November 26, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Garfield's Ad Review

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Domino's Apology Video Isn't Going to Erase Those Images

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Poor Domino's.

It will be very difficult for anybody to order a sandwich or a pizza there for, say, the next 200 years without imagining a curl of cheese being stuck first in the cook's nose. Or worse. This thanks to two nincompoops and their YouTube video about their zany food-defilement high jinks.

Putting aside for a moment how these rascals possibly believed they could punk their employer without losing (at least) their jobs, the whole thing is just so unfair to the chain. Not because no Domino's employee ever does something repulsive with the ingredients but because the incidence of food defilement is surely distributed among chains, and non-chains, as evenly as can be.

Marketer: Domino's
stars
Agency: In-house
Domino's responded by trotting out its president, Patrick Doyle, in a YouTube video with approximately the same production values as the one at issue.
If you're going to avoid Domino's because God knows who just hawked a loogie into your Cheesy Bread, you may as well stay away from Quizno's, too. And McDonald's. And the diner around the corner. When you fill the crappiest minimum-wage jobs with adolescents and other bottom-tier labor, you will get your share of the anarchic, the embittered, the antisocial, the goofy and the just plain stupid.

None of this knowledge does Domino's the slightest bit of good. This episode has nothing to do with statistics or with logic. It has to do with images -- i.e., farting on the salami slice -- that, fairly or unfairly, will be associated with Domino's for a long time to come.

So what's a multinational pizza slinger to do?

At times like this, everybody goes to the case histories, which lead inevitably to 1982, when some sociopath killed seven Chicagoans by lacing Extra Strength Tylenol capsules with cyanide. Johnson & Johnson, itself a victim of the crime, was widely hailed for acting quickly, removing all of the product from its shelves and making all subsequent versions of the product tamper-proof. After watching the brand's market share plummet immediately from 35% to 8%, J&J recouped its share within a year.

Alas, you can't triple-seal a pizza.

Nonetheless, Domino's was under pressure to respond, and respond it did -- by Twittering like mad and trotting out the president of Domino's USA, Patrick Doyle, in a YouTube video with approximately the same production values as the one at issue.

"Recently we discovered a video," he said, sounding tired and sad, "of two Domino's team members who thought that their acts would be a funny YouTube hoax. We sincerely apologize for this incident. ...

"Although the individuals in question claim it's a hoax, we are taking this incredibly seriously. ... The two team members have been dismissed, and there are felony warrants out for their arrest. The store has been shut down and sanitized from top to bottom. There is nothing more important or sacred to us than our customers' trust."

Etc., etc. Auditors in stores, re-examination of hiring practices, restoring trust. Doyle says the right things. But:

1) "Team members?" Doesn't an episode like this point to the glaring ridiculousness of Corporate Speak? Wouldn't this be a time to let it go?

2) Sure, they had to act quickly, but couldn't somebody find this dude a teleprompter? He's looking off camera as he reads his script. Why? If ever there was a time for eye contact, this is it.

3) Why no newspaper and TV ads? The Twitter and YouTube response is all well and good, but this story is everywhere. It cannot be contained on the web, and it cannot be contained by the web, either.

Poor Dominos, yes -- but not too poor, we hope, to invest in its ongoing reputation.

15 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Domino's Apology Video Isn't Going to Erase Those Images
  By rob | new york, NY April 20, 2009 09:20:54 am:
You're overthinking this, Bob.

Although most of us pizza lovers would never ever buy a pizza from a chain outfit in the first place, we've come a long way from the old Tylenol era. We're not total idiots. We know that food preparers may be doing stuff like this in pretty much every food establishment—including the fanciest restaurants—since there are unhappy, pissed-off, angry, underpaid nincompoops all over. It's inherent in the economics of the food biz, from the fast fooders to the ritzy joints, too. Odds are it's gonna happen.

And while I agree with you that the Domino corporate-speak sounds absolutely ludicrous, I think they did an OK job by responding without making a federal case out of it. Their response was measured. And for me, that put the incident in its proper perspective.

Sure, Domino's sales will be off for a while. But Americans are not likely to punish Domino's for the sins of a few a-holes. It would be different if Domino's itself was found to knowingly use tainted ingredients. Or if they systematically followed unsafe food handling practices. Or if they treated customers differently based on race. Those would be major problems. This is a molehill.
  By nickkinports | Chicago, IL April 20, 2009 09:32:22 am:
  By hartleysw | Birmingham, AL April 20, 2009 09:34:23 am:
I tend to agree with rob on this one. I think most people will brush this off as an isolated incident, and not a chain-wide problem.

As to how Domino's responded to this incident, Monday morning quarterbacks/marketing communications professionals will second guess Domino's no matter what they had done.
  By wandawoo | Murfreesboro, TN April 20, 2009 11:19:14 am:
Well, if nothing else, it does prove that "..a picture is worth a thousand words." Television with its sight, sound and motion, has always been the most powerful medium (youtube is like mini-TV but with more channels). I don't know, guys. Once this visual is in your mind, it's hard to shake; and, yeah, we all know this goes on in food establishments all over the world (remind me to tell you about Marshall Durbin's, hamburgers and a guy's armpits), YUCK! But you know what they say, "outta sight, outta mind." I agree with Mr. Garfield.
  By artk56 | NEW YORK, NY April 20, 2009 12:23:07 pm:
Sorry...but I do see this as a serious problem...not just an incident. Hard to get past the image of "little supervision" this act created. And that image now is attached to the full chain. The youtube posting does little to get rid of it.
Suggest some new better quality control procedures...consider even getting rid of the "back room". What is going on back there that the customers can't see? Mind you, I have not been in a Dominics...maybe ever. But, my image is you order out front...and then it goes "back there."
Contrast this with the great pizza turned out at a very fair price right here in the Union Square area on NYC, Piola.. The prep, the brick oven...it's all there to see.
Arthur Kriemelman
  By ckfio | MIami Beach, FL April 20, 2009 03:12:15 pm:
You wrote: "When you fill the crappiest minimum-wage jobs with adolescents and other bottom-tier labor, you will get your share of the anarchic, the embittered, the antisocial, the goofy and the just plain stupid."

