November 21, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Building a Generous Brand

Why Brands Should Add Value to Consumers' Lives

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

John King
John King

Brands have evolved past the baseline of trust and awareness; now they must learn how to give, says John King, director of brand innovation for Fallon. Here's how.

A planner friend of mine had this great line about a year ago: "I'm so over messages," she said. Aren't we all; aren't we all.

As the industry continues to plod away from messages, ads and interruptions and move toward ideas, involvement and experiences, Fallon has committed to a modern branding approach called "generosity." We believe the future belongs to generous brands. Generous brands are additive to people's lives and to culture. They help build ideas in the world; they leave something behind.

Generosity is about providing value in the life of the consumer: entertainment value, social value and belief value. Generosity isn't a new idea. In fact, it's a really, really old idea. Gift theory was the reason ancient kings used to bestow gifts on the people. The rule of reciprocity held true then just as much as it does today. Generosity makes the gift giver look royal and as important, the people who received the gift feel obligated to repay what another provided.

We've found generosity works just as well on the street as in the castle. In some ways, all brands are standing on the corner begging for attention. There are two ways to do it: You can focus on the old model and fill your cardboard sign with a supply-side sob story ("Broke, out-of-work veteran"). Or you can take a more generous approach: singing a song, making people smile or opening a door. Brands must learn that empty pockets will never earn as much as the empty guitar case. Until brands push past rational selling and start more consistently providing people with ideas, emotions and actions, they should expect the consumer to avoid eye contact and walk right by.

Make no mistake, generosity isn't charity or cause marketing. While the recent economic woes have made mercy marketing the norm, with Hyundai's brilliant assurance idea leading the way, generosity is broader in concept. Sometimes, it's about entertainment value. Cadbury's decision to put joy into the world in the form of a gorilla and a Phil Collins song -- instead of ramming joy into another chocolate ad -- is generous. Alpo's decision to start a movement to restore "dogness" to dogs was a way to connect with common-sense dog owners who shared the belief value that "dogs should be dogs." And General Mills' decision to place Box Tops for Education on all its products (and the products of its competitors, by the way) provides social value.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
John King is director of brand innovation for Fallon.

Branding has evolved past the baseline of trust and awareness. It's not enough to get people to say or think, "I know you, so I'll buy from you." Modern branding is about actually letting the audience share ownership of your brand, and generosity is the path that gets you there. Google, Red Bull and Obama have already learned your brand reaches the highest speeds when you give your audience the keys. Like the king in the castle and the beggar on the street, it's time brands start to learn to give as much as they take.

Five Tips for Building a More Generous Brand

1. Oh, behave!
Today, even the brand that finds itself in the sacred top-right quadrant of the account-planner-positioning chart may find itself sitting in a silk-lined rut. To be successful today requires pushing past positioning toward behavior. Generous brands behave; they do things for people. It's not enough today to know what celebrity your brand would be at the party; instead, we should be asking ourselves what we want our brand legacy to be. What would our brand do if diagnosed with just one year to live? The first step toward being a generous brand is to carefully define the idea we're trying to build in the world, then determine the actions we must take to get there. And that means change for us. Brand behavior requires creative people who can build ideas with broad shoulders; account and connection planners determined to reveal human truth; media people who want to make things more than they want to buy things; and account people who believe the product of an agency is far more than just advertising.

2. Uncover the value equation
Like any branding approach, it all starts with audience. There's a reason "It's the thought that counts" is the golden rule of gift giving. Getting to the thought -- and ultimately a more generous approach -- requires a brand to get out there and make time to understand what its audience wants from it. While this may sound daunting, consider a simple research exercise we often use called "Ask/Thank." When interviewing consumers, we've found it helpful to start by having them ask the brand for three things and thank the brand for three things. We've found their answers provide an excellent glimpse into the existing value equation for the brands we work on.

