedicated to polling communities that we help pull together for the purpose of gleaning insights.
And of course there's always the option to customize and build as we did on our recently on Pampers Village. For P&G we teamed up with both technical partners as well as global agencies such as Saatchi. Together we built the beginnings of a branded community that blends content, tools and social functionality, all based on the insight that parents want to connect and naturally form communities both online and off. But I'm getting ahead of myself. Before even thinking of a community initiative, consider the following "Four C's" as a high-level framework:
Content
Quality content is a great way to attract the people who are needed to form the elusive community that your brand is hoping to help build. When considering community initiatives, there are three questions to ask: Where will the content come from? Does it provide indisputable value? Can a regular flow of quality content be maintained? Even pre-Web 2.0 initiatives such as beinggirl.com, another P&G-powered community for female teens grappling with relevant topics, have to focus on keeping the content itself fresh and relevant.
Context
Context means understanding how to meet people where they are and serving them the right experience at the right time. Well-designed applications and functionality have great opportunities to deliver on context. For example, Facebook's recently updated iPhone app is perfectly designed for contextual usage on the go.
|
Suggested Links:
|
Connectivity
Communities thrive on squishy, hard-to-measure activities that are relationship-based at the root. It's not about mass communications but more about the micro-interactions which I've talked about at great length. Designing experiences that support thousands of micro-interactions means you are making a commitment vs. trying to produce a one-hit wonder. Communities can in theory be the new CRM (Customer Relationship Management), but require people to mind them. Community software platforms such as Liveworld offer moderation services. If you've invested in building a community framework, you need to play host if you're lucky enough for guests to arrive.
Continuity
Communities that thrive often evolve to meet the needs of users. As mentioned earlier, we launched our Pampers Village which includes a baby name finder, parent blogs, forums and a non-traditional navigation design that tags topics and references relevant products. Communities such as this and others need to be flexible to evolve while still providing a valuable and consistent user experience which can be sustained.
The bottom line is that building a community looks less like marketing and more like customer relationship management, and it takes the combined effort of different disciplines to even get one off the ground. It's not a campaign you can launch and walk away from. If you are fortunate enough to champion a brand that has the potential to draw people who want to connect, or are associated with an underserved niche -- then it's worth investigating. But know that you are in for the long haul and it won't be easy.
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!












http://admaven.blogspot.com
At Pluck, we see genuine participation (you mentioned as part of Connectivity) as extremely high leverage for customers. Getting a real representative of the company involved to "stir the pot" pays dividends on social media investments every time.
Another hidden C that you touch on is Commitment, which is best exhibited when social media initiatives are integrated with the whole marketing effort, holistically. Isolated social marketing can sometimes yield isolated results - there's certainly nothing wrong with starting small, but it's critical to think BIG about how social media can be woven into the broader marketing strategies.
We see these concepts working rather well for brands like Scotts, Kraft, Dallas Cowboys and Whole Foods, and fully expect continued innovation along these lines in 2009.
http://twitter.com/aweinroth
Check it out here: http://www.squidoo.com/youtube-super-star
Enjoy
Thanks !
--- Karl Lingenfelder
Allison, I could not agree more, this is a trait that communities do share with "viral" neither can be forced.
Adam, although you are a vendor in this space, it's good to know there are brands actively creating these spaces. Case studies like these will help provide more learnings along the way.
One more thing. Communities require human intervention. Just like the time I took to read all of the comments and address some of them. That speaks to commitment as brought up by Adam.
Julio Vasconcellos, http://experienceproject.com
Focus efforts on creating not to more of the same, but communities rich in the 4 C's discussed above (actually, I suppose there are 5 or 6 C's now). I'll add to that list: How about a C for credit? Give audiences credit where credit is due. They are smart enough to cut through the viral and see a community for its content value.
A good portion of this article resonated with my belief that as humans, we each have a desire to belong, to be included and considered. In my opinion, one factor in the success of such endeavors as you describe include constructing both the intrinsic inclusive (one of many like-minded individuals) appeal, and the exclusive draw ("A loving parent? Join us to learn...") that's often worked into the messaging.
Furthermore, maybe "Cultivate" could also join the tenets you suggest, or perhaps its implied. As you wrote, successful brands will be those in it for the long haul, through good and bad decisions. Working hard to sustain relationships once forged, maintaining community is a metaphor for being a good friend.
Thanks for the memorable read. Heather Rast
http://insightsandingenuity.com http://twitter.com/heatherrast
Couldn't agree more with your analysis. You mention that Community is closer to customer relationship management than it is to marketing. I feel Community is a new form of Marketing. Marketing is about understanding your customer needs and wants and addressing them with the right products and offers and building loyalty over time with that brand/product. Community offers marketers a real time window into customer needs and the ability to test concepts and ideas with immediate feedback. It also gives them direct access to their most passionate users and establishes a dialogue with them, which, if managed well and with authenticity, can yield amazing loyalty and value.
Amongst other sites, Demand Media manages LIVESTRONG.COM and eHow.com, both of which rely heavily on their community base. Within my team I have dedicated community managers on both sites, and see it as a major part of our marketing plan. It takes commitment and it's not a campaign based tactic, but the value of each community member is disproportionately high in comparison to a casual user of the site.
I think more and more marketers will be dedicating parts of their resources and budgets to building communities around their brands.
Very good, thoughtful column here, and thank you for mentioning LiveWorld (we do work for both the Pampers and MINI Cooper communities that you referenced).
I see Connectivity as the most important "C" in your list. What keeps community members coming back again and again? It's the personal connections they make and the real relationships they build within the community. Marketers (with the help of in-the-trenches community managers and social hosts) who can foster that ongoing sense of connection/purpose for and between members, will ultimately have the most vibrant communities of all.
Love this line from your piece: "It's not a campaign you can launch and walk away from." Well said. From our work on scores of communities over the years, we know that most take time to grow, mature, and thrive -- typically at least 3-6 months. This is a concept that isn't always music to a marketer's ears, specifically one who wants to execute a short *campaign* rather than build a long-lasting community.
Bryan Person | http://www.twitter.com/BryanPerson
LiveWorld