November 22, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Garfield's Ad Review

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Is This Dodge 'Fairy' Commercial Actually Hate Speech in Disguise?

Bod Garfield's Ad Review: Watch the Video

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Faggot. Queer. Fairy. These are synonyms, epithets one and all disparaging gays -- or, more often, heterosexual men deemed insufficiently masculine. Let's call that Fact No. 1.
The 'Fairy' spot was created for Dodge by BBDO, Detroit. ALSO: Comment on this review in the 'Your Opinion' section below.


Macho brand
Fact No. 2: Dodge is marketing its new Caliber subcompact as a tough little car, as opposed to sissy little Civics, Corollas and the like. This comports with Dodge's long-cultivated macho image, as exemplified by the grunting, Aerosmith heavy-metal music tag punctuating every spot.

Fact No. 3 is that one of the introductory commercials from BBDO, Detroit, features the juxtaposition of a burly tough guy and his Doberman with a sweater-draped girlie man who is walking four little lap dogs. Fact No. 4 is that the only line of dialogue in the commercial is the burly dude exclaiming, "Silly little fairy!"

And Fact No. 5 -- the genuinely astonishing fact -- is that Daimler Chrysler asserts that none of the above is meant to invoke a sexual insult.

"Was it intentional? Absolutely not," says spokeswoman Suraya Bliss, whose voice quavered as she spoke, perhaps because she was choking on the corporate line. "It's not the kind of company we are."

Preposterous corporate line
But, of course, the corporate line is preposterous. Much more likely is that someone at BBDO realized they could call people fairies if their commercial depicted an actual fairy. Get it! How subversive! A flitty little fairy! We can imagine the hilarity in the cubicle as they contrived a way to set up the "Not for sissies" selling proposition based on an innocent magical fantasy. The result-mean-spirited but undeniably crafty -- is as follows:

A winged little pixie, fluttering along an urban skyline, waves her magic wand and -- in a puff of magical dust -- turns a skyscraper into a gingerbread house. Next she turns a commuter train into a colorful toy choo-choo. Then she spies a new Dodge Caliber, which she waves at with her wand.

But nothing happens. Three times she tries her magic, to no avail. For all her efforts, the shiny black Caliber remains a tough, rugged subcompact. Meanwhile, her momentum sends her flying-splat! -- into a building.

'Silly little fairy'
A passing brute (he's also all in macho black as he walks his Doberman) is very amused by this scene. "Silly little fairy," he laughs.

So she wands him -- turning his Neanderthal getup into a wimpy tennis outfit, and his Doberman into four Pomeranians. "Oohhh!" he simpers.

Then the voice-over: "Introducing the all-new Dodge Caliber. It's anything but cute."

Oh, is it now?

Look, there's nothing wrong with positioning an economy car as a car with truck values. In fact, "the manly subcompact" is a very good idea. You can even suggest that everything else in the category looks effeminate. Though political correctness is out of control in this society, you're still allowed to choose your own sexual demeanor.

But what no advertiser has any business doing is calling people fairies, because it is cheap, because it is gratuitous, because it is hateful.

Gay and lesbian consumers
Also self-destructive, undermining Daimler Chrysler corporate entreaties to gay and lesbian consumers -- not to mention the much larger sick-of-sexual-bullying population. But never mind the business consequences.

There is simply no room in advertising for hate speech. Period.

For the record, Daimler Chrysler and BBDO protest that this spot is obviously not homophobic because the guy with the lap dogs is a preppy type-as opposed to some flamboyant queen. Of course, the same people swear they were totally unaware of the "fairy" double-entendre.

They say we're seeing things. We say they're living in a fantasy world, and it's anything but cute.

Review: Zero stars
Ad: Dodge
Agency: BBDO
Location: Detroit
101 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Is This Dodge 'Fairy' Commercial Actually Hate Speech in Disguise?
  By bv2295 | Warsaw, IN April 18, 2006 08:43:45 am:
This commecial does its job. It grabs your attention and focuses on the car. These groups need to get a life.
  By kATIE | Berlin, NH April 18, 2006 08:59:33 am:
I couldn't agree more with Bob Garfield. As someone who measures effectiveness of marketing programs for a living, I am somewhat horrified by the thought that somewhere a panel of people must have responded well to such a wretched ad. We can only hope that in the true measure of success -- visits to Dodge dealerships -- the results of such hate speech will be dismal.
  By Chris | Russellville, AR April 18, 2006 09:06:32 am:
Good job at making something out of nothing. This is just another fine example of today's society crying foul when there is none. We see it today in the average citizen who feels they are so much more important than anyone around them, to the journalist that feels it is their duty to spread their "opinion" to anyone who will listen, to the celebrity that feels their status entitles them to spew nonsense on world views to the government where our own congressmen(women) prove they aren't above the most petty of all fouls.

It seems to me that the phrase "I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally" is that which today's society tends to live by. What a sad commentary.
  By Robert | Windham, ME April 18, 2006 09:14:47 am:
We can find hidden messages in anything if we look hard enough. I see a fairy who wants everything to look "cutsie." But she can't make the car look that way. Macho man insults her. She makes him look "cutsie" for it. She can do that to HIM. Some folks need to stop trying to find messages that aren't necessarily there, and enjoy the creativity and humor of other people. Otherwise, that's hateful behavior.
  By rshanekennedy | Greenwich, CT April 18, 2006 09:23:40 am:
I think Bob's comments are absolutely ridiculous! He's trying to stir up trouble where is there is none. I found the commercial very funny and compelling - it clearly communicated the point in an entertaining way. Most importantly, the tough guy is turned into a preppy NOT a homosexual...I am friends with a lot of gays and not one I know dresses like that. And as a pseudo prep I was not offended, but laughed out loud. Bob is reading way too much into this...
  By RANDY | COTTONWOOD, AZ April 18, 2006 09:23:59 am:
The tough little compact car ad is anything but offensive to me... and I would guess the editorial comments were made by an extremely biased gay person. The comments made about the commercial are more offensive than anything in the commercial.
  By James R. | Frankfort, MI April 18, 2006 09:24:27 am:
As Groucho Marx once said, "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." Put another way, if the only tool in your toolbox is a hammer, everything else looks like a nail.

We've become a humorless society where it seems everyone is viewing life from a defensive posture. This leads to everything being an insult to someone, somehow, some way.

My wife and I have a broad spectrum of friends that include gays, lesbians, people of various ethnic origins, differing education levels, differing religions, and so on. When we first saw the ad we laughed out loud. It was funny! Not hateful, just funny. Of course, we have named several of our 125+lb dogs after Disney fairies (Tinkerbell and Merryweather), so maybe we're just odd. Possibly we just still have a sense of humor…
  By Sam | Cincinnati, OH April 18, 2006 09:29:52 am:
No - This time Bob Garfield is wrong. (And I nearly always agree with hiim) The Daimler Chrysler ad is not 'hate speech' at all. Dodge knows they can't sell 'tough little cars' that way.