3. Get on their schedule
Marketers are used to schedules. We have too many, but the real problem is that our schedules and calendars are built around business, brand and category norms, not around how the consumer is living his or her life. It's only going to become more difficult for brands to fit consumers onto their marketing schedule. Instead, brands should try a more generous approach, taking the time to know and understand what's going on in the audience's lives while determining the best way to fit. Brands today should take cues from Google's ever-changing home page, asking how they can participate on St. Patrick's Day or Election Day instead of brainstorming ideas to "Drive sales in Q3!" -- a concept that has no relevance on the consumer calendar.

4. Slippy digital
If the microsite isn't dead, it just drove away on a crotch rocket wearing a windbreaker and no helmet. Digital is no longer about investing in sticky online real estate and expecting the audience to come to us. Brands today need to move away from building the big online house with curb appeal. A generous approach to digital has more parallels with putting a piece of old furniture in your front yard with a "free" sign on it. The most impactful digital experiences today are designed to create portable, slippy content that allows people to take your brand places. A great piece of film that can be added to people's social sites and played on any number of screens will be far more effective than building an online destination. Generous brands go where the people are online, not the other way around.

5. Take a bigger role
Every brand has a choice: Be stingy or be generous. A stingy brand chooses to focus entirely on product information, asking the consumer to walk up and knock on its door. A generous brand chooses to take a bigger role in the consumer's life, opening the doors and windows and providing shared ownership. It wasn't that long ago that the business of advertising was to create ideas about brands. For a car company, that meant you were limited to selling things like "fastest," "safest" or "cheapest." Brands today have permission -- if not an obligation -- to take a bigger role and start seeing those lines on the flow chart not as spots and dots of message delivery but as the building blocks of an idea in the world. The generous brand has a much bigger cupboard to draw from. We're now in the business of building brands about ideas. And that means a car company can sell fun, a soda company can bottle optimism and a chocolate company can make joy. For us, it means advertising just might be able to change the world.

18 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Building a Generous Brand
  By marcwhitehead | toronto, ON May 6, 2009 08:18:47 am:
Nice piece John. It echoes the idea that brands have a social purpose as much as a business purpose, and that generosity is a great place to start telling that part of their story. Of course, the brand's generosity needs to be authentic, rooted in actions and not just marketing hyperbole.
  By Tracey Beeker | KANSAS CITY, MO May 6, 2009 09:25:14 am:
Great selection, John! Consumers want to be co-authors of brands today. If we let them, fulfilling a social purpose will be an imperative for continued engagement.
  By Kirkistan | Saint Paul, MN May 6, 2009 09:34:27 am:
Thanks for writing this piece and I could not agree more. I was particularly taken with the notion of gift theory. What's true on a personal level is becoming true on a corporate level: sharing ourselves with others as a first priority—as a gift—has a humanizing effect and may actually be good for business. Although quantifying that good in a formula remains murky.
  By robgeno | NEW YORK, NY May 6, 2009 09:37:18 am:
So appropriate, thank you for this. Ask/ Thank is a great brand exercise.
  By vjmcaneney | Paoli, PA May 6, 2009 09:42:27 am:
Couldn't agree more - People want something more, and are willing to pay for it. It is that 'feel good', that something more that consumers want to latch on to. We've actually started marketing our brand (a female race car driver fighting the odds/chasing her dream) as something that gives back by providing an inspiration to all women - and that other brands can capitalize on what she is giving back.
http://www.alliowens.com/believe/video_test.swf
  By patrick | Minneapolis, MN May 6, 2009 10:07:20 am:
I think generosity is an opportunity for some brands, others not so much. For example, in the B2B space, which is often ignored, but actually a massive marketing channel, this generosity theory would only partly apply - particularly the online components. Having stated my critique, I found this piece very refreshing, important and something I will give serious thought to.
  By scottkarambis | New York, NY May 6, 2009 11:02:55 am:
Nicely done. I admit I began reading as a skeptic. There are a lot of Utopian claims being made about brands right now which seem to forget that we are still in business, and need to make money. But my skepticism was dispelled when you quickly grounded the concept of "generosity" in specifics, by distinguishing it from cause marketing and suggesting a model for consumer motivation that would benefit the brand (I agree with Kirkastan above: I hope you are during more with gift/exchange theory--Lewis Hyde's book immediately came to mind) My only quibbles: I know it's handy for a column to pivot off past excesses, but do we have to trash "messaging" every time we talk about a new brand model? I work on a number of businesses that are very responsive to TV, responsive on many levels: sales, consumer engagement, etc. Are people really that tired of filmed stories? In fact, I'd argue that your try to recuperate "messaging" in a back-door way by suggesting that "entertainment" is another kind of gift. Hmmm. Maybe. But minor points. Lots of strong ideas, deftly presented. Thanks.
  By Danielle | Santa Barbara, CA May 6, 2009 11:59:56 am:
I love this article! A successful example of this is Tom's shoes. Their partnership with AT&T has given them a larger outlet to showcase generosity, while also allowing their target market to personally contribute to the bigger picture. Founder Blake Mycoskie has taken numerous steps to get his small brand out there, but I think consumers are effectively able to connect with the idea that their purchase will have a direct impact; It will allow Tom's (and the consumer) to give a pair of shoes to someone else in need. I think he's onto something...
  By Kevin | New York, NY May 6, 2009 12:52:21 pm:
A gorilla in a TV spot is "generosity" ??? I thought we called that "breaking thru the clutter."

