<rss version="2.0"
					xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
					xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
					xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/"
					xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
				  >
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://adage.com/article/digital/eyes-manti-te-o-hoax-story-deadspin-immediately-cash/239270/#comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><title><![CDATA[Comments on: With All Eyes on Manti Te'o Hoax Story, Deadspin Doesn't Immediately Cash In]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/digital/eyes-manti-te-o-hoax-story-deadspin-immediately-cash/239270/#comments</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>120</ttl>
<description><![CDATA[Deadspin's blockbuster article eclipsed 3.5 million views Thursday evening. But at least in the short term, Gawker Media is not cashing in on all those eyeballs.]]></description>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: ]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/digital/eyes-manti-te-o-hoax-story-deadspin-immediately-cash/239270/#comments-107586</link>
<description><![CDATA[3.5 million views. It sure sounds like a lot but it isn&#039;t when compared to their total traffic and the universe of their audience which is national, if not global, and overwhelmingly Men 18-34 (might index a tad bit older). An attractive audience to some buyers but I don&#039;t see too many of them chasing speculative spikes on a national scale. Especially when it is not that large.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:42 EST</pubDate>
<author></author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>