The idea that 'Faries' are not masculine or feminine - in a healthy way - is downright ignorant. Just read the any of 'The Hobbit' books. Have global book and media publishers made a fortune on 'disguised hate speech' in 'Lord of the Rings' ? I don't think so.

The 'Fairies' are some of the most healthy - and 'tough' - and heroic - masculine - and feminine - people in world literature. Why not focus on that? And they interact with 'normal' humans very well, despite their 'differences.'

No - This car ad criticism is just 'hyper-political' spite. Bob is wrong this time. Or he just doesn't read widely enough..
  By Jason | Cincinnati, OH April 18, 2006 09:31:44 am:
Now I am one to find hidden insults in all kinds of commercials, but in this case I honestly believe "fairy" means "fairy". I saw the add before reading this review and saw nothing homosexual about it. Do you really believe this entire plot-line and the hours of special effects it requires were simply an excuse to use the phrase "silly little fairy"? That seems like a major case of paranoia.
  By Kamau | NY, NY April 18, 2006 09:37:11 am:
Bob-

I could see your point if the fairy wasn't actually a fairy.

In this case, though, I think the hypersensitivity has affected you.

The guy calls a fairy a fairy. And not a male in tights with wings, but a very obvious and attractive female.

So what is the social implication of a manly man, in this case, seeing a mythological, and anatomically correct fairy take a fall, and calling said fairy a 'silly little fairy' as manly men do at all ages?

To your point, does Izod's chief PR officer need to now come down hard on you about maliciously slandering tennis outfits as 'wimpy?'

Just say you don’t like the ad. Keep it short or move onto something else if there’s nothing to besides that. That’s why we read you.
  By Jack | Minot, ND April 18, 2006 09:41:24 am:
What really amazes me is that the overpaid idiots of these companies actually thought this was a good idea??? Wow, if they'd hire me and fire the jerks who allowed this to happen I could save them a ton of cash....what a bunch of idiots....
  By Josh | Malden, MA April 18, 2006 09:48:54 am:
Is Bobby G. running for office? What a ridiculous commentary on one of the better account planning insights current running. It's Bob not Dodge making the point that there is something wrong with fairies and male dog walkers in sweaters. BBDO is accurately segmenting their customer. Shame on you Bob, but I hear the AFA is hiring minds like yours.
  By Adam | Toronto, ON April 18, 2006 09:49:51 am:
Offensive, yes. Too late for fixing, no.
As a devil's advocate, you could say the commercial depicts the ultimate nightmare of a homophobic person. The homophobe turns into a homosexual.
If Dodge were interested in showing tolerance (or doing some damage control) in any way, they would follow up with a commercial that shows the "fairy" driving away in the "masculine" car.
  By Greenlight | Brooklyn, NY April 18, 2006 09:53:48 am:
I found the "fairy" comment uncomfortable and in poor taste on the first (of many) viewings of this commercial, but not for the exact same reasons.

I'm willing (barely) to believe that the use of the word "fairy" is intended simply to describe an actual winged, magical fairy, as depicted in the commercial (although how supposedly hip ad creatives with their finger on the pulse of pop culture might have missed the possible double-meaning, as the agency claims, is beyond me).

The problem lies with the delivery of the line "Silly little fairy." The delivery, with the clipped emphasis on "fairy" that honestly sounds like an insult, coming from the mouth of what is apparently supposed to be an uber-macho don't-screw-with-me working-class type of guy, floors me. Did they consider the context at all? (On the other side of the coin, this commercial could also be considered (albeit possibly unintentionally) in its resulting [unintentional] implication that all blue-collar, doberman-walking meathead-types are judgmental homophobes.)

Do these companies actually _watch_ these ads before approving them?
  By tommyzman | Oak Ridge, NJ April 18, 2006 09:54:04 am:
For years I've read Garfield's comments and made either of the the following statements: "Great point Bob." or "You are such a whining ass...just shut up." Well for the review of the Dodge truck commercial, this time I'm leaning towards the latter.

You mention epithets that are disparaging to gays -- yeah, tell it to the television producers of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy or Queer as Folk. Oh, but it's OK if "they" say it. Just like when rappers use the "N" word throughout their song lyrics. Like HELL it's OK. Classic double standard, BS. Let's call THAT fact number 1.

Garfield is so over the top, out of control with his assessment of the "meaning" behind the ad. First off, if the fairy was either a guy or a woman with a short cropped hair style I might see the point. But it's a take off on Tinkerbell for God's sake. The passing brute he refers to, calls her a silly little fairy because of one reason only....SHE IS A FAIRY!!!! Should they change the commercial and borrow a line from the famous Seinfeld episodeâ€" after he calls her a silly little fairly, he follows with "Not that there's anything wrong with that."

She turns him into a tennis playing preppie boy, not some lather clad deviant. All she did was change him into the very opposite of his persona.

And Chysler spokeswoman Suraya Bliss, whose voice quavered as she spoke â€" well perhaps that was for one reason only: because she had no clue what in this world Garfield was referring to.

Bob Garfield is reaching above and beyond for a story here. To accuse this ad of being "Hate Speech In Disguise" is a gross, blatant and vile example of the political correctness that's hammering our society and lining the pockets of litigation attorneys everywhere. If you think for one second that a corporate giant like Chrysler would intentionally make this kind of fauxpas in this day and age, you are sadly mistaken.

Bottom Line: I NEVER saw a gay bashing or hateful connotation in the ad. Does that make me a homophobe or gay hater? God, I hope not.

Does this make Bob Garfield an over the top, politically correct liberal looking to sell papers? Well if it walks like a duck...

Oh dear God...Did I accidently just make a gay reference?

Tom Zarzecki
Tom Zarzecki Jr & Associates
Oak Ridge, New Jersey
  By DOUGLAS | KATY, TX April 18, 2006 10:02:11 am:
You're over the top on this one. It's funny. Would you have preferred "Bedwetter."?
"Wuss."? Both of which, modified by "worried, handwringing, politically correct" seem to apply to you too. Why don't you go get a job decorating windows or something.
  By TOUCH72 | springfield, VA April 18, 2006 10:04:46 am:
Stop sounding like a fairy. No one cares, your the one with a problem. learn to take a joke, there is no "freedom from being offended or right" in the constitution or the bill of rights. you cry baby
  By Bob | Asheville, NC, NC April 18, 2006 10:05:20 am:
I think you're reading too much into this ad. I look at it as a fun and clever way of illustrating that the car is not cute, thus setting it apart from the competition.
  By machelle | Auburn Hills, MI April 18, 2006 10:11:03 am:
I don't think it is fair to project your values and sensitivity onto someone else's creative work. I have seen that commercial a dozen times and until I read your article it never even entered my mind that it was hate speech. I didn't see the facts as being as obvious as you did. Perhaps your hypersensitive on the subject?
  By Jon M | #1, MN April 18, 2006 10:12:02 am:
As an artist and college art instructor I can say that when you hear a lot of critques you learn that how a work is interpeted says as much about the viewer as the object. In my opinion this interpretation is a stretch.
  By Devin | Springfield, OH April 18, 2006 10:12:40 am:
No. So the fairy, a very traditional tinkerbell-type fairy, turns tough guy into cutesy guy. That's consistent and funny. I would like Mr. Garfield to explain exactly what he means by a "sweater-draped girlie man." I find the writers choice of words throughout the article more inflammatory than anything remotely connected to the spot.
  By JAMES | CINCINNATI, OH April 18, 2006 10:13:32 am:
OHH PUHLEEZE!!! GET OFF THE BLEEDING HEART, PC BANDWAGON!

