The ruling in Manhattan is a victory for Fubo, which argues that the new venture—set to start Aug. 23—would prevent competitors from offering a similar “skinny bundle” of sports channels and raise prices for consumers. Fubo says its business would be destroyed if subscribers flee to Venu.
The judge sided with Fubo, saying that once the proposed streaming service launches, it will “have no reason to take actions that could allow for the emergence of direct competitors.”
Fubo shares surged as much as 22% on Friday, their biggest intraday gain in more than a year. Still, the stock has been on a steady decline since January, losing more than 50% of its value.
Spokespeople for Venu and Fubo didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Losing users
The new service comes as more and more viewers have jettisoned increasingly costly cable and satellite TV packages in favor of lower-priced alternatives.
The pay-TV industry lost almost 30 million users from 2015 to 2023 and could shed another 6 million by the end of the year, according to a report on Venu by Bloomberg Intelligence. Industry leader ESPN, controlled by Disney, has seen its subscriber count fall to 71 million last year from 100 million in 2010.
Fubo sued Fox, Warner and Disney in February, right after they announced they were joining forces to launch Venu. The company argued the trio was using their control of valuable rights to major sporting events to assert control over the market. Fubo claimed they were forcing rivals to license and distribute a big bundle of less popular general entertainment channels if they wanted to carry networks such as ESPN and Fox.