November 23, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Garfield's Ad Review

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


How Etsy Made Us Rethink Consumer-Generated Ads

Finalists in Online Craft Community's Contest Have Created Commercials Better -- and More Charming -- Than Many Professional Ads on TV Now

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Uh-oh.

As our worldwide cult of followers is only too well aware, AdReview has just published a book about the digital revolution, death of advertising, collapse of everything we've ever known and loved, blah, blah, blah.

In one of the chapters, titled "Off, Off, Off Madison," we explored the world of Consumer Generated Advertising, which we spent a lot of time watching and thinking about only to come away with a lot of skepticism about the future. For most of its brief history, CGA has consisted of shabbily produced, usually pointless and typically self-referential imitations of the very professional advertising it seeks to replace.

Title: Etsy Handmade Moment
Marketer: Etsy.com
stars
Agency: Etsy's consumers
The results from online crafts marketplace/community Etsy.com's 30-second spot contest are positively remarkable.
In short, it sucks. On pretty much every level. We recommend marketers to embrace CGA not so much for the ads it may yield, but for experience in crowdsourcing, and for the corporate-culture change inherent in re-imagining the relationship between the marketer and the group formerly known as The Customer. Approximately like endlessly repeating "May I have a table by the window" in German is a good way to learn German, not necessarily a template for restaurant seating.

But suddenly we are obliged to reevaluate, thanks to Etsy.com. The online consignment crafts marketplace/community ran a contest seeking 30-second spots from the general Etsy-sphere. The results are positively remarkable. The 10 semi-finalists are as a group better thought-out and realized than any 10 random commercial running on TV anywhere in the world. And a whole lot more charming. As for the three finalists, each is a means of telling the Etsy story in the Etsy-ish of ways.

Handmade ads
The worst of the three is still plenty cute, in a Mr. Bill sort of way. It features four finger puppets doing a tutorial -- in paper-and-aluminum foil-and-claymation -- on how to buy and sell handmade crafts on Etsy.com. Along the way we see animated silk-screening, clay cutting, jewelry soldering, fabric embroidering and step-by-step instructions of how to use the site. "Your place to buy & sell all things handmade," it says, and that pretty much says it all.

Another announces an "Etsy Handmade Moment," and artfully features in the left side of the frame an attractive, hippie-dippy craftswoman by the name of Rebecca. This "ecologicalartist" in a big, floppy straw hat looks fresh and sweet and whole-grained, yet still, you know, pretty hot.

"I've always been into textile design and fashion -- but natural fashion, and ecologically correct fashion," she says. "The natural dyes, the found objects and then my interest in textiles came together and my natural-dye recipes were born. I've always been really fascinated with color and making color from things I can find around me. I'm Rebecca, and [big, toothy grin] I made it!"

WAITING FOR HIS WINGS: The standout ad for Etsy features a sad robot.
WAITING FOR HIS WINGS: The standout ad for Etsy features a sad robot.
Meanwhile, the video is filled with sun-dappled trees, billowing, translucent pastel fabrics, and natural yarns in muted, earthy tones. Lots of subtle lighting, slow pans, satisfying dissolves and revealing depth-of-field adjustments. It looks like it was shot by Pytka, cut by Red Car. It is, in short, gorgeous. But it is not the best.

The best ad comes on the screen as simple animation in the style of 19th-century postcards and/or a magic-lantern show. The central character is a sort of tin-man -- his faced metal-plated like a Russian icon -- consigned, in this narrative, to a life of soul-crushing assembly-line production. But the voice is from an unseen contemporary narrator -- the Etsy craftswoman who has crafted him.

"See, there's a lot of robots out there. A lot of these robots are sad, because they're stuck making these boring, mass-produced things. It's the shackles of robotic slavery. I, I really can believe all that great stuff about how it helps the environment and microeconomics and feeling special about getting something handmade by someone else, but the real reason I make handmade goods is because every time somebody buys something handmade, a robot gets its wings."

Which the animated robot does, flying away to a happier place. It is simply magnificent -- in a way that my book strongly implies CGA will seldom achieve. And in a way that the agency business had better take note of. In fact, here is what they should be saying:

Uh-oh.