Going straight to the "hate speech" moniker is unneccessarily inflammatory and precludes any constructive debate on the topic.

To begin with, the fairy is OBVIOUSLY female. Secondly, what she does is OBVIOUSLY fantastical in nature. What is the "passing brute" supposed to say? "Now, now, there, confused, vertically challenged, mythological, winged denizen of the forest?" The protagonist is a FAIRY, not a symbol of sexual proclivity. Good gracious, man, get your head out of the latest Al Franken / Hillary Clinton conspiracy theory textbook!

Also, remember one very important fact; we live in a pluralistic society with a diversity of opinion. In case you have not read it in a while, the First Amendment does NOT guarantee you the right to not be offended. It does, however, give citizens the right to communicate in any form or fashion they see fit. That includes the presentation of promotional ideas that some may consider to be on the edge. If you really want to protest something, protest the blatant use of sex in advertising.

Look back in history. If you seek to stifle or silence opinions and observations you disagree with, eventually it will be yours they seek to silence. However, no one will be around to protest for you.
  By Michael | Norcross, GA April 18, 2006 10:24:56 am:
It would seem it is use with a hate problem seeing windmills on every corner? I work in S.F. in advertising, in a mostly gay office. We were talking about why we did not like this ad (with reasons completely deferent from yours) and we discussed the fairy thing at length. None of the gay men had a problem with the fairy, and all perceived the tough street guy being magically changed to a suburban prepster as funny. No gay connection was made; in fact, most felt the tough guy looked gayer than the preppy one. Moreover, no one took offense at the fairy or made a connection to homophobic issues with it. Perhaps you are a little too tuned in to hate, looking for it everywhere or perhaps your not mature enough yet to realize the world if filled with multiple meanings. Most average people will associate the fairy with cute, mischievous, and magical, not gay. Perhaps you need to stop looking for enemies around every corner and stop being a victim of your own imaginations. Articles like this stir discontent and mistrust, not encourage equality and recognize that all is not evil in the world.
  By Peter | Troy, MI April 18, 2006 10:30:16 am:
I didn't know Bob was gay. Wow.
  By Robert | Berkey, OH April 18, 2006 10:31:49 am:
Absolutely not. Very clever commercial with a very effective message. Nothing more, nothing less. I just don't see the "hate speech". Let's not exaggerate or blow things out of proportion.
  By Peter | Troy, MI April 18, 2006 10:35:23 am:
Fact No.1, There is a real female fairy in this spot. How is it insulting to gays to call an actual fairy a "silly little fairy?"

Fact No.2, The only person who insults the female fairy is punished for it.

Fact No.3, Drawing the conclusion that a man who looks overly cute and dresses effeminate is gay - is insulting to gays.
  By LOUIS | Rego Park, NY April 18, 2006 10:38:14 am:
I think people need to get over themselves. As long as there wasn't a "Fairy" getting kicked to the curb and heavily beaten, enough. You want to be out and open and strong and vibrant, then deal with the comments and the fun poking. On the other side of the extreme "Lady's Men" get the same type of stereotype-ism that plays off their exact common behavior - do they have protests and demand they be treated fairly for being womanizers? You are who you are and the world is what it is - DEAL WITH IT. Look at Ford, they get criticized for running in gay books and then for not running in gay books??? The Commercial gets the point across that it is a "Macho Man's" Car - Queer Eye for The Straight Guy anyone?
  By Ryan | Austin, TX April 18, 2006 10:49:28 am:
As a gay man who has seen this ad numerous times on t.v., I can honestly say that - and maybe I'm just not sensitive about these things - I don't find this ad in any way demeaning.
Is it a good ad? Probably not.
Is it hate speech? Probably not.
One thing much of America tends to forget is that you don't make a person gay by taking away their masculinity. To even compare this ad to hate speech is reading into this far more than anyone ever intended.
  By Michael | Chicago, IL April 18, 2006 10:50:42 am:
I think that you are missing a very obvious point, the stupid thing is a fairy. You missed something important, the fairy was strong enough and powerful enough to change all of those things into something sweet except the car and that is the point. The car is tough.
  By Bob | Savannah, GA April 18, 2006 11:02:32 am:
I couldn't disagree more with Mr. Garfields' assessment. This advertising is breakthrough. I'm tired of five burly construction guys walking around kicking the tires in the utility category. Boring! And as for homophobia--c'mon! The fairy is a real girl who easily puts the macho Dobie owner in his place when he shows his bigotry. Kudos BBDO!
  By Gary | Orem, UT April 18, 2006 11:19:08 am:
Oh...come on Bob...I don't think Dodge had any intention of offending those with alternative lifestyles...but isn't that the point? It's always those with an alternative point of view that want the entire world to except their agenda (just look at the French). I'm tired of people telling me I CAN'T believe in God because they CHOOSE not to, I'm tired of people telling me I HAVE TO redefine the definition of a family (of husband and wife) because they have a different OPINION, I'm tired of the fact that I can't get a job simply because I'm white (and a corporation CAN’T hire me because I don't meet the quota). Maybe...just maybe...Dodge had no intention of offending some whino gay right activist group...but no...I'm just a bigot and so is Dodge.
  By LeeDon | Dallas, TX April 18, 2006 11:45:39 am:
Amen, brother!
  By Chuck | Round Rock, TX April 18, 2006 11:46:13 am:
Great ad, you really have to reach to find "hate speech" in that. But then again, how else do you keep the focus on the homosexual community if you're not seeing boogey men around every corner and moaning about the "plight of the gay man"? On the other hand the reporting itself smacks of a gay biased agenda instead of objectivity, which unfortunately is all to common place in media these days. Why simply critique or report when you can push an agenda of some sort, even if it's at the expense of someone else? Whatever happened to journalistic integrity and why doesn't someone do a story on the unfortunate demise of that?
  By PETER | SANTA MONICA, CA April 18, 2006 11:50:13 am:
Mr Garfield's interpretation is so delusionally paranoid that it defies comprehension. The traditional literary characteristics of fairies are mischievous and often cruel (as a cursory reading of Spenser's The Faerie Queen or Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream will reveal), but Garfield ascribes a modern and perjorative meaning that was completely missing in the way I viewed the spot. If there's anything that deserves criticism, it's the casting of the fellow whom Garfield describes as macho. Even before his outfit is transformed, the guy and the way he delivers his line are about as macho as Isaac Mizrahi.
  By snowack | PORTLAND, OR April 18, 2006 11:50:57 am:
Is This Dodge 'Fairy' Commercial Actually Hate Speech in Disguise?
No. I could leave the answer at just no but that really does no justice to the full page of opinions by Mr. Garfield. Mr. Garfield, are you insulted in Cinderella when her fairy godmother makes her a new dress, because stereotypically homosexual men are snappy dressers? Are you insulted in Peter Pan when Tinkerbell spreads her pixie dust and everyone thinks happy thoughts so they can fly because it must be a reference to drug use among homosexuals? There are many words and associations in our current society that can be insulting if you choose to view them that way, but sometimes a fairy is just a fairy. Mr. Garfield posits that “the corporate line is preposterous” when Dodge states that the ad was in no way meant to be insulting. Mr. Garfield, really? You find it easier to believe that Dodge would risk alienating a potential customer base rather than believing that someone viewing the ad would take it at face value? As a fairy making things cute and being thwarted by the obviously not cute Dodge? I have to say before reading your column I did just that. And having spoken with others about the ad, they also did just that. Preposterous…no, I don’t think so.
  By Hank | Las Vegas, NV April 18, 2006 12:06:01 pm:
I'm gay and it never occurred to me that the spot might be hate speech. Could it be? Well, sure, but I'm not offended by it. I think people are being overly PC. Even if it IS hate speech, I was never and never will be a Chrysler customer. Their product is crap.
  By Linda | Narberth, PA April 18, 2006 12:07:40 pm:
I was shocked by this "stupid little fairy" commercial the first time I saw it and I'm amazed that it's still on the air. Not only is it mean and homophobic (I don't care what the manufacturer says), it's hardly a move that an industry in a severe economic slump should undertake if it wants to maintain what customer base it still has.
  By robert | Lexington, KY April 18, 2006 12:08:23 pm:
I am an openly gay man and an advertising professoinal. If anything, I can see how this commercial would appeal to the LGBT community. I loved it and thought it to be funny. There will always be some in our world who will find any reason to be offended. This is a good commercial and simply trys to communicate that the car is powerful. Gay men want the same thing that straight men want - a lil power behind the gear shift.
  By Ezra | Walnut, CA April 18, 2006 12:09:22 pm:
You have lost your mind. Using popular mythology to illustrate an idea that is neither subversive or hateful is not evidence of anti gay or lesbian ideology.