Ad industry = same sh*t, different year.
  By atwright | VANCOUVER, WA May 6, 2009 12:57:07 pm:
Building a generous brand can also include leveraging the power of a strong internal culture that will support your brand. If your employees aren't walking the walk behind your brand promise, then you're not creating a solid foundation for your brand to be built upon. Find ways to build that generosity from within so that your employees will then reflect that out to your customers.
  By marasong | Century City, CA May 6, 2009 01:32:06 pm:
This is FANTASTIC!! Talk about cutting through the clutter. Using your brand to put something positive into the world will always pay off in the end. It's nice to see the Ad Age brand doing the same with this article. I'll be forwarding it to my clients and agencies who build brands to let them know how important THEIR decisions are to the world of consumers.

Thank you John, and thank you Ad Age!
  By savagedan | New York, NY May 6, 2009 03:40:00 pm:
Blah, blah, blah...

More agency speak.

All the agency boys finally caught on to "trust," so now they pick a new word.

Stay tuned next week: Brian will be writing in this space about "Spiritual" brands.
  By paynetaylor | ANDOVER, MA May 6, 2009 04:24:16 pm:
Generosity is a sweet and lovely buzzword which has all the humanist values and sensibility once exclusively claimed by the crunchy granola crowd. And, of course, it's hard for anyone to be against "providing value in the life of the consumer."

But let's be honest, here. A message by any other name is still a message. It may be gussied up in the guise of a "good" message as adverse to a "bad" one, but the obvious relativity of that proposition is certainly open to discussion and debate.

Giving shoes to those in need is, in itself a "good" thing, but like Bono championing the plethora of causes he does, it is, indeed, a means to an end. If the "good" Tom's message fails to sell shoes, Tom's will no longer be "good," just bankrupt.

With that as a paradigm, Marie Antoinette's "let them eat cake," might be seen as roughly analagous to the General Mills decision to place Box Tops for Education on all its products in order to provide social value -- kind of a "let them eat education" corollary.

In any event, John does get it exactly right when he says that generosity makes the gift giver look royal and important and the people who received the gift feel obligated to repay what that gift-giver has provided. The problem with that rationale, however is that it's underscored by an almost malignant reciprocity which, back in the day, was simply called "making someone feel guilty."

Guilt is a very powerful means of human motivation, often far more potent than simple avarice. As such, it is a very valuable marketing tool, especially when institutionalized by such aphoristic do-goodisms as "Ask/Thank" (though "Cadbury's decision to put joy into the world in the form of a gorilla and a Phil Collins song" does strain the bounds of rational credibility).

So, let's not fool ourselves. Saying that car companies heretofore limited to selling things like "fastest," "safest" or "cheapest" should now "take a bigger role and start seeing those lines on the flow chart not as spots and dots of message delivery but as the building blocks of an idea in the world," is just another wolf wrapped in sheep's clothing. Ultimately, the building blocks of the "idea in the world" marketeers want to communicate are ... "fastest," "safest" and "cheapest."

