November 23, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Garfield's Ad Review

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Why Even Hardened Racists Will Vote for Barack Obama

In the Electoral Marketplace, He Had to Pass the Halle Berry Test

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

A few years back, a relative was visiting from out of town and showed us a snapshot. It was his son posing with a new acquaintance. Big smiles all around. The acquaintance was a priest. And he was black.

Why carry around this otherwise unremarkable photo and make a show of it?
Title: Unify
Candidate: Barack Obama
stars
Production: Obama media team, Washington
Image
Obama's perfunctory slogans can still send a chill up your spine.


Because the son is a five-alarm racist, and so is his dad -- the guy proudly displaying the snapshot. The subtext here -- about one micron below the surface -- was: "See? A black friend!"

Why did these folks feel the need to show off this man as if he were a two-headed goat? Did they imagine it negated the decades of "nigger" talk? God knows. But the episode demonstrated two things for sure:

1) Even hardened racists feel the impulse to believe they are no such thing.

2) Hence, they are always in the market for someone "acceptably black."

Yes, the market. And, yes, acceptably black. We used that term the other day on "Hardball with Chris Matthews" to talk about Sen. Barack Obama and watched the interviewer visibly flinch. "I'm gonna take some of the edge off of what you just said," he said.

What edge? Acceptably black means being nonthreatening to white people inclined to feeling threatened by black people. It means standard English, clean-cut appearance (or, as Joe Biden fumbled, "clean") and the most Caucasian features possible. These obviously are not objective measures of character or worth; just as obviously, they are measures of what sells to the vast, white audience. Halle Berry and Denzel Washington are acceptably black. Your local news anchors are acceptably black. Tupac was not.

Flip through a magazine and check out the ads. In any group of three or more models, one invariably will be black. (If there are six or more models, one will be Asian and one Hispanic.) Same on TV. In any commercial for beer or snack food, one of the guys on the sofa is always black. This probably misrepresents the incidence of interracial hanging out, but it isn't just tokenism. It's a harmony fantasy, buried deep in the collective conscience.

It's the snapshot of the trophy priest, writ large.

The phenomenon has many social and cultural ramifications, one of which is opportunity -- including political opportunity.

The subject of the "Hardball" exchange was Obama's latest commercial, "Unify," which deftly trades on the presidential hopeful's extraordinary ability to seduce and inspire his audiences with his messages of hope and uncompromising determination. "We have the chance to bring the nation together," he says. "A nation healed, a world repaired." He's said it so often it sounds almost perfunctory -- but Obama's version of perfunctory can still send a chill up your spine.

Matthews wanted to know if the Baptist-preacher cadences would "work with that white crowd out in Iowa." Yet when we replied, "There's a world of white people who would love to pull the lever for a black man" -- on the above-stated grounds -- and invoked the concept of acceptable blackness, that's when he flinched and felt the need to point out Obama's sterling political credentials.

Well, of course. The gentleman from Illinois does seem to be the real deal. (Disclosure here: He's the first presidential candidate of any party to impress us in our lifetime.) But to have access to the electoral marketplace, he still had to pass the Halle Berry test -- whereupon the hitherto disqualifying racial factor suddenly conferred advantage. We have no idea what will become of Obama's candidacy, but we're pretty sure he will win the racist vote.
38 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Why Even Hardened Racists Will Vote for Barack Obama
  By ANTHONY | LIGHT, MA January 7, 2008 09:17:39 am:
Hmmm... this column says a lot of important things-and has a level of honesty you will never find in the mainstream media. I'm not sure I would embrace the all encompassing term 'racist' to describe what sounds like 90% of the white population of this country.

Our relationships with people from different backgrounds, especially if their physical appearance is noticeably different from our own, is something this electoral season has highlighted. We approach same race relationships assuming the points of commonality and looking to trade on them. In many cases, we look at people from other ethnic backgrounds and fixate on the differences. I'm not sure this qualifies as racism. Just a different level of comfort in our interactions.