And to further this breakdown in logic you use circumstantial evidence to promote that there is hate speech (" the way her voice creaked" ).. had they made the fairy a man then you could argue this, but this little winged creatures have always lived in cute little villages and twinkled along with magic wands.. a polar opposite concept to Dodges brutish brand image. I thought it was funny and made the point well.
  By Jonathan | Irvine, CA April 18, 2006 12:15:37 pm:
Please...I believe in reading between the lines, but to extrapolate "hate speech" from this Dodge ad is trying to make something of nothing.
  By Laura | New York, NY April 18, 2006 12:49:58 pm:
I think we need to laugh more. Everything is taken so seriously... everyone is afriad of saying anything, because I tell you what, somebody somewhere WILL get offended. Even if no offence was intended. Somebody will read something into anything.
  By Howard | Swampscott, MA April 18, 2006 01:02:36 pm:
Let me premise this by saying that I am a liberal, who is all for gay rights. However, It is clear that Bob Garfield was suffering from a bad case of writer's block, up against deadline and had nothing intelligent about which to write. That, or he has some grudge against Dodge or BBDO. There is absolutely nothing immoral or wrong about this commercial. There is no mention or inference of sexuality of any kind. Simply put, the man at the end called a fairy a fairy. This ad is a creative, original and effective method in which to portray the image of the car. Mr. Garfield, I challenge you to think of another name for the magic, mythical, flying thing. Learn to choose your battles - attempting to smear the reputation and judgment of any company for no reason whatsoever is both unethical and unprofessional itself. I suggest you think before writing in the future.
  By Jason | Peoria, IL April 18, 2006 01:05:07 pm:
You're being ridiculously over-sensative. Why not shout racism while you're at it? After all, the big "dark" dog was changed into a cute "white" poodle. Therefore, dark skinned creatures are ugly white white ones are "cute."

You're ouchy stance will make only succeed in making mythical faries as unusable to us as the english words gay, queer and dyke.

I've seen this spot at least twenty times and never once considered a sexual overtone. In fact, I thought it wasn't bad. I actually laughed when I saw the little thing smack into the wall (then again, I liked Dumb & Dumber).

Like a Rorschach Test -- we all see what we want to see, whether the message was intended or not.

Lighten up.
  By tom | Herndon, VA April 18, 2006 01:07:44 pm:
Little far fetched on the hate speech. The fairy is simply turning everything into it's fairytale equivalent or opposite. They use the same whimpy dog take on the other spot for the Caliber...the one with the dogs ass hanging out the window.

Both are stupid and don't show the car enough to even make sense. BBDO is really driving some stupid ideas to the people who are desperate enough to try it.
  By skyworld | Stoneham, MA April 18, 2006 01:26:43 pm:
What is Bob's problem? Next he'll tell us the opening sequence in Walt Disney is hate speech. Get real! It's just Tinkerbell in a very clever, upbeat and creative ad. Don't waste our time!
  By Cathy | Erlanger, KY April 18, 2006 01:33:59 pm:
No. Give me a break.
I think Dodge is tryng to appeal to "rugged" and "rougher" men or personalities. I think that both male and females alike can be this target audience - if they are into outdoor-type activities etc...

I do not think their commercial contained hate speech at all. I think those that think it is are way too sensitive on this subject and are apparently not the target audience.
  By Eric | Woodland Hills, CA April 18, 2006 01:47:36 pm:
Please.... Give me a break!
It's a great spot.
I think you are reding way too much into it.
My take on thespot is that the fairy is trying to improve things. But... She can't improve the car.
As for the guy and the dog... It would be no different than if she were to trn him into a frog... What then? Dodge it anti-frog?
And even if she was trying to "gay" him up... So what?
I think it only offends those that are confused with thier own identity.
  By Richard | New York, NY April 18, 2006 02:13:18 pm:
Yes. It is. There are plenty of commercials that convey a masculine, tough sensibility without resorting to 'silly little fairies' as a foil. A cheap ploy by lazy fratboy creatives.
  By Montana | San Francisco, CA April 18, 2006 02:13:30 pm:
I think the article is taking things too far. I don't think the commercial is that deep. There was a cute fairy wanting to turn the world into cute things, except it couldn't turn the car into one. The tough guys snickered at the fairy when she got pushed into the wall and she turned him into something cute. Didn't ring of any kind of gay/hate undertone whatsoever to me. Seems more that the author of the article is looking for self-glorification in the attempt to be provocative. Leave that to Nietzsche, babe, you fall tremendously short from the noteworthy.
  By Juan | Austin, TX April 18, 2006 02:28:06 pm:
I don't believe the ad is "hate speech". Its cute, however Dodge trying to make the "subcompact" car...tough is the true crime. The car is neither tough nor reliable. Its a piece of junk.

