<rss version="2.0"
					xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
					xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
					xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/"
					xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
				  >
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/future-pregnant-celebrity-industrial-complex/239836/#comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><title><![CDATA[Comments on: The Future of the Pregnant-Celebrity-Industrial Complex]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/future-pregnant-celebrity-industrial-complex/239836/#comments</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>120</ttl>
<description><![CDATA[The celebrity weeklies, for instance, would be nowhere without baby bumps. I was gripped with that realization recently while doing one of my periodic print-media purges.]]></description>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: ]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/future-pregnant-celebrity-industrial-complex/239836/#comments-108322</link>
<description><![CDATA[Simon, if you&#039;re actually being critical of how trivial the media has become about celebrity lives, I salute you. Personally, I enjoy every attempt to close off the ever-present media spotlight on the private lives of the rich, famous, celebrity, political leaders, etc. Any journalist involved in sensationalizing gossip, which is what it is, should find another line of work. It is pursuing the meaningless.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47 EST</pubDate>
<author></author>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: ]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/future-pregnant-celebrity-industrial-complex/239836/#comments-108277</link>
<description><![CDATA[lolz........ www.lifeofjesusbracelet.com]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:46 EST</pubDate>
<author></author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>