At the same time, if an agency proposes the use of AI, brands will likely argue that the agency must stand behind any vendor it brings to the table. Given that most agency-client agreements don’t directly address issues such as AI, both parties should decide how they should be restructured going forward.
Have creative AI output undergo legal review
While generative AI may be an excellent way to create new concepts or even finished products, they still need legal review.
Generally, the inspiration for content from a team of creatives can be compared to the finished product to determine whether the final product is clear or an infringement. The difficult thing about conducting a legal review on AI-generated materials is that it is not known what inspired the content created, thereby presenting inherent risk.
That being said, there are some tools that can be used to help. For example, a finished image can be run through Google’s reverse image search—to see if it is too similar to something else that’s already out on the internet. If you are creating models via generative AI, there are platforms that will allow you to compare your models against pictures of similar real people that exist on the internet.
Notably, while it was initially thought that AI-generated content might run counter to Google’s search engine guidelines, its rules don’t outright prohibit AI-generated content, but rather prohibit only “spammy automatically-generated content that has been generated programmatically without producing anything original or adding sufficient value.”
Set a baseline for your employees, agencies, vendors and freelancers
Obviously, AI will be used in the creation of advertising materials going forward; we cannot put the genie back in the bottle. But brands and agencies must be sure to first evaluate possible risks and disclose its use in marketing materials.
So, a baseline rule for all should be that AI cannot be used without disclosure and approval. This rule applies to anyone working on behalf of a brand or agency, including employees, vendors, freelancers and other independent contractors—who might be using these technologies without disclosing them, thereby exposing companies to unknown risks.