Obama has been masterful at showing people that the people of the US, no matter what their background, have a common set of concerns both as members of society and as US citizens. He is the first politician who has rendered meaning into the saying "that which unites us is greater than what divides us".

For that fact alone he deserves to be president.
  By Lou | Cinnaminson, NJ January 7, 2008 09:35:14 am:
The majority of votes Obama receives will be for reasons other than policy. The young will think it cool to vote for a black, the emotional will be swayed by slogans of unity and niceness, the racists by the opportunity to prove their tolerance. Those who read his latest book and pick out details will discover that he is as far left as our politicians come and will guide us further down the path the socialism. L. Antosh, Philadelphia
  By vlambert | OWINGS MILLS, MD January 7, 2008 09:48:06 am:
What about the fact that sexism TRUMPS racism in this country?!

There was notable, visible outrage in the form of protests all over the country regarding apartheid in South Africa, yet the GENDER apartheid in Afghanistan went unnoticed and unreported by the mainstream press for MANY years. (only *women* were being oppressed)

If it comes down to "tolerating" a black MAN versus (any) woman, the xenophobic white men of this country will take the lesser of the two "evils" that they fear!

Plus, anybody who has read any GOP press knows that their mission is to defeat Hillary by whatever means necessary.

It's not a difficult line of logic...
  By ronpersonal | MENDHAM, NJ January 7, 2008 10:04:41 am:
I think you have touched on something very important. I'm not sure I agree about the role of "Caucasian features" - I don't think Denzel passes the Halle Berry test - but that doesn't weaken your argument. Indeed, the frisson of self-regard that accompanies something like voting for Obama may be even greater if the black man in question looks, you know, black.

I guess it's a good thing that racists are at least embarrassed enough to want to appear otherwise. My wife's uncle has stopped making the kinds of comments that used to empty the room at family events, although the fact that his son-in-law is black may have contributed to his education.

  By bsilverstein | New York, NY January 7, 2008 11:45:49 am:
While I recognize the direct, honest approach of your column, I don't agree with it.
Obama is connecting with people because of his genuine optimism and message, not because he is "accectably black".
No politician is going to be elected if seen as threatening, regardless of race or gender. Every once in a while, people are presented with genuine hope, and are drawn to it. Don't tarnish this moment with over-analyis that insults many of all races.
Barry Silverstein
New York, NY
  By Cheryl | West Orange, NJ January 7, 2008 11:52:19 am:
I don't think Americans should go around patting themselves on the back declaring racism is dead because of Obama's results in Iowa. I believe many people are easily swayed by peer pressure and the public nature of the caucuses emphasizes that.
Let's watch what happens among white voters as we move to other states (Michigan, Florida).
Harold Ford Jr (light-skinned, keen-featured African American) was defeated in his run for Senate in Tennessee last year. I think those racist "Call me, Harold" ads had something to do with it.
  By WENDY | BURBANK, CA January 7, 2008 01:09:47 pm:
I also appreciate the writing of your column to stimulate discussion, but I too disagree with your viewpoint of "acceptable Black," as a factor of Barack Obama. The fact that he is educated,a humanitarian, and appeals to the general masses who are looking for "change," is the major factor I believe he is being supported, even by some racists. He is the candidate showing the most "promise," Black, mixed or not.....that's why he is leading. Not because "he's acceptable."
  By Jesse | Wisconsin Rapid, WI January 7, 2008 02:05:24 pm:
Mr. Garfield's comments are honest and insightful. As a black person who works in marketing communications, I appreciate his wit and candor. Chris Matthews' counterproductive (for Obama) response does not surprise: "Hardball" is one of the worst news/opinion programs, subjecting very bright and knowledgeable people to a "sound bite" (and cut-off-by-the-host) format that too often sheds more heat than light.
  By password | NEW YORK, NY January 7, 2008 03:30:04 pm:
It seems to me if he wins it is because of racists voting for him. If he loses it will be because of racists not voting for him. Also, thanks for sharing your definition of "acceptably black" as a clean cut, English speaking person. I'm sure those should not be qualifications for the future president.
  By BillJohnson | Waldorf, MD January 7, 2008 04:40:16 pm:
"Acceptably black means being nonthreatening to white people inclined to feeling threatened by black people. It means standard English, clean-cut appearance (or, as Joe Biden fumbled, "clean") and the most Caucasian features possible."

