November 26, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Understanding the 1% Who Influence the Rest of Us

Why Small Agencies Need to Embrace Social Media

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba are marketing consultants in Chicago who have interesting theories about citizen marketing. A recent observation on their website creatingcustomerevangelists.com, caught my eye
Bart Cleveland Bart Cleveland
because what I read underscores how my agency has been attempting to reach consumers more effectively. According to McConnell and Huba, it's just one percent of the people who visit "democratized sites," such as WikiPedia that create those sites' content. McConnell and Huba conclude that this tiny percentage has a huge opportunity to influence consumers. There are those who disagree but it makes sense to me. If history teaches us anything it is that only a relative few influence culture. We like to think of ourselves as individuals, but it's a delusion for most.

Another blogger, Sean Moffitt, chimed in on McConnell and Huba's blog with the thought that the one percent rule uses facts and figures that we marketers are probably more familiar with and yet still tend to ignore when devising marketing plans.

If you follow the logic flow of these facts and figures it's apparent that word-of-mouth has more power to effectively communicate a brand's story than ever before. This shouldn't worry marketers or agencies it should excite us because we give people the words.

But are small agencies keeping the pace in this ongoing communications revolution? Many times the nimbleness of being a small agency allows us to be innovators, but I admit that our agency has not been utilizing the power of the individual as much as we could have. We are making strides in the right direction and our clients are pleased with our efforts, but I wish we were farther along in our experience.

We are still exploring how to use the tools and culture that the Internet has created. That's why it's an exciting time to be in this business. To embrace this latest evolutionary jump means being a part of a new day in advertising. We have been given the opportunity to invent new ways of connecting brands with consumers.

According to creatingcustomerevangelists.com, a few reasons why social media is important to marketers are these:
  • By March 2006, 84 million Americans had broadband at home, a 40% jump from 2005 figures
  • By March 2006, Pew estimated 48 million Americans were regular online content creators
  • By the end of 2005, 139 million people in the world had a DSL (broadband) connection
  • In 2005, $6.7 billion worth of digital cameras were sold in the U.S.
  • About 41% of all cell phone owners use them as content tools
  • By the end of 2005, just over 1 billion people were online -- that's 1/6th of the world
  • Asia represents the world's most populous online segment
  • By July 2006, 50 million blogs had been created and their number was doubling every 6 months
  • About 7,200 new blogs are created every hour
  • By 2006, 10 million people were listening to podcasts in 2006; by 2010, it's expected to be 50 million people
  • About 100 million videos are viewed every day on YouTube; about 65,000 videos uploaded every day
  • In 2006, MySpace had over 100 million registered members, most of them from the U.S.
5 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Understanding the 1% Who Influence the Rest of Us
  By Craig | new york, NY January 2, 2007 01:55:04 pm:
It is that 1% that tends to lead the flock. The power of the web has given that 1% who care to voice their opinion the ability to now amplify that opinion to the masses. Most people don't "get" the strength of the web and how influential it is on the collective consciousness. Even as they read they don't figure that 2 million others are also reading. Its surprising how uninspired most people are to chime in on these sites. I google myself and see that im one of these people who speaks up and if you go through some of the more popular comment sites you will see a reoccurring trend of the same people voicing their opinions. Just because the mike is open doesnt mean everyone is going to step up and speak, or even have what to say. The 1% that does have finally found their stage. Identify that one percent and figure out how they work and you got a secret weapon.
  By MLC102306 | Fitchburg, MA January 2, 2007 03:32:14 pm:
Privacy is an important issue for a lot of people or so it would appear. I think the internet is still in the early stages of people figuring out what they feel comfortable revealing. So maybe 1% does influence the masses and how was the figure determined? How do we know that is a true statement? It would certainly make our jobs easier as marketers if it were in fact true. I consider myself an independent and thoughtful thinker. I believe a lot of people think of themselves as that or at least I would like to think so.
  By sean | toronto, ON January 2, 2007 05:10:00 pm:
Bart,

Thanks for the pickup on the 1% rule. It is the fundamental notion of waht we do - word of mouth, good product innovation, powerful marketing insght and successful communication...bust two bits of minor clarity --it's Ben McConnell and Moffitt has two ts. Otherwise, great stuff and the comments see supportive but bring up interesting follow ups too - is it the same 1% for each category (no), can you find them easily (yes and no) and how can your prove it (jackie and ben have done more work on it then me..but I'm coinvinced)
  By Ben | Chicago, IL January 2, 2007 06:09:50 pm:
Bart -- Thanks for the summary of our work into the 1% Rule and the 1 Percenters (all of which is part of our book "Citizen Marketers.")

Smaller agencies probably have a better chance of making inroads into social media because of smaller chains of command or more pliable cultures. The biggest hurdle is just getting people to create something, like their own blog or Flickr account.

To understand a bit more about the 1 Percenters and their motivations for getting involved with content creation, this blog post explains more:

http://customerevangelists.typepad.com/blog/2006/07/understanding_t.html

BrandWeek ran a lengthy excerpt from "Citizen Marketers" a few weeks back, too:

http://www.brandweek.com/bw/magazine/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003467649

Michelle -- We hypothesized the 1% Rule based on data provided to us from a broad array of community-centric websites. The 1% Rule is a central tenent of "Citizen Marketers," which provides additional analysis and detailed data.

  By Bcleveland | Albuquerque, NM January 3, 2007 02:09:53 pm:
Sean, Ben:
Sorry for the lack proofing skills. I don't know where Jim came from. At least Jackie got through unscathed.
:

Note: Comments submitted to AdAge.com are posted automatically and will include the user name with which you registered. Ad Age reserves the right to delete comments that are insulting or personal in nature. Comments may be used in the print edition at editorial discretion. Comments are restricted to 500 words or less.




Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News