Garfield's Ad Review
Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
Is This Dodge 'Fairy' Commercial Actually Hate Speech in Disguise?
Bod Garfield's Ad Review: Watch the Video
Faggot. Queer. Fairy. These are synonyms, epithets one and all disparaging gays -- or, more often, heterosexual men deemed insufficiently masculine. Let's call that Fact No. 1.The 'Fairy' spot was created for Dodge by BBDO, Detroit. ALSO: Comment on this review in the 'Your Opinion' section below.
Macho brand
Fact No. 2: Dodge is marketing its new Caliber subcompact as a tough little car, as opposed to sissy little Civics, Corollas and the like. This comports with Dodge's long-cultivated macho image, as exemplified by the grunting, Aerosmith heavy-metal music tag punctuating every spot.
Fact No. 3 is that one of the introductory commercials from BBDO, Detroit, features the juxtaposition of a burly tough guy and his Doberman with a sweater-draped girlie man who is walking four little lap dogs. Fact No. 4 is that the only line of dialogue in the commercial is the burly dude exclaiming, "Silly little fairy!"
And Fact No. 5 -- the genuinely astonishing fact -- is that Daimler Chrysler asserts that none of the above is meant to invoke a sexual insult.
"Was it intentional? Absolutely not," says spokeswoman Suraya Bliss, whose voice quavered as she spoke, perhaps because she was choking on the corporate line. "It's not the kind of company we are."
Preposterous corporate line
But, of course, the corporate line is preposterous. Much more likely is that someone at BBDO realized they could call people fairies if their commercial depicted an actual fairy. Get it! How subversive! A flitty little fairy! We can imagine the hilarity in the cubicle as they contrived a way to set up the "Not for sissies" selling proposition based on an innocent magical fantasy. The result-mean-spirited but undeniably crafty -- is as follows:
A winged little pixie, fluttering along an urban skyline, waves her magic wand and -- in a puff of magical dust -- turns a skyscraper into a gingerbread house. Next she turns a commuter train into a colorful toy choo-choo. Then she spies a new Dodge Caliber, which she waves at with her wand.
But nothing happens. Three times she tries her magic, to no avail. For all her efforts, the shiny black Caliber remains a tough, rugged subcompact. Meanwhile, her momentum sends her flying-splat! -- into a building.
'Silly little fairy'
A passing brute (he's also all in macho black as he walks his Doberman) is very amused by this scene. "Silly little fairy," he laughs.
So she wands him -- turning his Neanderthal getup into a wimpy tennis outfit, and his Doberman into four Pomeranians. "Oohhh!" he simpers.
Then the voice-over: "Introducing the all-new Dodge Caliber. It's anything but cute."
Oh, is it now?
Look, there's nothing wrong with positioning an economy car as a car with truck values. In fact, "the manly subcompact" is a very good idea. You can even suggest that everything else in the category looks effeminate. Though political correctness is out of control in this society, you're still allowed to choose your own sexual demeanor.
But what no advertiser has any business doing is calling people fairies, because it is cheap, because it is gratuitous, because it is hateful.
Gay and lesbian consumers
Also self-destructive, undermining Daimler Chrysler corporate entreaties to gay and lesbian consumers -- not to mention the much larger sick-of-sexual-bullying population. But never mind the business consequences.
There is simply no room in advertising for hate speech. Period.
For the record, Daimler Chrysler and BBDO protest that this spot is obviously not homophobic because the guy with the lap dogs is a preppy type-as opposed to some flamboyant queen. Of course, the same people swear they were totally unaware of the "fairy" double-entendre.
They say we're seeing things. We say they're living in a fantasy world, and it's anything but cute.
Review: Zero stars
Ad: Dodge
Agency: BBDO
Location: Detroit
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!













It seems to me that the phrase "I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally" is that which today's society tends to live by. What a sad commentary.
We've become a humorless society where it seems everyone is viewing life from a defensive posture. This leads to everything being an insult to someone, somehow, some way.
My wife and I have a broad spectrum of friends that include gays, lesbians, people of various ethnic origins, differing education levels, differing religions, and so on. When we first saw the ad we laughed out loud. It was funny! Not hateful, just funny. Of course, we have named several of our 125+lb dogs after Disney fairies (Tinkerbell and Merryweather), so maybe we're just odd. Possibly we just still have a sense of humor…
The idea that 'Faries' are not masculine or feminine - in a healthy way - is downright ignorant. Just read the any of 'The Hobbit' books. Have global book and media publishers made a fortune on 'disguised hate speech' in 'Lord of the Rings' ? I don't think so.
The 'Fairies' are some of the most healthy - and 'tough' - and heroic - masculine - and feminine - people in world literature. Why not focus on that? And they interact with 'normal' humans very well, despite their 'differences.'
