<rss version="2.0"
					xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
					xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
					xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/"
					xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
				  >
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/a-buzzfed-gawkerized-world-image-good/238672/#comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><title><![CDATA[Comments on: In a BuzzFed, Gawkerized World, Photos of Naked Celebs and Barnyard Animals Are Interchangeable]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/a-buzzfed-gawkerized-world-image-good/238672/#comments</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>120</ttl>
<description><![CDATA[If the print-media universe continues to contract, who is going to finance the creation of the defining photography of our time? Today, many of the photographers who matter most are financed by glossies.]]></description>
</channel>
</rss>