I mean, what's the alternative? A brand suddenly turning "generous" doesn't mean the brand's messaging is somehow going to be turned upside down and into "slowest," "most dangerous," "most expensive."

Thus, the only real difference between a "generous" and traditional brand is that the buying motivation for the so-called "stingy" one is at least honest -- what it can do for you. Guilting a customer into feeling an obligation to buy based on how nice the seller is doesn't make a brand any better or more "generous," just more inherently dishonest.

Christopher Payne-Taylor | Andover, MA
  By Robert A. B. | New York, NY May 6, 2009 05:08:38 pm:
Generosity is a lovely idea and one best expressed as a function of gratitude, as in a company demonstrates gratitude toward its employees, its vendors, its community and ultimately to its customers. Generosity has always been central to any successful brand and has always played a prominent part in any good ad campaign. What has changed is the current perception of generosity.

That Fallon has decided to commodify the notion is not merely ironic, it's evidence that the agency has finally become conscious of the fact that consumers are conscious of the fact that advertisers are always trying to sell them something, whether that something is chocolate or dog food or "green" choices. Fallon's action, at its heart, is an attempt to claim its work originates from their awareness of consumers' growing self awareness that they are consumers. And, that as consumers they are required to act as passive receivers of an advertiser's message. Rather they can choose to be persuaded or remain unconvinced.

In the end, it seems to me that John King has created an elaborate justification or job description for the title, Director of Brand Innovation. The ideas are old ideas that go back further in time than generic "ancient kings." (Who by the why always enjoyed more of everything than the beggars—we're not talking about an equitable distribution of wealth here, which is why it's a poor metaphor.)

John, if you really want to think deeply, why not go all the way back to God, Abraham, Isaac and the covenant? The complexity there. apropos of generosity, producers and consumers is more relevant to serving consumers today.
  By stephenpbyrne | Australia May 6, 2009 06:59:39 pm:
I really can't see any difference between this argument and what Kevin Robert's at Saatchi has been saying for a long time on the Lovemarks site. They're both the same argument and, for the most part, GOOD brands are already doing this..which is why they are good. I get tired of hearing from ad agencies with supposedly new takes on brand strategy. For the most part, this kind of brand evangelism no more credibile than Rhonda Byrne's The Secret, which also encourages "generosity", "thanks" and "acknowledgement". Stephen Byrne DIFFUSIONblog.blospot.com
  By TyTellis | Karachi May 7, 2009 05:40:54 am:
Hi,

I think generosity is not the next level, brands and their custodians have to really move from the brand centric to the consumer centric universe. Only and only when they truly care for consumers will they be generous etc.

Trust is overused but not overrated trust is important today, but so is space and time one way of adding value to the consumers life get out and give them time to themselves. Perhaps people want privacy rather than anything else.

Genuine concern would beat generosity anyday.

Tyrone, Pakistan
  By paynetaylor | ANDOVER, MA May 13, 2009 08:49:49 pm:
Oh, come on. Customer-centric universe? Brands make things, customers buy them. It's a simple, symbotic relationship. Brands are not there to care for their customers, unless they are a nursing home catering to the aged and infirm. And even then, it's a service for which their "customers" pay dearly.

But you are right, Tyrone. Genuine concern beats generosity because at least it's an honest response. Generosity tends to make givers feel superior and receivers guilty. Genuine concern, on the other hand, can be freely given and taken without cost to either party.

Privacy, though, may be too high an ambition for us plebian marketeers. If we don't intrude on someone's personal space, how can we put up a billboard or blog or television advertisement or in-store giveaway? How can we sell them what they don't know they don't need? Trust may be overused and/or overated and/or both, but trust me, privacy is where generosity stops. No one in any universe can afford it.

Christopher Payne-Taylor | Andover, MA
  By promotion123 | Arana HIills September 23, 2009 06:54:31 am:
Certainly a different way to look at the whole brand concept. Great detail and great insight into how it should work or could work for those that want to get in the game!
Thanks
Douglas Gregory
http://www.promotionproducts.com.au
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News