As a white American who meets the stated prerequisites, I am honored to know that I am "acceptably black."

I promise to use my new status to represent my peeps on the East Coast and to generally keep it real.
  By tschafer@ssd | BOISE, ID January 7, 2008 04:52:30 pm:
Whoa Nellie! How can this so-called article of opinion be taken seriously. Mr. Garfield cites advertising ads, both print and TV, as the source for ALL white Americans being racist. Has anyone forgotten just who chose these "acceptable-to-whites-blacks" for these ads? It was stereotypical advertising people. Little research was given to what the prospect really thought about blacks. The ad agencies chose the blacks for the ads insisting that ALL white Americans would accept this type of person. What about the non-whites? Now with the buzz about another so-called minority, hispanics, what criteria is or will be used to choose the acceptable black or whoever to this growing segment of our population.
It's foolish to take this type of dribble seriously, yet many do. -TSchafer,Integrated Marketing Specialists.
  By CHRIS | CAPE CORAL, FL January 7, 2008 05:44:14 pm:
So now--when I don't vote for Obama because I disagree with him on every policy position--you get to assume I'm racist? Good thing we live in a society where a man can be judged on the content of his character, not the color of his skin.
  By BCanseco | chicago, IL January 7, 2008 09:37:30 pm:
While I traditionally don't agree with Garfield, I find his latest to at least take into consideration the very real probability that issues of bigotry in America are not the result of blacks being paranoid, whining, or engaging in victimhood and blame-gaming.

That Barack Obama, like virtually every black politician and public figure before him has to take into account that most non-blacks—most of whom never say outloud how they really feel about blacks—will only vote for a "certain type" of black person regardless of qualifications or record.

That Garfield can see the link between "acceptable blackness" in the political arena and the destructive "acceptable blackness" majority white agencies, clients and yes--consumers inflict on black agencies, media and talent in the advertising industry is a good thing.

But what do I know? I'm just a black male with 17 years in the 90% white advertising industry that among other things marginalizes black agencies into sub-contractor status simply because they're black, while its Gen market shops hire few if any people of color. That's in addition to making casting and strategic branding considerations that place the perspectives and sensitivities of white consumers at the top of the food chain whether white consumers are said brand's core target audience or not.

That Garfield might be smart enough to recognize that this sorta of bias and cultural arrogance could impact areas of society beyond business, like say, I dunno, politics for example, is possible.