But thanks for standing up for the group that always gets teased and bullied by macho america!
  By Nokturne | Fort Collins, CO April 18, 2006 02:51:18 pm:
I must say, I found the ad to be somewhat creative. But the subtle jab at "the sissy" is totally there. The fairy was flitting about the city turning buildings and locomotives into things of fantasy. I really don't understand why the thug wasn't turned into a "toy" as well. Say for instance a teddy bear or something playful. Nope. He was turned into a stereotypical mincing little queen complete with shoulder sweater and a lisping guffaw. It is in that moment the commercial becomes suspect. The word "fairy" is muttered and -- like magic -- appears a flaming dogwalker in a bad wig. You can't tell me this was just an unfortunate coincidence. These people get paid big bucks to mill over these commercials -- this was on purpose.

As a supporter of the GLBT community -- I am not completely offended. However I can see why a person might be put off by the stealthy "laugh at the girly-man" moment in this commercial.

Oh -- and enough with the "agenda" talk. The idea that gays are imposing on some of your sensitive "Christian ideals" (because they don't want to be casually mocked on television) is absurd. There's enough room at the dinner table for everyone. Even winged sprites.
  By Corey | Lakeood, CO April 18, 2006 02:54:52 pm:
I myself am a gay male, so let my words carry a certain amount of weight, considering I'm a member of the group of people purportedly at the butt of this ad's joke and/or 'hate speech.'

I first saw this advertisement about a week ago and I enjoyed it. Not once did I get the feeling that the ad was in the least bit subversive or hateful toward homosexuals. In fact, I didn't see a single reference to sexuality in it at all! What I saw was a car company championing its dark, sleek, unaffected, smooth-riding car by contrasting it with cutesy, sugary, glittery, pastel-y world of fairy tales. That’s it, nothing more. It’s quite a stretch to say that just because a literal fairy appears as the de facto villain in the commercial, Dodge is calling anyone a fairy, let alone equating that with homosexuality. That’s like saying because the fairy reduces a skyscraper into a gingerbread house, the commercial is calling out terrorism. Whatever.

I’m as sensitive to condescension and ridicule as they come, so if there were ‘hate speech’ elements to this ad, I’d know it. Choo-choo trains and gingerbread houses don’t speak of any sexuality to me, nor do bright colors, sweaters around necks, or yippy dogs. If critic Bob Garfield sees something sexual â€" or homosexual â€" about those things, then he’s either got an overactive libido or he’s bought into the whole crazy idea that a person’s sexual identity prescribes exactly what he/she is allowed to wear, do, and enjoy in life; if anything is offensive or insulting and makes me feel pastel blue, it’s this.

I’m really hoping Bob Garfield isn’t homosexual. If he is, forget the pastels altogether and color me embarrassed; we’re not all 'homochondriacs.'
  By Sean | San Francisco, CA April 18, 2006 03:07:35 pm:
I think you're going WAY too deep on this one. It's a cute gag, not a grand BBDO-Dodge conspiracy to attack gays.

--Sean
  By Chris | Portland, OR April 18, 2006 04:10:33 pm:
No way. Not hate speech. Garfield is way off on this one.
  By JASON | MINNEAPOLIS, MN April 18, 2006 04:22:42 pm:
I don't know about the hate speech, but wanted to make a possible correction to the article...I believe the "heavy metal" music tag in their TV commercials is Led Zeppelin's "Oh yeah," and not Aerosmith. However, I could be wrong...
  By JASON | MINNEAPOLIS, MN April 18, 2006 04:35:02 pm:
I was wrong on my last posting...Led Zeppelin doesn't have a song titled "Oh yeah," but I still think the Dodge tag in their ads is Led Zeppelin...
  By Sean | Kapolei, HI April 18, 2006 04:41:27 pm:
Give me a big stinkin' break! He called a fairy a fairy. It's not like she turned him into a flamboyant gay man and then said to him, "Now who's the silly little fairy?" Although, personally, I'd still think that would be funny. But then again I find it easier to see the humor than reach unecessarily to try and find hate. Because I'll tell you what, gay men can be funny. So can straight men. So can anybody! When an ad makes fun of a straight man with no fashion sense, is that hate mongering against straights? Let's lighten up Bob!
  By pfeehery | Denver, CO April 18, 2006 05:36:50 pm:
I can't believe I even took the time to read this article. Just when I thought political correctness couldn't get any worse, I read this garbage. You're the reason why life is getting more and more monotonous. Let me ask you a question, do you hate blue collar men? I think you do.
  By alex | denver, CO April 18, 2006 06:02:13 pm:
Right on Mr. Garfield. And while we're on the subject, could you please do a piece exposing Captain Hook for the hate-monger he truly is? The Captain's unmitigated attacks on Peter Pan and his effervescent companion Tinkerbell represent a very dark chapter in our history. No one should be allowed to infringe on an individual's right to wear green tights and frolic with fairies (oops, sorry Mr. Garfield - I meant very happy people who shower glitter everywhere with their magic wands) . The story of this villainous villain and his dastardly deeds desperately needs to be told. Down with the Captain!
  By JEFFREY | NEW YORK, NY April 18, 2006 06:29:27 pm:
I appreciate the sensitivity to the issue, but as a gay man in the business, I don't see any level of homophobic undertones in the ad at all. Now, if there were any stereotypes of swishy walks or limp wrists once the guy is transformed, than I'd be emailing HRC, BBDO and Dodge.

Think it's a cute ad.

Jeff New York City
  By MICHAEL | BROOKLYN, NY April 18, 2006 06:45:34 pm:
Garfield you are the one who has gone over the top here. This is not a bad spot. I do not feel there is any "hate" or disrespect to any group implied by the creators of this TVC.

Others have expressed this already more eloquently than I can above.

Get some rest and look at it again in the morning.
  By judkinsr | Columbus, OH April 18, 2006 07:36:19 pm:
You're being overly sensitive and supplying a derogatory tertiary meaning to "fairy" that isn't present in the commercial any more than it's present in "Lord of the Rings." The opposition in the review is between the the car and the fairy, and the fairy here attempts to "feminize" the car by making it magical. That assumes that magical things are feminine, for one. Dodge might be implying that, of course, because they're making their car out to be masculine, so whatever it's opposed to takes the position of the feminine. So, with the car and the fairy, if we want to follow the line of gender reasoning, you have a masculine force that's impervious to being feminized. The man in the commercial later, however, while masculine, is not at all impervious to the fairy's magic. That means that the car is actually too masculine to have anything feminine about it and it stands as a symbol for unadulterated masculinity. Compared to the guy at the end, the commercial seems to be arguing with that juxtaposition that no matter who you are or how masculine, you can be enchanted/feminized, but the car can't be. The fairy, thus,stands for the ambiguity of sexuality in individuals but the commercial only points this amiguity out and opposes it to the adamantly masculine car. So,there's no slur intended in the relationships in the commercial. Rather, the car is simply a masculine symbol in a sexually ambiguous world. ~Ryan Judkins (saberknight AT gmail.com)
  By GARY | Cleveland, OH April 18, 2006 07:48:56 pm:
Sure, Bob, and all fairy tales should be immediately removed from bookshelves and libraries everywhere, because they too must be hateful and deceitful "faggot tales" in disguise. I'm going to burn my copy of Peter Pan right now, and in the middle of the street to make a more poignant statement.

