<rss version="2.0"
					xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
					xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
					xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/"
					xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
				  >
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/verdict-brands-peoplebrowsr-twitter/238564/#comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><title><![CDATA[Comments on: The Verdict for Brands in PeopleBrowsr vs. Twitter]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/verdict-brands-peoplebrowsr-twitter/238564/#comments</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>120</ttl>
<description><![CDATA[Twitter has spent this year evolving from an open platform to one that is sealed off and tightly controlled.]]></description>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: BL OCHMAN]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/verdict-brands-peoplebrowsr-twitter/238564/#comments-106851</link>
<description><![CDATA[Well said David. I&#039;ve been saying for a long time that companies whose business is built on the Twitter API have no future unless they diversify quickly. 

Hoping that yours is the one company Google or Twitter or Facebook will bring in-house is a one in a million shot. 

Being dependent on one company - especially one that is constantly evolving to keep a step ahead of the herd - is just plain dangerous.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:30 EST</pubDate>
<author>BL OCHMAN</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>