’Tis the season to ... lay people off?
If you work at any of the big networks or holding companies, you’ll know that late in the fourth quarter is the time when agency CFOs are under pressure to make sure all margins are met by year’s end.
And for the past several years agencies have mastered the art of “rolling layoffs,” an alternative to major cuts after an account is lost or a big client slashes their budget. Inexperienced agency management often kicks the can down the road rather than quickly and decisively reacting to reduced budgets. Then December arrives, their CFO knocks on the door and suddenly they realize that Santa isn’t the only one left holding the bag.
The theory of micro cuts is that an agency can reduce staff in a series of tiny pullbacks to avoid the news of layoffs hitting the trade press, where it might tarnish the agency’s reputation. Part of the justification is that big cuts traumatize an agency culture, but rolling layoffs are more like little waves of sadness—they make people queasy, but soon they shake it off and get back to work.
In practice, however, that’s not how it works at all. For people working at agencies who can’t manage their margins, the business has become a never-ending “Squid Game” in which even the best talent is wondering whose head is going to roll across the floor next.
Let’s put this in perspective.
Once upon a time, when advertising was the magical world of misfit toys, getting laid off involved a conversation between adults about the reality of the business—a lost pitch or cheap client—followed by a tough decision about cutting staff. The person on the chopping block was treated like a valued member of the family, with hopes they’d one day return. They had a heads-up, were given a reasonable date of departure and were usually supported on their quest to find the next gig.