But again, I could be wrong and maybe Garfield is just a whiny hipster apologist trying to stir the pot.
  By denzil | sf, CA January 8, 2008 03:31:01 am:
I'm not sure whether I am offended by Garfield's theory and expression, but I applaud his gusto in shouting it out. We have a lousy public conversation about race in this country. Nice to see an uncomfortable pov.
  By RICHARD | TUCSON, AZ January 8, 2008 08:18:21 am:
If admitting ones past shortcomings, in this case prejudice, and displaying a new found affection, or even love, is akin to "...display ..as if a two headed goat"... I'd love to hear Bob's description of how born agin christians are mocking Christ.
  By buckfinney | Chicago, IL January 8, 2008 10:11:59 am:
I am so tired of white columnists and talking heads doing their best (but failing) to define Barack Obama within the context of the social construct otherwise known as race. The list of so-called black Americans who meet your criteria of "acceptably black" is far too long to specify. Obama's appeal obviously stems from something many of us lack: he has "it." I can't define "it" and neither can you. Don't insult black folks by comparing him to actors, particularly one that, like him, has a white mother, or a dead rapper (who actually had a LOT of appeal to many a white suburban teens, o now -- hopefully -- voters).
  By MARCO | CORAL GABLES, FL January 8, 2008 11:03:07 am:
I personally do not like this article because, regardless of its rationale or honesty, it moves the focus of the discussion on skin color rather than talent and merit.
  By potus545 | Overland Park, KS January 8, 2008 11:19:33 am:
It has been inspiring to watch Obama win the caucuses. His speech was the best political speech I have ever heard. He had a national audience and he rose to the occasion. I want to believe that we live in a nation that in a general election will judge Obama on his ability to lead, but I don't have confidence that it will. In 2000 the Bush team circulated fliers that showed John McCain's adopted daughter, who appears to be black, alleging that she was his illegitimate black love child. Republicans, who will do anything to win, will portray Obama as a baggy pants wearing, baseball cap donning, gold chain wearing drug dealer if they have to to win. I'm not saying that Obama should not win the nomination but that he better be ready for the coming onslaught of racially tinged opposition. He has yet to show he has the stomach for a real fight.

The press in 2000 and 2004 was complicit in allowing two outstanding public servants, one a real american hero, to be vilified and caricatured by the Bush team. If the press stands by and allows the same to happen to Obama, and they will because they love a horse race, it will be very difficult for him to win. Whomever Democrats choose, they had better be ready to fight. Save your idealism and hope for another time. I don't know if Obama can win or not. I do know that the people who ran the Gore and Kerry campaigns who refused to go negative and respond to republican attacks are as responsible as Bush is for the last 8 years. Our Democracy is at stake, our planet compromised and our children's future is for sale to the highest bidder. Bigotry manifests itself on the wings of conflict. And where there is conflict, ignorant, closed minds work hard to bring hope crashing to the ground. So democrats if you decide to test the American psyche giving it an opportunity to embrace its better angels, you had better appreciate the epic nature and be ready for the fight ahead.
  By drichards | CHICAGO, IL January 8, 2008 02:29:44 pm:
Bob, while your "logic" is provocative,it has the ring of "I know what I'm talking about because I'm a racist and I'm using this column to purge my soul".

Hopefully, I'm wrong about you, but the undertones are definitely there.

I tried to zero in on what major points you are trying to make. I think two percolate to the top:
1) Obama, because of his physical appearance and genetic makeup [light toned, features, and uses 'standard' English] is acceptable to Whites, particularly white racists, which means they will vote for him. You label this as passing the Halle Berry test.

2. In this instance, 'black race', which used to be a liability/handicap is an advantage in the electoral process (and by inference other avenues as well)if the Halle Berry test can be passed because white racists will be wooed.

Wow, Harold Ford must be really confused. He had all of those characteristics and the racists deep-sixed his campaign in Tennessee.

Michael Jordan, Oprah, Will Smith and Denzel must be so disappointed knowing that they could have really been successful and iconic if they had gotten a higher grade on the Halle Berry test.

Well, it's easy to see who will be Obama's VP running mate --- Derrik Jeter. Since we know that tons of baseball fans are racist, this should pretty much sew up the election for Obama.

We could also save the government a lot of money by only educating 'black' kids who pass the Halle Berry test. Why waste those dollars by educating blacks who are going to be unacceptable to whites. Since Bob Garfield hss now come up with the long sought-after formula for ending racism, we can now relax. Since racists really want to purge their souls by embracing blacks, if they pass the Halle Berry test, then let's make miscegenation the law of the land.

I now know the main reason Advertising Age doesn't have an appreciable number of Blacks on their professional staff. It's because they haven't interviewed enough who have passed the Halle Berry test. I'm sure Bob's new-found insights will remedy that situation in a hurry.

