Garfield's Ad Review
Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters
Cheetos Ads That Promote 'Random Acts' Are Irresponsible
What Should We Think When a Top Advertiser Borrows a Marketing Strategy From the Drug Trade?
Remember the acronym "RAoC." It will be useful when the lawsuits start coming in.That should begin presently, if the "Orange Underground" campaign for Cheetos from Goodby, Silverstein & Partners, San Francisco, works at all. RAoC stands for "Random Acts of Cheetos," and the idea is to recruit users to perpetrate Cheetos-centric pranks against those who deserve comeuppance -- like tossing a handful in somebody's dryer load of whites at the Laundromat. Ha ha!
orangeunderground.com presenter says, pointing to an outsize Cheeto in a glass case, "The third rule of RAoC is to stick it to The Man, preferably with one of these."
Get it? Alienated teenagers and young men chafe against authority. So frustrated and resentful are they about their humiliating powerlessness, they tend to lash out -- or at least fantasize about lashing out -- at the powers that be.
That would be mainly parents, teachers, principals and bosses, but anyone and anything will do -- which explains the tens of thousands of mailboxes destroyed each year by baseball bats, with a trail of Mike's Hard Lemonade bottles littered along the curb.
The perpetrators don't necessarily harbor animus toward the U.S. Postal Service.
They just harbor animus in general.
Adolescent angst. This is powerful psychology and therefore fertile ground for someone wishing to cultivate that demographic. Ask any tattoo artist or death-metal performer or drug dealer or anyone else in the rebellion industry.
But here's a question: What should we think when a leading national advertiser borrows a marketing strategy from the drug trade?
Here's an answer: It's cynical and disgusting. Not quite as disgusting as the 1994 Nintendo campaign that encouraged teenagers to defy adults and "Hock a loogie at life," but plenty disgraceful in its own right, because there is another word for Random Acts of Cheetos: vandalism. The Cheetos Underground explicitly incites its shadowy network of crap eaters not only to perpetrate mischief but to document their petty crimes on video for the Cheetos website.
One (admittedly (perversely) funny) example, in a video spot titled "Mr. Clean," is about a Cheetos-scarfing office messenger distributing reports from cubicle to cubicle and encountering the work space of a neat-freak colleague. Everything in the cube is arranged at absolute right angles, including the surgical tools he uses to manicure his Bonsai maple. So, egged on by Chester -- Cheetos's devil-on-the-shoulder mascot -- our antihero uses his snack food to defile the cube. He smashes a Cheetos inside the guy's laptop. He coats the guy's iPod ear buds with orange powder and so on.
Later, when the (vaguely effeminate, hmmm) victim encounters the crime scene while talking on his cellphone, he stops cold and says, in his wound-too-tight, anal-retentive way, "There's been an incident. I have to go."
Another spot is about an obnoxious, pretentious yuppie showing off some expensive, abstract inkblot of a painting to his friend. When he leaves the room, the friend smears Cheetos dust all over it.
Can you see how this is all destined to lead to litigation? Or worse? Can you see how ethically bankrupt it is -- Frito-Lay in the role of Ken Lay?
But it's not just that this campaign is mean-spirited and reckless and generally contemptible. It also ultimately makes no sense. Where does a multibillion-dollar division of PepsiCo come off dissing The Man? Dude, PepsiCo is The Man.
You like crunchy snacks and want to join a real Orange Underground? Sweet. Boycott Cheetos and eat carrots.
Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!














Bob, I thought you were The Man...
The idea of co-opting youth rebellion for commercial purposes has been around since the first Che Guevara T-shirt was produced. And probably sold by Bill Graham Productions.
The Tony the Tiger Mini-Me with the English accent is the most questionable thing about this campaign. But I'm still looking forward to someone using a Cheeto to create something cool like a "Mentos in the Diet Coke bottle" moment.
i agree with you mr. garfield.
PR and marketing would do well do remember the medical doctor's adage: First, do no harm. And in this case, the harm is to the brand. (They don't have to try so hard - who doesn't like salted cheese powder?)Try dipping the carrot in that!
Will this come even close to litigation. No.
Is Mr. Garfield "Irresponsible" concerns valid. Wronger than wrong.
His concerns are grossly simplistic and irrelevant and his ethical arguments are lazy at best. What a terrible post.
Mr. Garfield: The forces that oppose entropy are always those that have the most to lose. I personally think this campaign isn't very sharp, and I know you do, too. But I think what really scares you about it is that it just might work.
As puerile as I think comparing a criticism of an advertising campaign in Ad Age to criticism of war, etc (Howie Goldfarb's comment), it's not entirely inappropriate here, as Mr. Garfield's moralistic, sputtering tone invites it. Again, is bad advertising something that invites that level of emotion? Or is it the possibility of chronicling the destruction of an edifice from within?
And please, talk about reading waaaay to far into the subtext...
Nobody will actually take this seriously, and if they do, they would probably be causing trouble anyway. That's like saying people actually believed that popping a Mentos would automatically excuse intrusive, rude behavior in the 90s.
And the little snub toward casting an effeminate neat-freak? I know what you're trying to say there, but I disagree, and again I think you're reading too far into it.
Seems to me this post is more about stirring up readers than putting forth a meaningful critique...
On The Responsible Marketing Blog (http://responsiblemarketing.com) we tackle issues like this all the time.
It makes an interesting topic when you begin to ask the question, what is Responsible Marketing?
One of the seven keys to Responsible Marketing is SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
Is this campaign socially responsible? Probably not. It's one thing to create an ad that gives kids ideas. It's completely another to build a movement that encourages "Jackass"-type behavior in order to build YouTube content.
Teen angst? Teens seek authenticity. I'm not sure if this campaign passes muster.
Patrick Byers
The Responsible Marketing Blog
http://responsiblemarketing.com
It's also sad that since no one seems to be eating Cheetos that the company is trying to find alternate uses for the product. Whe
Coca-Cola sales go south, we can always use it to shine the chrome on our cars. At least that would be beneficial. Maybe we could use Cheetos for insulation? Could be a good tie-in with Home Depot being they have an orange logo.
If this follows, then 2% will respond and an additional 2% will be negatively affected by the RAoC. Depending upon the "Act" a 10X negative Word Of Mouth multiple might occur. Even better some percentage will retaliate, or pass it along.
Seems to me the ROI might be double or triple the average. It will just come down to how much "sh*t" stick to the brand vs the prankster.
Like the idea? Join in, I'm sure there is a store near you. Chester will be proud!!!!
H Scholes