By extending your reasoning, we all should rally against using any color of the rainbow in any negative or comparison advertising, lest it be interpreted by paranoids like yourself as a desecration of the gay flag.

Your comments would hold a drop of water if the fairy in the ad were a man, or better yet, a "girly man." But the fairy is very obviously a woman, and very beautiful to boot.

The English language and the way it's used suffers from people like you. Maybe you're the one who's misusing and misunderstanding the language, and misleading us with your words.

Your analysis is moronic.
  By eric | ny, NY April 18, 2006 09:03:37 pm:
moronic analysis.
  By ehernandezjr | SAN ANTONIO, TX April 19, 2006 08:08:51 am:
You are so far off on this one it's not even funny. I found the spot to be humorous and never even thought it was a negative commentary toward homosexuals. Get real. Eleazar - San Antonio
  By n8thnl | Chicago, IL April 19, 2006 09:35:42 am:
I can certainly read the negative undertones and as a result will not be spending my money on any Chrysler vehicles. Isn't that advertising 101... DON'T offend potential customers.
  By josh | Middleburg Heig, OH April 19, 2006 09:36:44 am:
Glad to see all the comments slamming Bob. I usually enjoy reading your reviews, but as has been said 60+ times now, you were off on this one. I personally loved the ad, I still think Dodge builds crappy cars, but I loved the ad. The commercial made it's point and was so far from "hate". Ok, so it may have been offensive to ficticious fairies and overly feminine men. I'm not gay, but have a lot of gay friends, and you wouldn't know they were gay by meeting them. I have yet to meet a gay man that looks or acts like the character in the commercial. I have a feeling even homosexuals were laughing at this one.
  By Joseph | New York, NY April 19, 2006 01:47:28 pm:
So we have 2 people who feel the same as Bob Garfield and then about 35-50 people who have decided to write in against his point. The majority of them tearing into his arguements and not his character.

I know most people will voice their opinion to disagree but I think it's obvious to almost everyone that this article was tripe. I agree he must have been under a deadline crisis and thus worked some magic similar to the fairy, to find some contraversy in nothing. - NYC
  By golyadkin1 | Phoenix, AZ April 19, 2006 02:12:10 pm:
The review is way off base, there's nothing hateful about it.
  By Daniel | Baldwinsville, NY April 19, 2006 06:12:47 pm:
Ready to unleash an onslaught of insults and discouraging remarks about this article I found my fellow readers have taken the opportunity quite successfully and clearly more eloquently than petty phrases like "Hack Writer," "Foolish insecure man" or "Reaching thoughts of a confused male." And no Bob, by “confused” I’m not questioning your sexuality, just your intelligence. But hey, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, we all have bad days. Just don’t let it happen again.

Fact No 1: The fairy is a female
Fact No 2: The fairy is a fairy
Fact No 3: N. A tiny imaginary being in human form, depicted as clever, mischievous, and possessing magical powers. (dictionary.com)

Fact No 4:
Come on Bob, do we really feel that the creative brief on the desks at BBDO Motor City asked for a clever way to gratuitously insult the effeminate and homosexual? The reality of this commercial is that this article has given it more attention and exposure than it deserves. It’s a weak idea, it’s so far out of left field it was playing a completely different sport. It doesn’t resonate with anyone let alone have the impact to offend. Besides that the car itself is indistinguishable from every other Dodge put out in 2006. This “silly little fairy’s” real intention in her games and mayhem should have been to create a marketable vehicle, instead she overshadows what is really important and creates a frenzy over fictional bias. And to say hate speech? The character that makes the statement, isn’t even a representation of anything desireable or positive. No one bigotous or otherwise leaning in their lazy-boy recliner spills juju bees as they gasp outloud to the television…”take that you fairy b*tch!” when your “neanderthal”- (also a slang and potentially offensive statement to those of slow and boorish wit) remarks that this particular fairy happens to be silly. She’s “silly” for showing up for the commercial at all. And the “tennis outfit” that you’ve proclaimed, which arguably is the only sensible point that could even be extrapolated, is more associated with new money preppy collegiate drinkers with trust funds and an overarching sense of being cultured. Ask Queer Eye alums if they’ll even be caught dead in such an outfit. It’s not a statement of or about homosexuality. But gay or straight. No one should buy this car.

Fact No. 5:
I’ll tell you though Bob, you weren’t COMPLETELY off base. They ARE Pomeranians.

Dan Frigolette-Brooklyn NY
  By HARRY | SAN ANTONIO, TX April 20, 2006 12:14:15 am:
Bob Garfield has completely lost his mind and he owes Chrysler and DDBO an apology.

Fact 1: The brute calls the silly little fairy a "silly little fairy" because, alas, she is a silly little fairy.

Fact 2: The brute is subsequently and comically punished for his rudeness by being transformed into a club-going prepster, not a gay.

Fact 3: Homosexuality doesn't come anywhere near this piece of creative.

