Ignore the Research and Trust Your Gut
Euro's David Jones Tells Idea Conference to Take Back Creativity From Consumers
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Relying on a "Dilbert" cartoon to soften the blow of an at times harsh condemnations of ad industry practices, David Jones, CEO of global agency network Euro RSCG Worldwide,
|
David Jones is not a fan of consumer-produced commercials and believes the ad industry must continue to lead the way in defining marketing's big ideas. Videography: Steve Raddock |
As one of the ad industry's next-generation leaders, Mr. Jones dissed consumer-generated content and the research industry while exhorting a standing-room only audience at today's "Idea Conference: Redefining Creativity" to think of themselves not as makers of ads but as creators of short-form content. He said the industry needs to show how powerful creativity can be.
The Idea Conference was hosted by Advertising Age and sibling Creativity magazine.
Not a shy guy
After teasing a smattering of laughs by showing a "Dilbert" cartoon in which a character describes his day at the office ("As usual I worked 'til midnight, worsening a presentation for a meeting that won't happen for a project that doesn't exist"), Mr. Jones, who is not shy about speaking up, laid out his thoughts on how to move the industry forward. His talk focused on four recommendations.
His first piece of advice: Stop worrying about the 30-second TV commercial. The death of the TV ad is highly overrated, he maintained, and "to talk about it is to miss the point. Our industry is the best in the world at short-form content. We should think of ourselves as creators of short-form content, not 30-second ads."
Admitting to a bit of shameless promotion for his agency, he showed "Waterboy," an animated commercial that runs for more than two minutes, created and produced by Euro's Paris office. "'Waterboy' took on a life of its own" after it was aired, said Mr. Jones. The ad's soundtrack, which featured a cover of Queen's rock anthem "We Will Rock You" sung by a French schoolboy, was a spectacular success in France, where it was released as an album. The album went gold and the single reached platinum.
He then criticized a popular trend in advertising today: the use consumer-generated content. "We've got to stop thinking that consumer-generated content is an idea," he said. "It isn't. It is a phenomenon." The problem with relying on communications created by regular Joes, he said, is that they "rarely create content with your brand strategy in their pocket."
Consumer-generated 'crap'
While admitting that some of what's posted on sites such as YouTube and Heavy.com is good, he called most of it "crap" and added that brands for the most part are not welcome on those sites. The exception, he said, is "if you post brilliant ideas, you'll get attention. The brand then gets control." To show how that can happen -- in another promotional push for Euro -- he offered up consumer takeoffs posted on YouTube of an ad, called "Dancer" and created by Euro RSCG London, in which a Citroen C4 grooves in a parking lot. "Our industry cannot delegate the creation of brilliant ideas to consumers. We have to be at the starting point," he said. "Consumers can take off from there."
Taking a "swipe at the research and pre-testing industry," Mr. Jones next exhorted listeners to stop asking permission. Drawing on a "truth" from British comedian Vic Reeves that "96.2% of all statistics are made up," Mr. Jones -- also a Brit -- argued that some of the most well-liked ads aren't based on research or focus-group results. Instead they but rely on a creative director's gut instinct of what consumers will like. He cited Procter & Gamble's effort for Charmin toilet tissue created by Euro rival Publicis Worldwide that riffs off of the many euphemisms for elimination. "Publicis took a risk, and did it without a bit of research," he said.
And by way of reinforcing the previous point, his last bit of advice was for creatives to "trust your gut." Advertising is changing fast, and to not take a risk is risky -- even though it's scary to take a risk. Risk-takers who've won big, according to Mr. Jones, are Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and director David Fincher ("Fight Club," "Seven").
Really redefining creativity
He suggested changing the current format of Advertising Week, the weeklong boozy schmoozefest where industry insiders host seminars and events attended by more industry insiders, to focus instead on having the industry collaborate to solve big issues. "Others are doing it," he said, citing ProjectRed, an effort spearheaded by Bono and Bobby Shriver that brings together brands including Gap, Converse, Motorola and Apple to fight AIDS in Africa. "If we really want to redefine creativity, let's do something good with it, and use it to tackle some big issues."














At best, with respect to the creative process, research can only attempt to link the creative output to the strategic intent. Does the ad meet our strategy and do consumers "get it".
Arthur Shapiro
arthur@amshapiro.com
You are not very smart. If you were smart, you would figure out that Insights can be a tremendous weapon in the creative process. The key here is "insights".
If you were smart, you would employ Insights professionals and techniques which enhance the process, the strategy, and the effectiveness of advertising today.
For Mr. Jones and all who agree with his views on "research", there are two MAJOR problems with Insights today: 1) Insights isn't a commodity--many of you are not finding value because you are not utilizing talented individuals in this area. It's a huge problem. Most of the insights work being done today is flawed in approach and execution. 2) Insights is often not employed at the right times, or in the appropriate manner, as in before and during the creative process.
In my opinion, TV and radio creative today is the worst I've ever seen. Maybe it's because of poor insights work; maybe because of poor creative work. Whatever the cause, there's a significant misconception today that advertising is primarily an entertainment exercise. Well it certainly is for those who are too lazy to actually define a unique positioning for their products and brands.
The idea that there are no product differences--that everything is commodity, and that emotion and brand lovemarks and entertainment is where we need to focus--(are forced to focus)--is crap. The truth? Let's tell the truth. Creating and maintaining a unique positioning, and delivering WOW! goods and service experiences, takes a lot of work and commitment. What I see today is a lack of continuous provement for quality. Without a commitment to quality, entertainment and emotion is all that a brand offers. What a shallow bond for the consumer. Sure it can work, but it's a constant battle--kind of like putting lipstick on a pig.
By the way, "research" is technically something you do afterwards.
Sincerely,
Daniel Tutle
Insights & Innovation
dtut@sbcglobal.net
I'm fairly certain - that his thoughts are a trumpeting of others... his own ideas may have made their way into a sentence or two - but talking about stopping the talk and doing isn't demonstrative of getting it done... I have a friend who reached a similar threshold several years ago - then he did something about it... check out markfiore.com for his "VOICE"...
Doers do.
(I could also be a little bitter about not being able to make it to the booze fest...)
And talk about research — what better way to better understand your consumer than to watch them express themselves via your own brand values? I think Mr. Jones should be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater, just because some of his clients abuse the services research can render. Instead, he should take a step back and see that the two subjects he's admonishing (and abolishing) will be shaping our business going forward. I think consumer-driven media and research will become one in the same.
Just thinking outloud,
Suzy Badaracco
Culinary Tides
www.culinarytides.com