Bob, it's no secret that voters undergo an infinite number of psychological, cultural and intellectual gyrations and biases when they are behind that curtain on voting day. Size,weight,vocal patterns, education, gender, race, age, hair color, facial hair,religion, personal lives, net worth, popularity, etc [and even their stand on an issue or a number of issues]all factor in to their vote. I happen to agree with you that many whites (and blacks) will find Mr. Obama's "look" and " speech pattern" highly acceptable. But to downplay his stand on issues, his presentation skills, his 'family values', his intellect, his academic and political accomplishments, his hard work, his carfully crafted message that seems to be resonating with people ---to relegate all of this to the dust bin, while elevating his score on the Halle Berry test to Mt. Olympus heights smacks of subliminal racism, i.e., if he wins it's only because he was "white-looking" enough to be acceptable to white people, particularly racists, who are trying to get rid of their guilt. I'm sure some of that exists, but to diminish all of the other 'arrows in his quiver' is short-sighted.

Don Richards - chicago
don0224@sbcglobal.net
  By cricket | CHARLOTTE, NC January 8, 2008 03:51:03 pm:
Being a white man who, according to Mr. Garfield is likely a racist in denial and looking for any opportunity to prove otherwise, I take offense to the notion that my black friends were chosen possibly out of a subconscious desire to purge my soul of racist activity.

We're overlooking the possiblity that Barrack Obama represents fresh thinking and new ideas. That Denzel Washington and Halle Barry are class acts. And that Tupac was engaged in a very dangerous lifestyle.

  By Grant | Raleigh, NC January 8, 2008 06:04:58 pm:
As one who has watched this over-populated caucus process with some bemusement and some fascination, I'd suggest that we may need to define what is "acceptably white", too. Too old, too religious, too Mormon, too Left/Right, too female, too much-for-a-haircut...

The good news is that we have a lot of choices. The bad news is they're politicians, so trying to ascertain what they actually believe in and stand for is difficult.
  By mkaygee | Evanston, MI January 8, 2008 06:43:15 pm:
The author of this article is an idiot and a racist. But this is America, where many white people in their infinite ignorance will always think they are superior to every other ethnic group in the world! Wake up and recognize, it's a new day!
  By jessiebirks | New York, NY January 8, 2008 08:11:28 pm:
There's a fine line to walk. The media has a responsibility to acknowledge that racism and sexism exist in America today. At the same time, they mustn't give credit to such viewpoints. So far, I think the media has given little attention to the fact that racists and sexists will be allowed to vote in November. At least Bob is talking about it.
  By toddlintown | Plainfield, IL January 10, 2008 08:57:53 am:
Earlier this year, he finally found his way to the Senate bathroom without assistance. Now he's running for the presidency.



If this guy is the first presidential candidate to impress you in your lifetime, I have to ask; are you an intern at AdAge or is this your first real job? You have a lot to learn, especially when you look at your check stub and try to figure out why the government has grabbed so much of it. If Mr. Obama wins the highest office in the land, please don't moan jn a follow-up article because you're paying more than ever to satisfy his plan for income redistribution.

  By toddlintown | Plainfield, IL January 10, 2008 10:17:46 am:
It's a tough year to be a Democrat, and to have to choose between being a racist if you don't vote for Obama, and being a sexist if you don't vote for Hillary.

Fortunately Richardson is dropping out, so they don't have to bear the added burden if being anti-Latino if they don't vote for him.

  By csiceo | Jamaica, NY January 10, 2008 01:05:29 pm:
After I read the first 5 posts I got annoyed that it was mostly focused on race and sex. So instead of torturing myself by reading the others, I figured I would just add my 2 cents.


It is great that this election has a variety of choices. Feel free to vote with the candidate that reflects who you are the best; whether it be political view, race, gender, ignorance and even sexual preference - (Giuliani is still questionable for his dress rehearsal) - but that's why the United States is a Democratic union, YOU DECIDE.


