<rss version="2.0"
					xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
					xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
					xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/"
					xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
				  >
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://adage.com/article/media/h2-network-a-hit-men-advertisers/239859/#comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><title><![CDATA[Comments on: H2 Network Is a Hit With Men, Advertisers]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/media/h2-network-a-hit-men-advertisers/239859/#comments</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>120</ttl>
<description><![CDATA[Channel that's actually about history furthers net's plan to become male megabrand.]]></description>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: ]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/media/h2-network-a-hit-men-advertisers/239859/#comments-108320</link>
<description><![CDATA[And how long will it be before &quot;Reality&quot; programming will infest this channel, then we&#039;ll see a &quot;H3&quot; Channel, (which will naturally be in a higher tier, forcing you to pay more money and receive a bunch of channels you never watch). I see through this thing, its called corporate greed.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:45 EST</pubDate>
<author></author>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: ]]></title>
<link>http://adage.com/article/media/h2-network-a-hit-men-advertisers/239859/#comments-108305</link>
<description><![CDATA[Does this remind anybody else of the time MTV had to create a new channel just to show... music videos? Hmm.

I have seen these demographics in action; my policeman uncle is glued to the History Channel, as are several of his colleagues.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:56 EST</pubDate>
<author></author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>