November 21, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Garfield's Ad Review

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Cheetos Ads That Promote 'Random Acts' Are Irresponsible

What Should We Think When a Top Advertiser Borrows a Marketing Strategy From the Drug Trade?

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Remember the acronym "RAoC." It will be useful when the lawsuits start coming in.

That should begin presently, if the "Orange Underground" campaign for Cheetos from Goodby, Silverstein & Partners, San Francisco, works at all. RAoC stands for "Random Acts of Cheetos," and the idea is to recruit users to perpetrate Cheetos-centric pranks against those who deserve comeuppance -- like tossing a handful in somebody's dryer load of whites at the Laundromat. Ha ha!

Title: Mr. Clean
Marketer: Cheetos
stars
Agency: Goodby, Silverstein & Partners, San Francisco
Image
Adolescent angst. This is powerful psychology and therefore fertile ground for someone wishing to cultivate that demographic.
As the (unbelievably amateurish) 20-something orangeunderground.com presenter says, pointing to an outsize Cheeto in a glass case, "The third rule of RAoC is to stick it to The Man, preferably with one of these."

Get it? Alienated teenagers and young men chafe against authority. So frustrated and resentful are they about their humiliating powerlessness, they tend to lash out -- or at least fantasize about lashing out -- at the powers that be.

That would be mainly parents, teachers, principals and bosses, but anyone and anything will do -- which explains the tens of thousands of mailboxes destroyed each year by baseball bats, with a trail of Mike's Hard Lemonade bottles littered along the curb.

The perpetrators don't necessarily harbor animus toward the U.S. Postal Service.

They just harbor animus in general.

Adolescent angst. This is powerful psychology and therefore fertile ground for someone wishing to cultivate that demographic. Ask any tattoo artist or death-metal performer or drug dealer or anyone else in the rebellion industry.

But here's a question: What should we think when a leading national advertiser borrows a marketing strategy from the drug trade?

Here's an answer: It's cynical and disgusting. Not quite as disgusting as the 1994 Nintendo campaign that encouraged teenagers to defy adults and "Hock a loogie at life," but plenty disgraceful in its own right, because there is another word for Random Acts of Cheetos: vandalism. The Cheetos Underground explicitly incites its shadowy network of crap eaters not only to perpetrate mischief but to document their petty crimes on video for the Cheetos website.

One (admittedly (perversely) funny) example, in a video spot titled "Mr. Clean," is about a Cheetos-scarfing office messenger distributing reports from cubicle to cubicle and encountering the work space of a neat-freak colleague. Everything in the cube is arranged at absolute right angles, including the surgical tools he uses to manicure his Bonsai maple. So, egged on by Chester -- Cheetos's devil-on-the-shoulder mascot -- our antihero uses his snack food to defile the cube. He smashes a Cheetos inside the guy's laptop. He coats the guy's iPod ear buds with orange powder and so on.

Later, when the (vaguely effeminate, hmmm) victim encounters the crime scene while talking on his cellphone, he stops cold and says, in his wound-too-tight, anal-retentive way, "There's been an incident. I have to go."

Another spot is about an obnoxious, pretentious yuppie showing off some expensive, abstract inkblot of a painting to his friend. When he leaves the room, the friend smears Cheetos dust all over it.

Can you see how this is all destined to lead to litigation? Or worse? Can you see how ethically bankrupt it is -- Frito-Lay in the role of Ken Lay?

But it's not just that this campaign is mean-spirited and reckless and generally contemptible. It also ultimately makes no sense. Where does a multibillion-dollar division of PepsiCo come off dissing The Man? Dude, PepsiCo is The Man.

You like crunchy snacks and want to join a real Orange Underground? Sweet. Boycott Cheetos and eat carrots.
20 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Cheetos Ads That Promote 'Random Acts' Are Irresponsible
  By ANTHONY | LIGHT, MA May 27, 2008 08:55:30 am:
"Dude, PepsiCo is the man."

Bob, I thought you were The Man...

The idea of co-opting youth rebellion for commercial purposes has been around since the first Che Guevara T-shirt was produced. And probably sold by Bill Graham Productions.