27 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: How Etsy Made Us Rethink Consumer-Generated Ads
  By dmhamel1 | Chicago, IL September 21, 2009 08:50:31 am:
Even low-budget, hand-made "ads" can have a huge impact in this world of YouTube. See views of user-generated video for H2O Plus on YouTube:

http://weplayintraffic.com/2009/09/16/consumer-evangelists-to-the-rescue-at-retail/
  By DeadpanWalking | brooklyn, NY September 21, 2009 09:50:50 am:
I think the funniest - and scariest - user-generated ads are the ones where someone is simply posting themselves talking about a horrifying experience they've had with a brand. However, these Etsy ads were great.
  By JeffBach | Stoughton, WI September 21, 2009 09:53:19 am:
I think that all sorts of things have come together to democratize the "production of creativity". These Etsy ads should make it clear, that just about anyone can do good stuff, regardless of equipment, markup and support staff. It used to be that the high brow world of the 3.2x markup (aka agencies) was the main domain for creativity and MORE IMPORTANT the expression of said creativity. A watershed moment has occurred. It probably occurred quite awhile ago, but this Etsy affair is another reminder.

Increasingly, we are seeing the production of creativity EVERYWHERE. This does not bode well for the 3.2x agency world as the keepers of creativity and its production.

In my opinion, the only thing agencies have going for them are the relationships with their existing clients, which is big. The world still mostly operates on relationships. But as those relationships age and expire, the next version of creativity and its production, I think, is going to increasingly be much more wide spread, with the one person shops and smallish low-overhead agencies increasingly making their presence known and making the high overhead traditonal shops increasingly fragile.
  By nashway | Englewood Cliffs, NJ September 21, 2009 09:59:53 am:
Great post, Bob, and thanks for referring me to all this great work. I enjoyed all 10 finalists, and was really impressed with the quality of both the narrative thread of each of these spots as well as the editing.

These offerings were all pretty intense on a visual level, and not because they were shot through a certain lens, or because a post house ran AfterEffects - but because there was a lot of really interesting stuff to look at.

What's most compelling about these submissions is that you KNOW the users who created them (the entire creative & production process: conceived, reflected, scripted, storyboarded, art-directed, shot and edited,) were passionate about every frame. (Let's not be naive - there was motivation there, too...they were all trying to win a contest.) The key is, they were interested in creating something truly reflective of their experience.

This post, and the whole idea of CGA, really sheds light on one of the great paradoxes of advertising: how can someone make a "great" ad if they're NOT actually having the experience? Should all copywriters, art directors, creative directors and everyone in film production have as intimate a connection with the product as we saw in this Etsy case study? It probably wouldn't hurt. And it would likely lead to really great ads coming out of really great shops, unlike, say, DDB Brasil's blunder for WWF. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz0UWnqbcPA

Nader Ashway
Twitter: @nashway
Blog: www.marketingthingy.wordpress.com
  By Steve | Calgary, AB September 21, 2009 10:31:01 am:
The ads are good when you consider they're CGA. When you put them out in the world where stuff is competing for attention, they're above average. The only thing I take issue with is JeffBach's assertion that "These Etsy ads should make it clear, that just about anyone can do good stuff, regardless of equipment, markup and support staff." They don't make that clear at all. The people who created the three finalists are all talented, and have risen above the 99% shite content you find in any creative endeavour.
  By Rust | Cincinnati, OH September 21, 2009 10:31:41 am:
How often is "CGA: merely a euphemism for "unemployed/underemployed writers, production personnel, DP's etc."

Just askin'.
  By RonGould | LOS ANGELES, CA September 21, 2009 10:38:42 am:
It takes a great person to admit when they're wrong. Way to go Bob.

The Etsy contest submissions prove that great creativity can come out of an activated community intent on spreading an authentic message about their passion. The agencies that are willing to participate in a world based in this kind of impassioned trust will prosper. They can only do this by by overcoming the fear of losing their status as the creative elite.

Read more strategies for energizing the community here: http://wholehead.blogspot.com/
  By CDtinsley | miami, FL September 21, 2009 10:44:53 am:
The spots were OK. But the winners of the contest will make less than a PA on a multi day shoot. I guess it's fitting for a site that sells original art for like 12 dollars. Kids, please don't give your stuff away. Some day you may have to leave your parents basement and actually get paid enough to eat something besides cup-o-noodles.
  By JeffBach | Stoughton, WI September 21, 2009 10:48:39 am:
Steve - just curious if you are in an agency?