Who exactly do you expect to do the job if not "adolescents and other bottom-tier labor"? Would you? Or, are you implying that these jobs should NOT be minimum-wage jobs?

I think you are right to assume that it has to do with who works there, but the problem lies in the hiring process. They need stricter guidelines to follow and be very careful of who's in charge of interviews and approvals.
  By mark | New York, NY April 20, 2009 06:44:47 pm:
Hey - I believe this is the same chain that pioneered the Oreo Cookie Pizza. I was repulsed long before the nostril cheese incident.
  By GEORGE | BOISE, ID April 20, 2009 10:11:52 pm:
Bob...
You are dead on with this... All these douchenozzles saying it is an isolated incident are nuts... You know this shit goes on all the time in joints that employ retards at minimum wage with no benefits... They hate their fucking job, even if the are "team members." If you patronize these places, you have to expect snot on your sub... And Dominos waiting 48 hours to respond is insane... This is the fucking Internet age... You could be out of business in 48 hours.
Cheers/George
  By ltotino | CHICAGO, IL April 21, 2009 10:00:50 am:
What ever happened to people taking pride in their job? I had a minimum wage job and liked it---I knew it was a stepping stone to teach me responsibility and how to work with other people. Is it really about the money and no benefits? I doubt it. I think they would do it regardless how much they were paid. Is it about respect? Absolutely. You earn respect. These jerks should start thinking about where they are eating...
  By Robert A. B. | New York, NY April 21, 2009 11:59:38 pm:
Welcome to the age of idiot-generated content. A culture of narcissism and growing alienation combined with access to media does not bode well for any brand. The response to these kinds of attacks, and they are attacks, is to neutralize their impact by immediately seeking to remove the offending content and while simultaneously acknowledging the event.

Brands are vulnerable, increasingly vulnerable as it requires fewer and fewer people to create real and lasting damage. The only defense a brand has is its willingness to live their values and demonstrate them daily at every moment in time, in every place where it comes into contact with the consumer. Consistency, reliability, accountability define a brand. These are the values that must be refined and and continually refined. Public relations, apologies, etc. are today entirely beside the point.
  By pavlizabeth | Minneapolis, MN April 22, 2009 11:46:13 am:
"When you fill the crappiest minimum-wage jobs with adolescents ..." These two employees were in their 30s!
  By DAVID | INDIANAPOLIS, IN April 22, 2009 07:54:25 pm:
What might make more sense is for them to follow the model of fast food joints that prepare food out in the open. White Castle, Subway and Quizno's to name a few. Or install video cameras and feed the images to the ordering area. Tylenol restored trust by sealing the packages. Domino's might have to consider letting customers see inside the kitchen.
  By alexqgb | Orinda, CA April 23, 2009 08:46:50 pm:
The worst thing about the response video was the choice of location. Delivering a message about a front-line problem from a fancy glass office only reinforces the sense of management gone AWOL. And that's what's really at the heart of this mess - the astonishing (and chain-wide?) lack of adult supervision.

The really smart thing would have been getting on a jet (private, of course - this is no time for delays) to film a response video in the exact same kitchen, using the same camera angle. The visual message would be unmistakable - WE'RE ON IT.

The CEO should have posted it to YouTube within 4-5 hours of his seeing the original post. That way, the swift, savvy response would be part of the inevitable news story.

And the message shouldn't simply have been 'they're fired and getting charged'. It should have included 'their manager is fired too'. That would have let the public know that every store manager in the chain is now on notice.

Brutal, yes, but when you're in charge of a multi-million dollar operation, you can't screw around. J&J didn't, which is why Tylenol is still a valuable brand today.
  By MICHAEL | LA GRANGE, IL April 24, 2009 08:39:10 am:
Bob et al:

It's pizza....at a fast food outlet...and 2 idiots posted a video that got its 15 minutes of fame for dumb & dumber...but this overwrought discourse is hysterical.

When will the "experts" get some perspective on all this social media.

In this case, I would have ignored the video and gotten on with running a company.

There are issue(s) to deal with (when it comes to social media) but not now and not with Dominos pizza as the focal point.
  By lavanyaashok | Dubai April 25, 2009 05:26:07 am:
I completely agree with David. I love the concept of transparent kitchens wherein the customers of fast food joints or any restaurant for that matter, are able to witness their food being prepared by their employees. The beauty of Subway is that we can actually see how the Sandwich is being prepared.

The current state that Dominos is in right now, about a billion viewers (most likely much more) would have witnessed the much spoken about video. The best thing that Dominos can do right now is to go in for a kitchen where the customers of Dominos are given access to, and where they can actually witness the preparation of the pizzas etc. This will most likely prevent Dominos from incurring further losses and protect dominos from the permanent tarnish of its image in the market.
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News