The Tony the Tiger Mini-Me with the English accent is the most questionable thing about this campaign. But I'm still looking forward to someone using a Cheeto to create something cool like a "Mentos in the Diet Coke bottle" moment.
  By shaymein | BALDWIN, WI May 27, 2008 09:05:44 am:
lame. this is such a sad attempt at hitting the target. it's a bag of chips not some new interactive gadget.

i agree with you mr. garfield.
  By lmckerns | ROYAL PALM BEAC, FL May 27, 2008 10:07:27 am:
Priceless - Remember the acronym "RAoC." It will be useful when the lawsuits start coming in.

PR and marketing would do well do remember the medical doctor's adage: First, do no harm. And in this case, the harm is to the brand. (They don't have to try so hard - who doesn't like salted cheese powder?)Try dipping the carrot in that!
  By AtlasEinstein | New York, NY May 27, 2008 10:30:29 am:
A surprisingly lame effort from one of the top creative agencies in the country. I always expect good to great work from Goodby. You can't win them all.
  By odie | Wingate, NC May 27, 2008 10:41:59 am:
Oh boy, now not only can consumer 'protection' types take pot shots at the marketing profession, now even those of us in marketing can take warranted pot shots at marketing efforts. Let's see - a campaign that deliberately tells teens to be vandals - yep sounds like grounds for law suits to me. What was PepsiCo thinking?
  By malcolmkass | Dallas, TX May 27, 2008 11:02:49 am:
Is this ad campaign lame. Yes.

Will this come even close to litigation. No.

Is Mr. Garfield "Irresponsible" concerns valid. Wronger than wrong.

His concerns are grossly simplistic and irrelevant and his ethical arguments are lazy at best. What a terrible post.
  By howie@skypulsemedia | Los Angeles, CA May 27, 2008 11:12:15 am:
I love the campaign. And nothing done with Cheetos can be viewed as destructive unless you ruin someones clothes. But your clothes get ruined slowly every day you walk outside into the smog which also causes asthma and death. We have a war no one cares about. If we stood up and said stop killing maybe then you would have a RAoC point. When a country condones theft and murder like we do.....you can't take a stand against RAoC.
  By jeremyatpostadvertising | postadvertising, NY May 27, 2008 12:21:26 pm:
"His concerns are grossly simplistic and irrelevant and his ethical arguments are lazy at best. What a terrible post." I completely agree with you on these points, Malcolm from TX.

Mr. Garfield: The forces that oppose entropy are always those that have the most to lose. I personally think this campaign isn't very sharp, and I know you do, too. But I think what really scares you about it is that it just might work.

As puerile as I think comparing a criticism of an advertising campaign in Ad Age to criticism of war, etc (Howie Goldfarb's comment), it's not entirely inappropriate here, as Mr. Garfield's moralistic, sputtering tone invites it. Again, is bad advertising something that invites that level of emotion? Or is it the possibility of chronicling the destruction of an edifice from within?
  By tkmiller67 | Greensboro, NC May 27, 2008 02:07:21 pm:
Just because good advertising incites a response to the product, it doesn't excuse irresponsible advertising which incites criminal activity. Most states have laws on the books (no matter how archaic) that make some of the acts of Cheetos portrayed in the commercials actionable. I think it's the worst kind of irresponsible ad. You could also "invite a level of emotion" with a TV ad promoting a public execution. It's still socially irresponsible.
  By smartham | White Plains, NY May 27, 2008 09:54:19 pm:
Irresponsible or not is sort of irrelevant. It's just not funny or cool. Kids of any age aren't lining up to be a part of this dorky "group" (just check the site's blog posts - or lack of 'em). Besides, any kid wanting to be destructive or violent doesn't need incentive from corporate America (and DEFINITELY will not be doing it with a Cheeto).
  By sweetpong | minneapolis, MN May 28, 2008 11:21:30 am:
if a kid acts out from tv commercials or any act that is blatantly "bad", it could just mean the kid is destructive and just not original.
  By seanm | SAN FRANCISCO, CA May 28, 2008 02:24:02 pm:
The atmosphere created by the ads is intriguing, and I remember them. That's more than I can say for 99.9% of ads out there.