No - This car ad criticism is just 'hyper-political' spite. Bob is wrong this time. Or he just doesn't read widely enough..
I could see your point if the fairy wasn't actually a fairy.
In this case, though, I think the hypersensitivity has affected you.
The guy calls a fairy a fairy. And not a male in tights with wings, but a very obvious and attractive female.
So what is the social implication of a manly man, in this case, seeing a mythological, and anatomically correct fairy take a fall, and calling said fairy a 'silly little fairy' as manly men do at all ages?
To your point, does Izod's chief PR officer need to now come down hard on you about maliciously slandering tennis outfits as 'wimpy?'
Just say you don’t like the ad. Keep it short or move onto something else if there’s nothing to besides that. That’s why we read you.
As a devil's advocate, you could say the commercial depicts the ultimate nightmare of a homophobic person. The homophobe turns into a homosexual.
If Dodge were interested in showing tolerance (or doing some damage control) in any way, they would follow up with a commercial that shows the "fairy" driving away in the "masculine" car.
I'm willing (barely) to believe that the use of the word "fairy" is intended simply to describe an actual winged, magical fairy, as depicted in the commercial (although how supposedly hip ad creatives with their finger on the pulse of pop culture might have missed the possible double-meaning, as the agency claims, is beyond me).
The problem lies with the delivery of the line "Silly little fairy." The delivery, with the clipped emphasis on "fairy" that honestly sounds like an insult, coming from the mouth of what is apparently supposed to be an uber-macho don't-screw-with-me working-class type of guy, floors me. Did they consider the context at all? (On the other side of the coin, this commercial could also be considered (albeit possibly unintentionally) in its resulting [unintentional] implication that all blue-collar, doberman-walking meathead-types are judgmental homophobes.)
Do these companies actually _watch_ these ads before approving them?
You mention epithets that are disparaging to gays -- yeah, tell it to the television producers of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy or Queer as Folk. Oh, but it's OK if "they" say it. Just like when rappers use the "N" word throughout their song lyrics. Like HELL it's OK. Classic double standard, BS. Let's call THAT fact number 1.
Garfield is so over the top, out of control with his assessment of the "meaning" behind the ad. First off, if the fairy was either a guy or a woman with a short cropped hair style I might see the point. But it's a take off on Tinkerbell for God's sake. The passing brute he refers to, calls her a silly little fairy because of one reason only....SHE IS A FAIRY!!!! Should they change the commercial and borrow a line from the famous Seinfeld episodeâ€" after he calls her a silly little fairly, he follows with "Not that there's anything wrong with that."
She turns him into a tennis playing preppie boy, not some lather clad deviant. All she did was change him into the very opposite of his persona.
And Chysler spokeswoman Suraya Bliss, whose voice quavered as she spoke â€" well perhaps that was for one reason only: because she had no clue what in this world Garfield was referring to.
Bob Garfield is reaching above and beyond for a story here. To accuse this ad of being "Hate Speech In Disguise" is a gross, blatant and vile example of the political correctness that's hammering our society and lining the pockets of litigation attorneys everywhere. If you think for one second that a corporate giant like Chrysler would intentionally make this kind of fauxpas in this day and age, you are sadly mistaken.
Bottom Line: I NEVER saw a gay bashing or hateful connotation in the ad. Does that make me a homophobe or gay hater? God, I hope not.
Does this make Bob Garfield an over the top, politically correct liberal looking to sell papers? Well if it walks like a duck...
Oh dear God...Did I accidently just make a gay reference?
Tom Zarzecki
Tom Zarzecki Jr & Associates
Oak Ridge, New Jersey
"Wuss."? Both of which, modified by "worried, handwringing, politically correct" seem to apply to you too. Why don't you go get a job decorating windows or something.
Going straight to the "hate speech" moniker is unneccessarily inflammatory and precludes any constructive debate on the topic.
To begin with, the fairy is OBVIOUSLY female. Secondly, what she does is OBVIOUSLY fantastical in nature. What is the "passing brute" supposed to say? "Now, now, there, confused, vertically challenged, mythological, winged denizen of the forest?" The protagonist is a FAIRY, not a symbol of sexual proclivity. Good gracious, man, get your head out of the latest Al Franken / Hillary Clinton conspiracy theory textbook!
Also, remember one very important fact; we live in a pluralistic society with a diversity of opinion. In case you have not read it in a while, the First Amendment does NOT guarantee you the right to not be offended. It does, however, give citizens the right to communicate in any form or fashion they see fit. That includes the presentation of promotional ideas that some may consider to be on the edge. If you really want to protest something, protest the blatant use of sex in advertising.
Look back in history. If you seek to stifle or silence opinions and observations you disagree with, eventually it will be yours they seek to silence. However, no one will be around to protest for you.