Nader Ashway's comment makes me wonder if some of these are CGA. They could well be done by someone, for example, in the professional ranks on their own time, whose husband/wife/GF/BF is an Etsy artist. They could even be free work done by an agency to win the contest.

I can't argue too much with Steve. He is right most UGC/CGA work is not good enough.

My point though, is that IF the Etsy contest entries are CGA, I think they all show that the spectrum of people capable of doing "good enough" work is widening. Even if I am only partially correct, a widening spectrum of talent outside the bounds of an agency model is going to make agency life more and more difficult.

I continue to think that the relationships and networks owned by the BD people within an agency are increasingly their most valuable asset. The talent has escaped and/or is emerging elsewhere.
  By Kevin | New York, NY September 21, 2009 10:55:05 am:
Sort of ironic these were traditional 30-second spots. What was the title of your book again Bob?

Anyway, do you think any of these 10 finalists could do the heavy lifting of successful multi-channel branding over 5 years or so? Or are we simply talking about the fireworks factor - you know, "oooooh" "aaaahhhhhhh."
  By Steve | Calgary, AB September 21, 2009 11:17:30 am:
Yep, JeffBach, I'm agency side. But in a shop that can see the merits of CGA as a way of involving brand evangelists. My point was actually in defense of the finalists. Their work just isn't indicative of typical CGA. It's much better. So I didn't think it proved "anyone" can create good content. If anything, good consumer generated content might provide a lesson that's oft overlooked by clients: give creative people freedom, and you'll be surprised at the solutions they bring - whether they live in an agency or in a duplex.
  By SkadaddleMedia | Sausalito, CA September 21, 2009 11:24:10 am:
Why is this even surprising?

Doesn't it stand to reason that CG content/advertising will be better when it's promoting a vertical filled with highly passionate people/users (versus say generic snack foods)? These people understand the experience better than most (and probably WAY more than any agency). Beyond that, the "agency is dead" angle, though, is really boring. Is it all changing? Sure. So what? Move along...nothing to see here.

Todd Lieman
Founder/Co-President
Skadaddle Media
@skadaddlemedia
  By steve | ny, NY September 21, 2009 11:25:55 am:
The Etsy.tv contest is remarkable in many ways - fueled by the passion and creativity of their community. But it's also a glimpse into a powerful trend and could impact many brands - leveraging the 'special sauce' of their brand community to amplify both the message of the brand and knowledge that exists within the brands community. For example, the specialty insurance company Hagerty uses consumer video to embrace their classic car collectors here: http://video.hagerty.com and Zappos uses UGC to power their video channel here: http://zappos.tv/

My point is that different brands and different communities will leverage their customers skills in different way - but to not engage users and invite them to be creators for your brand is missing a powerful new tool in the marketing toolbox.

(magnify.net powers the Etsy.tv site)
  By rrrandr | New York, NY September 21, 2009 12:04:47 pm:
As good as these ads may be, they're all one-offs. There is no way to use crowdsourcing to build a brand. The results are too random. I'd like to see how crowdsourcing would turn these ads into campaigns, complete with interactive, experiential, print, etc. Unless the creator of the winning spot becomes the CD all you have is one nice ad, whereas the job of the agency (and what will keep ad agencies relevant for decades to come) is creating a brand - something much much bigger.
  By rrrandr | New York, NY September 21, 2009 12:08:06 pm:
To continue with an analogy - anyone off the street can sink a basket, but few can lead a team and get it to the playoffs.
  By jess176 | Portland, OR September 21, 2009 12:49:01 pm:
UGC is at its best when the people generating the ads are passionate about the brand and what it's selling- as they clearly are in this case.

Unfortunately, too much UGC is a result of aspiring (or failed) ad people and film makers trying to land some visibility.
  By HEATHER | SANTA MONICA, CA September 21, 2009 01:28:49 pm:
If the crowd-sourcing contest campaign is asking for creativity then it works best when you the social networking site being used is a site based on creativity such as an Etsy or deviantART. Look at the contest deviantART did for the Tim Burton movie "9." The submissions are amazing:
http://news.deviantart.com/article/91399/

Browse deviations:
http://browse.deviantart.com/?catpath=contests/2009/creaturecontest
  By TimGeo | New York, NY September 21, 2009 01:45:32 pm:
Great stuff and one of the the few times I've seen crowdsourced creative work well.

Here are 2 reason why I see it's working well for them:

1. Love. Etsy's fan base is extremely devoted. For brands that inspire passion, and consist of a very creative fan base, you'll get entries that amaze, for not much financial reward. For toilet paper and potato chips, not so much.

