Garfield's Ad Review
Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
Dove's New 'Onslaught' Ad a Triumph
Exquisitely Combines Social Responsibility and Brand Marketing
Well, for starters, it's not just a commercial. It is a great film."Onslaught," the sequel to Dove's Cannes Grand Prix-winning viral "Evolution," should get an Oscar. In one brief minute, it indicts the culture's obsession with Barbie-doll exteriors, raises the consciousness of girls and women and exposes the inner ugliness of the so-called beauty industry. And you can't take your eyes off of it for a second.
Is there an Academy Award category for really, really short subject?
The video opens with a close-up of a sweet-faced, redheaded little girl. She could grow up to be Nicole Kidman or Peppermint Patty. The rest of the spot documents which way she'll be pressured to go. It's a fusillade of images shooting right in your face, of ultra-skinny, ultra-curvaceous, ultra-sexualized women. That onslaught is followed by a second one: (deftly faked) ad images promising women they can look "younger, taller, lighter, firmer, tighter, thinner, softer." Then scenes of women shrinking and expanding via fad diets, some graphic cosmetic surgery shots and a glimpse of bulimic purging.
Finally, the message: "Talk to your daughter before the beauty industry does."
Standing ovation here.
Apart from its raw impact, the video from Ogilvy & Mather, Toronto, also produces the exquisitely rare dovetailing (as it were) of social responsibility and brand marketing. While nominally calling attention to the Dove Self-Esteem Fund, which aims to inculcate girls with a sense of confidence and worth, the whole campaign also neatly positions Dove as the product line of choice for natural -- vs. aftermarket -- beauty.
Such seamless convergences are not easy to come by, even among the most sincere marketers. One can't help but recall the Worst Commercial Ever Made, back in the '80s by the progressive proprietors of ForEyes Optical, who were troubled by the scourge of homelessness. Their ad showed gritty docu-footage of society's human refuse beneath the superimposed message: "If you've grown used to this, you need glasses." Next came the product shot and a second proposition: "Two pair for $79."
That campaign didn't last very long. Dove's deserves to. A worthy cause, a brilliant strategy, a flawless video. It all amounts to something very close to perfection. So, yes, absolutely, four stars.
Damn, if it just weren't for the nagging hypocrisy of it all.
Viewed close up, the "Campaign for Real Beauty" is precisely the unassailable defense of human values it purports to be. But to pull back is to reveal. Dove is a brand from Unilever, which isn't so enlightened when it comes to Axe/Lynx -- whose ads portray women as slinky sex toys -- and Slim-Fast, which encourages exactly the kind of yo-yo dieting so vividly dramatized in "Onslaught."
As for Ogilvy, well -- in a bit of horrifying/delicious irony -- it is actually the U.S. agency for the Barbie doll.
Oops.
We harbor no doubts about the sincerity of all concerned. In fact, we suppose many of those involved relish the opportunity not only, for once in their careers, to promulgate a positive, genuinely humane message but to also expiate their past sins. In that sense, at least for now, the exercise is not at all cynical. On the contrary, it is the path to redemption.
The hard part will be staying on the path. What happens when Dove sales begin to flag and market share begins to slide? That will be the test of true righteousness. Does the "Campaign for Real Beauty" then get disposed of, like last year's fashions, or dubiously "enhanced," like a pair of fake breasts?
We'd like to believe that the values embraced here are invulnerable to the onslaught of market forces. But we don't.
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!










In other words, can Dove claim moral high ground when Unilever also produces Slim-Fast and Axe? And when the ad agency that helps to shape and deliver this identity also does likewise for the ultimate icon of unattainable female perfection?
Video like these work only among the self-congratulatory circle that conceived, executed and produced it. In the end, however beauty is defined, from the story of Goldilocks to Philip Roth's Shiksa Goddesses, there will be beauties and those who aspired to it...and will do what it takes to achieve a semblance of it.
Regardless of the question of brand consistency, or the hint of irony, I took this ad in the sense Buddha considered himself: "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense." Does Buddha teach? Yes. But his teachings, he realized, are a suggestion to personal evolution, not the answer in themselves. Now I do not put the beauty industry or a corporation in this philosophic or religious realm, but, as a young woman in media, I took it as: Dove is in beauty so it's easy to say they have an authority in it, but they don't actually; they know it has to do with our perceptions as a whole. They are not claiming moral high ground, they're saying if you want to see change you better do it because the beauty industry can't!