Fact No.2, The only person who insults the female fairy is punished for it.
Fact No.3, Drawing the conclusion that a man who looks overly cute and dresses effeminate is gay - is insulting to gays.
Is it a good ad? Probably not.
Is it hate speech? Probably not.
One thing much of America tends to forget is that you don't make a person gay by taking away their masculinity. To even compare this ad to hate speech is reading into this far more than anyone ever intended.
No. I could leave the answer at just no but that really does no justice to the full page of opinions by Mr. Garfield. Mr. Garfield, are you insulted in Cinderella when her fairy godmother makes her a new dress, because stereotypically homosexual men are snappy dressers? Are you insulted in Peter Pan when Tinkerbell spreads her pixie dust and everyone thinks happy thoughts so they can fly because it must be a reference to drug use among homosexuals? There are many words and associations in our current society that can be insulting if you choose to view them that way, but sometimes a fairy is just a fairy. Mr. Garfield posits that “the corporate line is preposterous” when Dodge states that the ad was in no way meant to be insulting. Mr. Garfield, really? You find it easier to believe that Dodge would risk alienating a potential customer base rather than believing that someone viewing the ad would take it at face value? As a fairy making things cute and being thwarted by the obviously not cute Dodge? I have to say before reading your column I did just that. And having spoken with others about the ad, they also did just that. Preposterous…no, I don’t think so.
And to further this breakdown in logic you use circumstantial evidence to promote that there is hate speech (" the way her voice creaked" ).. had they made the fairy a man then you could argue this, but this little winged creatures have always lived in cute little villages and twinkled along with magic wands.. a polar opposite concept to Dodges brutish brand image. I thought it was funny and made the point well.
You're ouchy stance will make only succeed in making mythical faries as unusable to us as the english words gay, queer and dyke.
I've seen this spot at least twenty times and never once considered a sexual overtone. In fact, I thought it wasn't bad. I actually laughed when I saw the little thing smack into the wall (then again, I liked Dumb & Dumber).
Like a Rorschach Test -- we all see what we want to see, whether the message was intended or not.
Lighten up.
Both are stupid and don't show the car enough to even make sense. BBDO is really driving some stupid ideas to the people who are desperate enough to try it.
I think Dodge is tryng to appeal to "rugged" and "rougher" men or personalities. I think that both male and females alike can be this target audience - if they are into outdoor-type activities etc...
I do not think their commercial contained hate speech at all. I think those that think it is are way too sensitive on this subject and are apparently not the target audience.
It's a great spot.
I think you are reding way too much into it.
My take on thespot is that the fairy is trying to improve things. But... She can't improve the car.
As for the guy and the dog... It would be no different than if she were to trn him into a frog... What then? Dodge it anti-frog?
And even if she was trying to "gay" him up... So what?
I think it only offends those that are confused with thier own identity.
But thanks for standing up for the group that always gets teased and bullied by macho america!
As a supporter of the GLBT community -- I am not completely offended. However I can see why a person might be put off by the stealthy "laugh at the girly-man" moment in this commercial.
Oh -- and enough with the "agenda" talk. The idea that gays are imposing on some of your sensitive "Christian ideals" (because they don't want to be casually mocked on television) is absurd. There's enough room at the dinner table for everyone. Even winged sprites.
I first saw this advertisement about a week ago and I enjoyed it. Not once did I get the feeling that the ad was in the least bit subversive or hateful toward homosexuals. In fact, I didn't see a single reference to sexuality in it at all! What I saw was a car company championing its dark, sleek, unaffected, smooth-riding car by contrasting it with cutesy, sugary, glittery, pastel-y world of fairy tales. That’s it, nothing more. It’s quite a stretch to say that just because a literal fairy appears as the de facto villain in the commercial, Dodge is calling anyone a fairy, let alone equating that with homosexuality. That’s like saying because the fairy reduces a skyscraper into a gingerbread house, the commercial is calling out terrorism. Whatever.
I’m as sensitive to condescension and ridicule as they come, so if there were ‘hate speech’ elements to this ad, I’d know it. Choo-choo trains and gingerbread houses don’t speak of any sexuality to me, nor do bright colors, sweaters around necks, or yippy dogs. If critic Bob Garfield sees something sexual â€" or homosexual â€" about those things, then he’s either got an overactive libido or he’s bought into the whole crazy idea that a person’s sexual identity prescribes exactly what he/she is allowed to wear, do, and enjoy in life; if anything is offensive or insulting and makes me feel pastel blue, it’s this.
I’m really hoping Bob Garfield isn’t homosexual. If he is, forget the pastels altogether and color me embarrassed; we’re not all 'homochondriacs.'
--Sean
Think it's a cute ad.