On the issue about race and sex, and being acceptably black, I frown upon. Too much emphasis is placed on these reasons. We all need to realize that "IT IS NOT ABOUT COLOR (Race) OR GENDER, IT IS ABOUT BEHAVIOR." This applies to everyone. We all know that most blacks or the most talked about ones, are shun upon because of their "swagger", baggy clothes, street slang and not so "clean" cut appearance. This is their behavior; therefore in the eyes of the media they are not acceptably black. Token blackness is closer to that of Caucasian behavior thus making it acceptable.


Racism and sexism exist because of how we behave towards stereotypes and our actions determine what perspective we have on them. It is not until we stop look at color and gender and start looking at our behavior that we will be able to overlook racism, sexism and other issues that face our society.


Now that my 2 cents has been added to the jar, I hope it made some sense and someone somewhere will interpret it the way I meant it. If not feel free to let me know what you think or ask any questions: markthomas03@gmail.com


Just remember....
"It is not about color, It is about behavior."
Mark Thomas, New York, NY

  By tkmiller67 | Greensboro, NC January 10, 2008 03:31:26 pm:
I'm sure Obama will be glad to know that he needn't waste any more time on campaigning since apparently he only had to be "acceptably black" to sew this one up. WOW! What in the world was he thinking spending all that time on education, honest living and political studies? PULEASE! Stop it, just stop it with the race thing. I sincerely hope that people will not vote for (or reject) Obama simply because he is black or for Hillary simply because she is a woman. While the election of either of these potential candidates would indeed be a ground-breaking event in our nation's history (the first non-white or the first female president) personally I would hate to be remembered as only that.
  By jtmaguir | Boston, MA January 11, 2008 12:02:31 pm:
Dear Writer,

Honesty in media is a rarity, and such a touchy subject as racism dealing with elect-ability will not be touched by most media sources. So it's refreshing to see someone taking a stab at it and taking a risk. I'd like to see Obama win, and I think people will overcome their own racism when they realize what he brings to the table for America. He won't be crying at a news conference about what he wants to do to change this place. He's got the confidence to hit sink the eightball. And so far he's kicking butt with his campaign.

As far as the tokenism is concerned I think it's an unfortunate aspect of marketing that alot of us see and deal with. Is it right, is it natural is it real? I don't know we all deal with ideals that drive consumer acceptability. It's as distasteful to me as it is to you. America needs less make up, less vanity, and less stereotyping. And in return maybe we'll get honesty, and integrity back for the future.
  By ecrmedia1 | Jacksonville, FL January 11, 2008 04:16:33 pm:
Unbelievable. It's probably a good thing that the race and sex card are out in the forefront because it will hopefully make the ignorant see their inadequacies. Obama is the face of the new America. He represents what our population is becoming. Hillary is doing the right thing by proving that women should have an equal shot at the office. Other countries, including a muslim country, Pakistan, had women lead them. What is the matter with us? We hide behind the cloak of "political correctness" and no one wants to admit to racism or sexism, but it needs to be in their face and they need to be embarrassed by their ignorant and archaic views. As a nation of plurals, we have no right to segregate people based on what we see on the outside. It's never about the package, it's about the contents. So, all of you ignorant racist louts out there, stop wallowing in your fear of the different and embrace the fact that you're damned lucky to be an American. Someone in your past had the foresight to come over here for a better life. Learning to all work together and get past the outward differences would be a step in the right direction. I would love to see this abominable behavior obliterated in my lifetime. - E. C. Rosheck, Jacksonville, FL
  By KenWheaton | New York, NY January 11, 2008 05:29:43 pm:
What I find funny here is that all of those people lecturing about the need to focus on issues instead of race/sex don't seem to stop and think for one moment that the main reason that Hillary or Barack might lose is not because one is a woman and the other is black, but rather because they're both Democrats ... or are you expecting Republican voters to simply STOP caring about issues and switch to the other side only to "make history."