For ad agency artists who created a delightful and light ad to have their work called "hate speech" is beyond reproach. I think Garfield should lose his job over this preposterous accusation unless he apologizes to the ads creators.
  By STEVE | CINCINNATI, OH April 20, 2006 01:32:25 am:
Well 1st off, the last time I checked the Constitution, we had free speech here in America. Secondly, why is everyone so thin-skinned these days. Yeesh. And thirdly, why is always about them? The world doesn't revolve around gays or other groups that are annoyingly sensitive about everything. Positioning your product as manly or macho isn't about gay bashing, its about being manly. Spare me the whining!
  By Shari | Harrisburg, PA April 20, 2006 03:52:12 pm:
Mr. Garfield is quite obviously a jerk. This review is WAY off base, and frankly, I find it idiotic.
-Harrisburg, PA
  By Virginia | Ft. Lauderdale, FL April 21, 2006 10:09:59 am:
If Bob thinks this spot has reference to homosexuals, what does he think about the Nabisco Snack-Fairy?! Let's not continue to over-analyze TV spots, shall we? - VG, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
  By kirby30 | Mankato, MN April 21, 2006 05:48:37 pm:
I've viewed this ad many times and I also am disturbed by it; but not because of the alleged hate-speak, but rather I find it to be an annoying ad with a really creepy little fairy. Mankato, MN
  By Mac | Denver, CO April 22, 2006 06:26:12 pm:
Bob, you are a fairy.
  By pramal | New York, NY April 24, 2006 09:23:28 am:
Not to beat the deadhorse, but way off on this one. I also enjoy your reviews, but we all have bad days. I've been in Advertsing for more than 10 years and over and over again people try to make something out of nothing. It's JUST AN AD !!!
  By anniem | Cincinnati, OH April 25, 2006 09:42:08 pm:
I agree with Bob Garfield. This ad plays off of hateful stereotyping. The claimed ignorance of Daimler Chrysler regarding the blatant gay-bashing in this ad is worse than the ad and insults the intelligence of the viewers.
  By wmullin | Alexandria, VA April 28, 2006 08:54:53 pm:
Mr. Garfield is 100% on point in his analysis. I submitted a complaint to Dodge via their website and received only "we appreciate your love for Dodge" palaver as a response.
No sentient human being could honestly believe that the lisping doggie boy at the end of the commercial is meant to be understood as anything but a "fag" ... which is a real shame, because without the ugly ending this would have been a delightful commercial.
The fact that Dodge continues to air this ad (constantly) speaks to their utter disinterest in being responsive to their full potential audience -- a pretty stupid stance for an appropriately struggling dinosaur.
  By DougBuhrer | Columbus, OH May 2, 2006 12:08:08 pm:
The ad absolutely considers an effeminate male to be funny. Had the advertisers meant to focus on the fairy tale aspects of the story, the fairy would have zapped the brute into a man wearing a bunny suit, or a giant ice cream cone. That would have kept with the magical and childlike theme of the fairy changing a skyscraper into a gingerbread house, and a real train into a toy train. Dodge deserves the negative publicity it has received for this ad, as it definitely mocks sexual identity.
  By AMY | WALTERBORO, SC May 9, 2006 02:25:23 pm:
I am astonished by the number of responses this article evoked from subscribers. I completely agree with Bob. The usage "fairy" is a play on words referring to a homosexual man. I never took it to be "hate speech" but in this day and age, in the society of the offended I can see how it would be viewed that way. I have noticed since I read the article last week that Dodge has removed the speech from the ad. All he does now is laugh at the fairy as she splats herself against the wall, then you see her transform him. I don't know that removing the audio "silly little fairy" will fix the already existing problem. Viewers already know what was said there. Dodge is trying to save face with that omission so they don't have to come up with a new campaign for the car. I think this is a great example of how advertising really works, for the good or bad.
  By kthomason | San Francisco, CA May 10, 2006 05:40:48 pm:
Mr. Garfield is way off base here. If you look deep enough, every message everywhere *could* offend someone. This whole non-issue about the ad was started as a publicity stunt by a gay rights group. I'm surprised anyone has taken their critique seriously.
  By mpaulshore | Arlington, VA May 14, 2006 02:43:49 am:
Getting away from the main topic of Bob Garfield's review for a moment, here's a correction of an error he makes in his description of the commercial: The pre-transformation train in the Dodge Caliber commercial is not a commuter train. It's what's known in modern transit parlance as a "heavy-rail train", i.e., a subway-type train that in the course of its route may run below ground, above ground, or both. Some of the typical characteristics of heavy-rail trains are: no separate locomotive, but rather just a string of passenger-carrying cars, one or more of which are powered; cars that are larger and more heavily built than those of light-rail (streetcar-type) trains, though still less so than those of commuter trains; boarding directly to the car floor from high-level platforms, rather than by climbing stairs from the ground; electric power collected from a third rail rather than from overhead wires; and a right-of-way free of street crossings. Their route networks generally extend only a short to moderate distance from the city center. There are exceptions to these characteristics, but they are comparatively rare. Commuter trains, by contrast, are usually locomotive-hauled, and have passenger cars that in size, shape, and interior layout are somewhat similar to the kind of cars used in intercity service. Their route networks extend relatively far from the city center, sometimes even into adjacent cities.
  By sweetliberty | santa clara, CA May 23, 2006 03:20:37 pm:
Are people really this sensitive? Look, there is hate all over this world targeting a variety of types of people and lifestyles. There is also this thing called humor that is not meant maliciously. If you are a gay man who takes offense to this ad, I say get yourself a sense of homor and move on.
  By dhollist | Dearborn, MI June 7, 2006 07:05:07 am:
Isn't it all about context? You could use the word "spook" in a commercial and it would be fine, as long as the visual context didn't include a black man. In the Dodge commercial, the visual cues obviously infer that gay people are "fairies" in the same way that schoolkids use the word - in a derogatory way.
Dave Hollister, Ann Arbor, MI
  By portiansky | MELVILLE, NY June 16, 2006 10:42:33 pm:
Garfield proved one thing: you really can put an agency & their client on trial in the press until out of shear exhaustion they give up. The new recut ad deletes the line Garfield questioned. Nice going Mr. Garfield. Now how about a column on the responsibility of critics?
Luis Portiansky, New York, NY
  By [grave] | Hanover June 17, 2006 10:51:30 pm:
It is amazing to me how eager Mr. Garfield and those in agreement with him were to label this commercial as an instance of "sexual bullying." Never is the man, once adorned in his pastel colored cardigan, referred to, either explicitly or implicitly, as a "fairy." Rather, the man calls the mythical, winged creature what it is: a faerie. It is Mr. Garfield and those in agreement with him who are guilty of "sexual bullying," if you can call it that, as they are acknowledging the ridiculous stereotype that anyone who wears brightly colored clothing is a homosexual. The man, like everything else in the commercial, was transformed into a more whimsical, colorful version of his former self. If you are like Mr. Garfield, then you, in your overzealous, politcally-correct paranoia sets in, and you immediately jump to the conclusion that, because this man is dressed in more brightly colored clothing, he is being depicted as a homosexual. And, if you are like Mr. Garfield, then your reaction is completely unwarranted and is, in effect, only helping to perpetuate the harmful stereotypes which have plague homosexuals for so many years. So please, Mr. Garfield and others, suppress your urge to glorify yourselves, at every possible chance, as champions of civil rights by raising hell everytime you have a dubious impression that an image in the media has implications that may be moderately insulting to some homosexuals. There are more important things for you to focus your efforts on and, in short, you are stabbing yourselves in the foot.
  By Lashona | Milwaukee, WI June 19, 2006 05:55:46 pm:
Seriously, we have become too wrapped up in looking for something to complain about. When I first saw the commercial I thought "Strength" not gay.

As a woman I could find a reason to be offended by the "silly little fairy" comment, but I'm not. People are way too hypersensitive about everything. Pretty soon all the creativity and freedom will be sucked out of advertising. Milwaukee, WI
  By luluday | Columbus, OH June 26, 2006 09:16:00 am:
My friend, an openly gay man, told me about this ad. He thinks it's hilarious--so hilarious he actually told me about it. (So, please, enough with the "all homos are too sensitive" thing.) And, yes, he picked up on the obvious play on words (geesh--come on people--don't be so dense!), realizing that yes, the macho dude is making a derisive comment. Being turned from one stereotype into another might be considered poetic justice.