Jeff New York City
Others have expressed this already more eloquently than I can above.
Get some rest and look at it again in the morning.
By extending your reasoning, we all should rally against using any color of the rainbow in any negative or comparison advertising, lest it be interpreted by paranoids like yourself as a desecration of the gay flag.
Your comments would hold a drop of water if the fairy in the ad were a man, or better yet, a "girly man." But the fairy is very obviously a woman, and very beautiful to boot.
The English language and the way it's used suffers from people like you. Maybe you're the one who's misusing and misunderstanding the language, and misleading us with your words.
Your analysis is moronic.
I know most people will voice their opinion to disagree but I think it's obvious to almost everyone that this article was tripe. I agree he must have been under a deadline crisis and thus worked some magic similar to the fairy, to find some contraversy in nothing. - NYC
Fact No 1: The fairy is a female
Fact No 2: The fairy is a fairy
Fact No 3: N. A tiny imaginary being in human form, depicted as clever, mischievous, and possessing magical powers. (dictionary.com)
Fact No 4:
Come on Bob, do we really feel that the creative brief on the desks at BBDO Motor City asked for a clever way to gratuitously insult the effeminate and homosexual? The reality of this commercial is that this article has given it more attention and exposure than it deserves. It’s a weak idea, it’s so far out of left field it was playing a completely different sport. It doesn’t resonate with anyone let alone have the impact to offend. Besides that the car itself is indistinguishable from every other Dodge put out in 2006. This “silly little fairy’s” real intention in her games and mayhem should have been to create a marketable vehicle, instead she overshadows what is really important and creates a frenzy over fictional bias. And to say hate speech? The character that makes the statement, isn’t even a representation of anything desireable or positive. No one bigotous or otherwise leaning in their lazy-boy recliner spills juju bees as they gasp outloud to the television…”take that you fairy b*tch!” when your “neanderthal”- (also a slang and potentially offensive statement to those of slow and boorish wit) remarks that this particular fairy happens to be silly. She’s “silly” for showing up for the commercial at all. And the “tennis outfit” that you’ve proclaimed, which arguably is the only sensible point that could even be extrapolated, is more associated with new money preppy collegiate drinkers with trust funds and an overarching sense of being cultured. Ask Queer Eye alums if they’ll even be caught dead in such an outfit. It’s not a statement of or about homosexuality. But gay or straight. No one should buy this car.
Fact No. 5:
I’ll tell you though Bob, you weren’t COMPLETELY off base. They ARE Pomeranians.
Dan Frigolette-Brooklyn NY
Fact 1: The brute calls the silly little fairy a "silly little fairy" because, alas, she is a silly little fairy.
Fact 2: The brute is subsequently and comically punished for his rudeness by being transformed into a club-going prepster, not a gay.
Fact 3: Homosexuality doesn't come anywhere near this piece of creative.
For ad agency artists who created a delightful and light ad to have their work called "hate speech" is beyond reproach. I think Garfield should lose his job over this preposterous accusation unless he apologizes to the ads creators.
-Harrisburg, PA
No sentient human being could honestly believe that the lisping doggie boy at the end of the commercial is meant to be understood as anything but a "fag" ... which is a real shame, because without the ugly ending this would have been a delightful commercial.
The fact that Dodge continues to air this ad (constantly) speaks to their utter disinterest in being responsive to their full potential audience -- a pretty stupid stance for an appropriately struggling dinosaur.
Dave Hollister, Ann Arbor, MI
Luis Portiansky, New York, NY
As a woman I could find a reason to be offended by the "silly little fairy" comment, but I'm not. People are way too hypersensitive about everything. Pretty soon all the creativity and freedom will be sucked out of advertising. Milwaukee, WI
The funniest thing, though, is that my friend told me it was an ad for TOYOTA. Way to go, Dodge.
Get over yourself, Garfield.
Stop being so sensitive and trying to make everything an "issue". He said "Silly little fairy" to a FAIRY that was going around making ginger bread castles and candy trains. Again, let me emphasize, he was talking to a FAIRY!!! If we replace the word fairy with "flying fantasy person" would you be offended still? Geez, get over yourself
How he concludes that the mere fact that there is a fairy in the commercial is code for "homosexual" is so very, very junior high of him. Oh, wait, I said "very, very." Does that mean I think he's homosexual? Wait! I said "wait." Does that mean I think he's fat? Wait up. I said "fat," does that mean that I think he's sexy? Do I mean by "sexy" homosexual? (I could go on forever.)
Yeah, the fairy is not really a fairy, it's a symbol of hating homosexuals. The skyscraper is not really a skyscraper, it's really code for a staight man turned . . . okay, now I'm making myself about as sick as this review.
As Frued is alleged to have said, "Sometimes a banana is just a banana." Oh wait, is that code?