And please, talk about reading waaaay to far into the subtext...

Nobody will actually take this seriously, and if they do, they would probably be causing trouble anyway. That's like saying people actually believed that popping a Mentos would automatically excuse intrusive, rude behavior in the 90s.

And the little snub toward casting an effeminate neat-freak? I know what you're trying to say there, but I disagree, and again I think you're reading too far into it.

Seems to me this post is more about stirring up readers than putting forth a meaningful critique...
  By kwohler | Overland Park, KS May 28, 2008 05:40:52 pm:
Irresponsible? I don't think so. But the Cheetos ads are disturbing in one respect. They have taken a mascot that was once a "cool" representative and made him creepy. It's the same thing that Burger King has done to the King. What's next? Will Tony the Tiger start making pitches for Frosted Flakes from a dark alley? ((SHUDDER)) I long for the days when corporate images and mascots were made to be inviting instead of disturbing.
  By patrickbyers | Bellevue, WA May 29, 2008 02:21:41 am:
Is Cheetos irresponsible? The conflict between commerce and conscience usually is.


On The Responsible Marketing Blog (http://responsiblemarketing.com) we tackle issues like this all the time.


It makes an interesting topic when you begin to ask the question, what is Responsible Marketing?


One of the seven keys to Responsible Marketing is SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.


Is this campaign socially responsible? Probably not. It's one thing to create an ad that gives kids ideas. It's completely another to build a movement that encourages "Jackass"-type behavior in order to build YouTube content.


Teen angst? Teens seek authenticity. I'm not sure if this campaign passes muster.


Patrick Byers
The Responsible Marketing Blog
http://responsiblemarketing.com

  By STEVE | BRIARCLIFF, NY May 29, 2008 11:50:26 am:
People need to stop being so sensitive!
  By Bernie | OREFIELD, PA May 30, 2008 12:16:35 pm:
All I can say here is that I think everyone who thinks this is way-cool and that Bob is reading too much into please make yourself availabe to a Cheetos dust up. iPods look very attractive with an orange hue.
It's also sad that since no one seems to be eating Cheetos that the company is trying to find alternate uses for the product. Whe
Coca-Cola sales go south, we can always use it to shine the chrome on our cars. At least that would be beneficial. Maybe we could use Cheetos for insulation? Could be a good tie-in with Home Depot being they have an orange logo.
  By nick | Lincoln, NE May 30, 2008 02:50:50 pm:
The cheetos campaign to me was just an extension of the old joke about the guy who went to the doctor because his private parts had turned yellow. When the doctor asked what the guy had been up to lately, he said that since his girl dumped him, he's just been sitting around his apartment watching television and eating Cheetos. Wasn't that funny then, isn't that clever now.
  By skynet10011 | New York, NY June 1, 2008 01:47:52 pm:
I'd love to model the ROI on this campaign. Typically, 2% of the audience are affected enough to evoke a response or action.


If this follows, then 2% will respond and an additional 2% will be negatively affected by the RAoC. Depending upon the "Act" a 10X negative Word Of Mouth multiple might occur. Even better some percentage will retaliate, or pass it along.

Seems to me the ROI might be double or triple the average. It will just come down to how much "sh*t" stick to the brand vs the prankster.

  By nfagan | Coral Gables, FL February 9, 2009 06:24:09 pm:
I find this comparable to the CP+B Volkswagon GTI campaign a few years ago. In the commercials, "The Fast" encouraged drivers to break speed limits, dump girlfriends, etc. Generally, they were encouraged to act irresponsibly. I never thought that campaign was questionable, and I don't consider the Cheetos campaign to be crossing any lines either.
  By heidi52 | Groveland, MA March 17, 2009 12:33:11 pm:
Since the message from Cheetos is that it is ok to commit random acts of vandalism. I'm going to heed the call. Whenever I am in a store that carries them I am going to smash, or open as many packages as I can. Whooo Hooo won't that be fun! And I'm sure Frito Lay will get a big kick out of it.

Like the idea? Join in, I'm sure there is a store near you. Chester will be proud!!!!

H Scholes
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News