That's my interpretation, as someone who has physical insecurities yet still manages to feel beautiful and it has nothing to do with any product. Actually, I gauge myself on women I know, the fact i know what's realistic, not magazines or movies. And Dove seems to realize the same thing, this whole mentality STARTS AT HOME, not on TV.
I know the importance of measurement in advertising. But you get very little measurement until the brand is engrained in the imaginations of the target audience. This effectively does just that.
Companies like Unilevers should redefine their stance on Social moral and responsibility. While operating in a multi-faceted market and having its multiple brand presence in varied categories,it becomes even more important to address the market with a sense of belonging to the society.
At the end of the day O&M has seen its dollars and Umilever has managed to grab the attention of its loyal customers, but what is Society left with?!
Srisailan.K
K_Srisailan@Yahoo.co.in
India
In theory we shouldn't be able to seperate a brand from its message. And that's the problem.
This video only works if you pretend that Dove is not what it is: a business built around enhancing and changing womens' skin, hair
and appearance. There is a good message here, but the minute the brand comes in to claim it, that message is undermined.
It doesn't just feel hypocritical. It feels cynical and manipulative.
Many girls may see through the transparencies of this money making campaign and not think twice about it, but for many it makes them stop and think and talk to others about body image. Dove deserves credit for just starting the conversation.
Since the start of the Campaign for Real Beauty, many other brands have jumped on their bandwagon and every time a brand does, that is one less unhealthy model women have to look at. Kudos to Dove for taking the first plunge.
It's nice to see positive imagery in advertising, but it's a lot nicer when it's authentic, not just a cynical corporate trick to sell soap.
Dove is a product and products don't have beliefs or values. Companies have values, so why don't we ask Unilever?
Unilever, if you're listening, what's it going to be? Treat women like real people, or sex slaves? Pick one.
While quite cynical and skeptical usually, I'm a big fan of Dove and all they are doing to open the conversation and change expectations. I fervently hope that Unilever and many, many others will soon wake up and be inspired to give us parents that much less we have to "talk to our children" about! Instead, it's lots more fun to answer questions like "what do blind people see when they dream, mom"?
Frankly, I've always felt that Body Shop would have been a better candidate for this type of advertising; at least Body Shop can stand behind its corporate mantra and not have to answer questions about inconsistent, polar opposite communication propositions on other brands within its portfolio.
More than anything, well done to Bob Garfield for asking the important questions about the Dove campaign that I assume have been on every marketer's mind for a long time. TMA - NEW YORK, NY
And while my daughters and other people's sons are basted in a society that tries to mimic the ads and TV, I'm supposed to be able to keep her sane and self confident by just telling her what?
We have found in our family that just loving your children is the best way to build self esteem rather than lecturing them all the time (we tried both ways, believe me). Maybe, they won't shun the beauty and fashion call since it is so pervasive, but they will be confident. And if Dove is so darn sincere they and their associates could sponsor TV shows that portray girls and women more naturally in looks and character instead of the giggly sex tarts we tend to see when we turn on the tube.
There are three ironic elements to this:
1. Telling parents to talk to kids misses two important realities. 1) Kids are influenced by example, not what they're told. 2) If mothers continue to be so focused on their outward appearance and gaining acceptance of others, worry about their weight ro what people think of them, have 'beauty treatments' like manicures and pedicures, etc. the lack of change in the image problmem of the younger generation will speak for itself. It's the mother's that have to change behavior, not preach.
2. Dove encourages parents to face off against the beauty industry, and while Dove's campaigns continues to champion the rally, unhealthy female imagery and expectations are being simultaneously reinforced by the same company. The Axe/Lynx brands which targets male teenage with fantasy is also owned by Unilever. In an age of transparency, this is ill advised.
3. The celebration of the brand's inclusive point-of-view about beauty has been pushed aside, at least for now. Granted, there are challenges in keeping a fickle, short-attention span society engaged once they've become comfortable with an idea – and the rise of the reality programming genre has certainly diminished the visual distinctiveness Dove's 'real beauty' imagery.
The advice for Dove: lose the faux compassion and be authentic.
If you're serious about change, then encourage parents themselves to change and be better role models. Inspire them to be a great example for their daughters. Then perhaps there'll be sustainable change, not hollow brand gestures.