November 25, 2009
Login | Register Now

Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News


More from Ad Age:
Creativity
Ad Age China
Bookstore
Jobs
Ad Age On Campus
Sign up for E-mail Newsletters

Stay on top of the news, sign up for our free newsletters


Is the New-Media Mix too Mixed?

Unfocused Nontraditional Media Efforts Can Waste Time, Money

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Google Share on StumbleUpon Submit to LinkedIn Add to Newsvine Bookmark on Del.icio.us Submit to Reddit

Marc Brownstein Marc Brownstein
I'm all for exploring new media. In fact, I've built my agency around it. But I do feel that, at times, the rush to place messages in nontraditional places in a flight from TV, newspaper, radio, magazines and billboards has gotten a little out of hand.

It's not the creative application/placement of the media that I question; rather, it's the ability to focus media dollars and make an impact for a clients' brand. Small agencies are tasked with doing more with less on a daily basis for our clients. We are also guardians of their precious marketing dollars (especially so in a recession). So when a new campaign is launched that has six or seven media vehicles, I wonder how well we are making an impact.

Sure, urinal cakes are a cool vehicle for an advertising message. So is the ceiling of a subway car (cleverly named a "Michelangelo"). The walls of a parking garage. Sidewalk chalk. Body paint. Motion-activated displays. Public relations stunts. I could go on. But you see where I'm going with this. There are untold new and emerging media vehicles out there. And advertisers and their agencies are quickly moving money to them. Question is: do they work? Has brand awareness increased commensurate with the marketing goal?

In an effort to prevent doing something new just for newness' sake, we need to take a time out and carefully evaluate where advertising and public relations is going. It's the lack of focus, more than anything, that I worry about. For example, if a client with a limited budget tries to reach college students by placing its marketing dollars in on-campus events, direct mail, online media, concert sponsorships and interactive outdoor ads, would that same client be better served by concentrating the advertising in just two media? Marketing plans that are a mile wide but an inch deep serve no one's best interests -- except for the various media companies.

Every week, Brownstein Group has media companies calling on us (and our media planning partners) and introducing us to their latest, innovative advertising vehicle. Some truly are smart. Most will add to media dilution.

So I propose that when we create new work, we carefully think through the various and sundry media options and not dive in and commit to a mix that is, frankly, too mixed. Better to breakthrough and generate results, eh? Here are a few guidelines to work with:
  • For media budgets under $2 million that must reach more than a local audience, apply the same discipline with the media choices that you do with the message. Keep them single-minded as best you can.

  • Own a medium. The fast-feeder, Chick-fil-A, has done this quite effectively by dominating outdoor advertising. On the other hand, if you want to reach 19-year-old, beer-drinking males, then a nationwide urinal-cake ad buy may make sense.

  • Resist the urge to be the first on a new advertising vehicle. If the vehicle is a strategic no-brainer, then by all means, do it. If not, there are no medals for being the first advertiser to try something. Often, there is just more waste.

  • Put metrics in place for measurement. That will force you to make the right decisions.
9 Comments
Subscribe to comments on: Is the New-Media Mix too Mixed?
  By hlevenson | Ridgefield Park, NJ April 23, 2008 03:29:53 pm:
Amen. I think the same applies to online social media & networks like Facebook. For some demographics, it's a perfect venue - but not because campaigns are the first, because they are relevant. Follow this philosophy and your media budgets are spent more strategically and you may even reach your targets & ROI goals...
  By Tom Martin | NEW ORLEANS, LA April 23, 2008 04:06:12 pm:
Marc,

Very interesting point...a counter point to consider.

By "owning" a channel you risk ad message wear out. How many times have you seen the same ad over and over and over to the point that you just tune it out?

There is something to be said for placing a bit of media in all the channels the target audience consumes. You have more opportunity to be seen, less likely to hit the wear out threshold quickly and for smaller advertisers, can make them appear to be bigger/more robust.

In the end, it would seem that the best approach is based on the marketing goals and risk/reward limit of the client.

www.tommartin.typepad.com
  By curtissgt | NEW YORK, NY April 23, 2008 04:15:48 pm:
Some great points.
Do me a favor, let me know the names of the agencies with the guts to present a national urinal cake campaign, I need to talk to them. I would argue that the mile wide media plan comes from agencies not comfortable with parting with traditional media, even if it makes sense. New media gets thrown a bone, when in fact they may actually deserve the TV slice of the pie, but end up with the scraps.
  By hkopec | CHICAGO, IL April 23, 2008 04:27:30 pm:
Interesting "19-year-old, beer-drinking males" isn't the legal drinking age 21? Who's the client?
  By jessicacramer519 | Toledo, OH April 23, 2008 04:42:00 pm:
Consider also those mediums that you already own like your website, your telephone system and your office building. Those people who already call, click or visit are your most important audience. Those people are the 20% of customers who generate 80% of business. And there's no "airtime" to buy and no commission to pay.
  By Jillian | Howell, NJ April 24, 2008 10:01:44 am:
Piggybacking on Howard Levenson's comment, I'll report that I've seen brands decide to include MySpace or Facebook in a reco simply because it's free... sure, creating a page is free, but to make it work for the brand costs money, both actual and in labour costs. This is a good lesson to apply to any media -- "if it's free it's for me" is not a strategic way of approaching media vehicles and advertising. Sure there is the opportunity for more eyeballs to see a brand's message... but at what cost? And at what value?

Jconochan@ms3marketing.com
  By csmithem | Summerville, SC April 24, 2008 10:51:43 am:
Marc's points are very well made. Working with clients in the small agency setting requires discipline when planning media buys. I've had many ask about social media, but not want to spend the time to maintain. I do believe in owning one medium, perhaps in one day part. In order to not wear out the audience, use varied messages all supporting the brand and campaign. Use a complementary vehicle to carry the message in another channel.

However, if all you are seeking is awareness there is something to be said for using an number of different vehicles. If you want action from the consumer, better concentrate.
  By Kevin | Chicago, IL April 24, 2008 12:45:10 pm:
Hey urinal cakes for a Viagra or a condom company can make sense, don't you think? But rubber stamping media plans with the same old stuff is just as big a waste. When will agencies stop buying media on "numbers alone." If I'm a pharmaceutical company or even a CPG with a health message, wouldn't reaching consumers in the waiting rooms of their doctors' offices make sense?
  By John | Cumberland, ME April 24, 2008 07:34:25 pm:
Like everything else, it varies case by case. Beyond looking at CPM's and media costs, it's also worthwhile to consider production costs as well as the cost of splintering the marketing department and agency into a multitude of pursuits. If 20% of creative energies are being spent on a new medium delivering only 5% of total communications impact, would those energies have been better spent on producing better creative product in the more traditional media? The answer varies case by case.



Stay on top of the news and stay ahead of the game—sign up for e-mail newsletters now!



Advertising Age: Your Online Source for Marketing and Media News