After all, how willing would Democrats be to cross over party lines if Colin Powell or Condoleeza Rice were running on the Republican ticket?

  By MIGUEL | CHICAGO, IL January 11, 2008 08:22:35 pm:
You are so, so, so right.
- Miguel H Gonzalez, an acceptable Hispanic
  By peterverkooijen | BROOKLYN, NY January 12, 2008 11:45:47 pm:

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are both very effective demagogues with very little substance.

The arguments in their favor all boil down to that they somehow represent "change" or "hope". What "change" exactly is rarely spelled out. The implicit message is that a black or female President would redeem us from all our sins as a racist, testosteron-driven society.

I know all AdAge readers are supposed to be Dems and that I'm way out of line criticizing our Saviours. I must be a racist/sexist in need of ideological reeducation!

  By mikethomp6 | Fayetteville, AR January 14, 2008 10:48:46 am:
People should really do some research on our candidates. Obama is only black to the eye. In fact he is a Muslim that will not recite our pledge or show Honor or Patronage to our flag. That is why we should not and can not vote for Obama, not because the color of his skin. We might as well vote Bin Laden in to office.

Signed,
Michael (an acceptable blck man)_
  By KenWheaton | New York, NY January 14, 2008 11:36:24 am:
Mr. Thompson,
Perhaps you should do some research as well. I'm no Obama supporter, but I'm sure his pastor at his Christian church would be surprised to find out Barack is a Muslim.


Not that his Church seems to be a great deal better than the Nation of Islam http://tucc.org/home.htm

  By ahughes981 | San Francisco, CA January 30, 2008 01:01:54 pm:
Obama is NOT a Muslim!! PLEASE for the love of God do more research before assumption. In our society, let alone our country, we have the tendancy to automatically and sub-consciously racially profile a person. Sure his name sounds a bit Middle-Eastern but his mother is in fact white and his father is African. He said it in his debate. IF anything, Obama is a reflection of the [somewhat] progress that America has made, as does Hilary.

Bob, you kill me sometimes but I have to agree with you on this one.
  By bumaye | Toronto, ON February 10, 2008 09:19:02 pm:
Based on the last few comments I've learned the following about American views on race and religion: If you're muslim then you're not really black, and if your mom is white and your dad is African then you can't be muslim, and if you don't vote for someone because they're black you're a racist, but if you don't vote for them because they're muslim then you're a patriot.

And bye the way, his middle name is Hussein!! Everyone run for the hills!!!

  By jabailo | Kent, WA February 15, 2008 10:36:21 pm:
I grew up Italian-American in South Ozone Park, Queens in the 60s and 70s. There could be no more racist place on earth in terms of dialog. Some folk would pepper every other sentence with a reference to some ethnic group. Archie Bunker? A middle-aged bloated white guy of Anglo ancestry? Forget it -- more like a 14 year old named Denunzio wearing a skin tight stretch polyester shirt and a plastic brush tucked in his jeans.

Anyway, the strange thing is: there's talk and there's action. There's being there and there's not being there. So, when I was working in the mailroom during summers, down on John Street, my co-worker from Jersey City would rant about the blacks and the Puerto Ricans. His heroes? Muhammed Ali and Sly Stone! Go figure. And if a black guy walked in from UPS to deliver something, he was a natural as could be. On the other hand, at night, in a gang, with his buddies -- who knows what kind of violence might have happened.

But that's just Street.
  By Jessica1984 | Akron, OH May 17, 2008 01:50:21 am:
White people in America are starting to wise up. They don't tell pollsters, but they are beginning to see themselves as an ethnic group. And because of this insight they see themselves under attack.

Of course you have to bee pretty gullible to not see the scam by the anti-whites who plan to profit by sending white Americans on the titanic guilt trip.
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News