Lincoln had his team of rivals. John and Paul had their creative differences in the Beatles. Record producer Rick Rubin has worked with various strange bedfellows who share differing cultural views. And we’ve all come to learn how Oppenheimer harnessed divergent perspectives to build an innovative team that changed the world.
A dynamic at the core of these partnerships is proactive disagreement, the practice of constructively pitting differing points of view against each other to inspire enhanced creativity.
Agencies, too, contain integrated teams that bring different skill sets to the table, including data analytics, consumer insights and creative ideas that move and persuade people. When presented with a client brief, an agency collectively attacks it from different angles, often differing on the approach and disagreeing on the solution. There is tension and dissension—and that's healthy. Few muscles, including creative ones, are strengthened without some form of discomfort.
What follows such proactive disagreements are creative sparks and surprising solutions. Yet organizations and people often want more immediate consensus. They seek to find a unifying ground that moves the project forward comfortably. But therein lies the danger because once you have consensus, thinking stops. And once the thinking stops, ideas stagnate.