The funniest thing, though, is that my friend told me it was an ad for TOYOTA. Way to go, Dodge.
  By joebob1 | other, AZ June 26, 2006 06:00:14 pm:
Hate speech? Come on, if you think this is hate speech, then you've never heard genuine hate speech.

Get over yourself, Garfield.
  By va_connoisseur | Fairfax, VA June 30, 2006 12:56:23 pm:
Wow! You people are amazing. It is obvious you know little about the car industry. The Dodge Caliber took over for the Dodge Neon. The new ad campaign was conceived to break any connections the consumer may have between the two cars. Remember the Neon ads and the "Hi" campaign? This would be the opposite of that campaign.

Stop being so sensitive and trying to make everything an "issue". He said "Silly little fairy" to a FAIRY that was going around making ginger bread castles and candy trains. Again, let me emphasize, he was talking to a FAIRY!!! If we replace the word fairy with "flying fantasy person" would you be offended still? Geez, get over yourself
  By fewpianoman | Westfield, IN June 30, 2006 02:12:57 pm:
I am happy to see that most people disagree with Mr. Garfield on this topic. Many other people have quite eloquently said just about everything I had in mind so I won't bore anyone with too much more of the same. I do have one thing to add though. My wife and I both did not quite "get" the ad to begin with. After a couple of viewings I told her that I thought the fairy was making everything better (including the man at the end) but when the fairy got to the car she couldn't make it any better – implying that this car is as good as it gets. The whole "tough" thing was lost on us. In retrospect, I suppose we should have picked up on it, especially since I read here that there is some audio referring to the toughness of the car. I guess I'll have to listen for that the next time I see the ad. And the man at the end did not come across to us in any way as gay, but rather as preppy as someone said – and with better clothes and expensive dogs, extending my assumption about the fairy making things better. And yes, the fairy is a FAIRY! We did not take it as anything else. You may call us naďve if you want for not reading these things into the ad, but if we are naďve so are a lot of other people. I think it is more likely that those few that ARE reading things into this ad are creating something where there is nothing. With so many truly bad things in the world I think the criticism of this ad way off base. I think you very, very much missed the boat on this topic Mr. Garfield.
  By tommcgahee | Athens, GA July 6, 2006 09:45:38 am:
Let's consider the commercial's tagline, "Anything But Cute" ... Maybe I'm out of my mind, but I'm gonna go ahead and guess that the fairy is turning things "cute" with her wand. I know that's no fun because it totally takes away any room to argue about it turning things "feminine" or gay or whatever, and it even answers the couple of comments wondering why she doesn't turn the guy into some kind of toy ... I know it's just way too simple an explanation, but sorry, that's the tagline. It certainly doesn't say "Anything But Gay" or "Anything But Effeminate" ... It's "Anything But Cute." I personally LOVED the Chrysler Group's top PR guy, Jason Vines's response to the criticism -- Why do you assume the man with the dobermans in black isn't gay? Much less that the preppy (or "cute") guy is. You could only find this ad offensive to gays if you have stupid stereotypes about gay men. I personally thought the ad, and the "silly little fairy" line, were hilarious ... and I'm the least macho guy I know. I'd much rather dress/be like the sweater guy than the doberman guy, plus I know my wife wouldn't even come near me if I was the doberman guy.
  By (ShouldBeA)NobelWinner | Orlando, FL July 6, 2006 12:32:56 pm:
I think people are overreacting to this entire ad.All the bleeding liberals out there, GET OVER IT.By the way, Bob Garfield, you are a fairy if you're offended by this commercial.
  By smark13 | Baltimore, MD July 6, 2006 12:33:19 pm:
Uhh...Does anyone else think that the fairy is kinda cute? Anyone out there...?
  By sassymom08 | Auburn, ME July 6, 2006 01:41:06 pm:
Ok, I am bi. A lot of my friends are gay. None of us saw a connection to this ad and our sexuality. If you do, then tinkerbell has to go too! I love this ad, haven't laughed so much at one for a long time. By the way, I like the car too.
  By egb23 | Camarillo, CA July 6, 2006 02:11:06 pm:
I think your article is an example of what is wrong with us today. Are you serious? We can't target advertise to a certain group? Just because you may or may not like the "macho" image doesn't make it wrong or evil. I don't read everything you write but I suspect you didn't have a problem with the Grape Nuts commercial where a man's friend was attack by a bear but he couldn't hear because he was eating his crunchy grape nuts. No complaints there? I don't like dodge and I am not attracted by it's commercials. I drive a small honda and own the movie The Fern Gully but I was not offended by the commercial. What is your point? How does saying every little thing is offensive helping?
  By berdawn | Columbus, OH July 7, 2006 11:41:30 am:
The first time I saw this ad, I rewound it to see if the guy really just said, "stupid fairy" then tivo'd it to show my spouse. I was horrified. while I absolutely support free speech, that Dodge would cater to this element within so much of our culture is beyond me. of course, I also have to wonder if those who are so "get over it" would say the same if an ad included images of flag burning, same gender kisses, or someone mocking those rediculous fairy tales believed by christians.
  By 22chris | Charlottetown, PE July 9, 2006 09:45:53 am:
I have to open by saying that before reading this article, I had no inkling that there was a hateful message in this commercial, and after reading it, i feel the same. I think this debate is ridiculous. Call me niave, but when the man at the end of the commercial is transformed, I didnt think gay, I thought Ken doll. Maybe the people who have embarked on this crusade should take a step back and examine thier own prejudices and stereotypes.
  By altyris | HIGH POINT, NC July 13, 2006 01:29:36 pm:
NO - It's clearly a play on fairy tales. Any other opinion is overblown, self-important and off base.
  By H&FLabs | San Marcos, TX May 17, 2007 12:50:37 am:
Too many errors in this review to mention them all, but starting with the end where the "butch" guy is turned into a Ken doll/Preppie with two Pommies, he has a lisp when he's butch, so if there is anything to slam homosexuals, it's that, but you really have to decide that you're looking for -blank- when you start out to say, "Hey, is that code for homosexual?"

How he concludes that the mere fact that there is a fairy in the commercial is code for "homosexual" is so very, very junior high of him. Oh, wait, I said "very, very." Does that mean I think he's homosexual? Wait! I said "wait." Does that mean I think he's fat? Wait up. I said "fat," does that mean that I think he's sexy? Do I mean by "sexy" homosexual? (I could go on forever.)

Yeah, the fairy is not really a fairy, it's a symbol of hating homosexuals. The skyscraper is not really a skyscraper, it's really code for a staight man turned . . . okay, now I'm making myself about as sick as this review.

As Frued is alleged to have said, "Sometimes a banana is just a banana." Oh wait, is that code?
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News