2. All creative entries can be SEEN.

This is important. Extremely important. It's perhaps the most important drivers for any creative person. Making something that has a chance to be seen is what drives many creative people. Since this competition is open and allows freedom of creativity,people are drawn to enter it. If only the top-voted entry were seen, it would be very different.

Unfortunately, not all clients are willing to be so open. 99.9 % of the time, the ideas creatives in ad agencies/production companies/ directors/etc come up with also never gets seen. And that's what those creative people are paid for; constant, quality creative in the face of rejection and anonymity.
  By Maya | Vancouver, BC September 21, 2009 01:48:04 pm:
Before we panic, I think we are forgetting that the etsy audience is not your typical novice. These are artists with experience in design, colour, multi-media. They know their audience. And may have art school or marketing training. I think sometimes we hear "crafter" and think "female" and "just for fun".
  By janmaclatchie | New York, NY September 21, 2009 02:10:26 pm:
Clever, clever Etsy handcraft community. These are not your typical CGA makers. These, I suspect, are a bunch of RISD and Pratt and SCAD alums who probably could be (or maybe are) working at agencies or as industrial designers but are also supplementing their income or making a living through handcraft. So as a marketer I'm not worried, I'm cheering! I want every robot on the planet to get its wings, and I want to hire that filmmaker to make my clients' next online videos. I love how she breaks character in the v/o right at the end and laughs a little, not taking it too seriously. It is the perfect nuance, and the look of it is just spot-on. Handmade but with and edge, not crafty-cute. Referential to another time but not another yawn/yuck mid-century reference. This is the level of work that will encourage handcarft in America. Cheers to Etsy, and the winged robots.
  By amkovacs | Chicago, IL September 22, 2009 11:10:34 am:
(BTW, to JeffBach: it states in the contest rules that "If you or your friend are employed professionally in the advertising industry, you are ineligible to participate")

I am finding this conversation interesting where I am observing that the staunch agency types deride the creativity of the Etsy ad spots under statement that one-ad-spot-does-not-a-brand-make. Of course not, for traditional CPGs that is. Here, we are talking about a handmade "movement" that comes in all shapes, sizes and colors. It likely won't be contained in a neat little cohesive, organized and consistent branding campaign. Etsy has an ardent loyal following that most CPGs can only dream of. The only consistency required here is etsy.com + handmade.

On my end, I am delighting in the creative and varied execution of these ad spots. Just as the Etsy artisans and designers are making inroads to compete with big box retailers and made-in-China-generic goods, it's fun to observe in parallel that now, their creative flair is also now being felt by "big box" advertising agencies. Way to go indie!
  By TimGeo | New York, NY September 22, 2009 01:35:18 pm:
Not true, amkovacs. You may want to re-read my previously response. Rather than 'de-ride' (where did you read that?), every creative I've talked to thinks the entries, for the most part, are actually pretty good.

Rarely is such unbridled creative freedom allowed (or, for that matter, as warranted as it is here in Etsy's case).

If you are a client, remember that the 'creative flair' you're seeing here is what you rarely see when month-long assignments have been culled down to the 1-2 campaigns you are presented with to answer those multi-point briefs. Many times, the 'creative flair' ends up on the creative floor.

Come by some time and have a look.
  By amkovacs | Chicago, IL September 22, 2009 01:41:57 pm:
@TimGeo: agreed. Which is why Etsy has a totally unfair advantage here, not having to endure client censorship. Unbridled indeed, in every aspect.Lucky them.
  By DAVID | SOUTHFIELD, MI September 24, 2009 12:23:10 pm:
(BTW, to JeffBach: it states in the contest rules that "If you or your friend are employed professionally in the advertising industry, you are ineligible to participate")

Yes, and we know from recent experience that agency folks always STRICTLY observe contest rules.
  By theotherbobg | austin, TX September 24, 2009 03:52:01 pm:
The girl in the floppy hat is "pretty hot?"

1) Beside the point
2) Wrong

Your reputation is intact.
@theotherbobg

besides the point??????

1) yeah, nobody ever is put in an ad because of their good lucks. i totally apologize for even suggesting that.

2) that's obnoxious.
  By theotherbobg | austin, TX September 25, 2009 05:12:32 pm:
further proof that critics have the thinnest skins of all.
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News