Pum Lefebure
Co-Founder and Chief Creative Officer
Design Army
The minute I saw the logo, it brought back childhood memories of a bubbly frizzy Pepsi … in a glass bottle in the ’80s! Growing up in Thailand, my mom would always have ice-chilled bottles of Pepsi in the fridge, and we would have to pop them open with a bottle opener and always drink them with a straw. This new logo has just enough retro to “recall” a specific time, without being too specific. I like it when a brand embraces its heritage and draws inspiration from it. A facelift is a good thing when you can still recognize the person.
Pepsi is making their classic current. The overall branding feels like Gen X meets the metaverse. Like a bro keeping up with the times—and that’s a good thing. To me, the brand has a sports-meets-gaming feel. It does lean a little masculine in a non-binary world, due to the color. Since color has meaning both physiologically and culturally, the black-and-blue combo feels more macho. However, I happen to love a cobalt blue and black color combination. It says bold, confident, and unapologetic.
Overall, I like it. The branding is confident, and it doesn’t care if you like it back or not. The globe goes BIG—that’s the biggest circle you can fit on a can—and the typography brings the BOLD with all-caps and a short x-height, putting the PEPSI wordmark front and center, unlike the previous logo. The white outline treatment will allow the logo to be applied to practically anything and is friendly to use. The logo also passes the emoji test with ease. It works well as a tiny digital expression or on a giant billboard. The logo has legs because of its simplicity.
I would love to see this logo in a glass bottle again. Would be very on-brand to grab a bottle of Pepsi from the cooler, like in the old days. It would be very badass if the liquid color of the new Pepsi Zero was pitch black, instead of brown, to match the new branding.
Hamish Campbell
Executive Creative Director
Pearlfisher
Welcome back Pepsi.
This rebrand makes me smile, probably the way Pepsi should. But not quite a leap for joy. In time, it might.
I feel Pepsi has always struggled and been a bit schizophrenic with their identity over the years, especially if you chart their logo history—it’s been a wild journey. From the previous version, the offset nature didn’t feel right for a brand with the stature of Pepsi. I also could never unsee the “overweight character” with a large belly hanging out from under their shirt.
Maybe I’m being charmed by the nostalgia but building from the ’70s and ’80s feels right for Pepsi, without being an overtly nostalgia play. I appreciate their return of confidence with a bold and unapologetic stance. Getting back to what they know—and what consumers know—behaving like a true iconic brand. Which they are.
If I’m my most critical, I do like the new bold wordmark, but there is something a little off with how it sits together with the globe. I wish some of the characters had a better relationship with the wave, and the sharp cut on top of the “I” is a tad uncomfortable—but these are small things. I love how they are embracing the darker rich blues and interchangeable radiating rings that have the potential to give the brand flexibility and a modern freshness.
The best iconic work comes from depth, symbolism and authenticity, and I can see this being reflected in the new identity. Looking back to move forward can be powerful and effective, drawing from their authentic self, connected to the symbolism of a balanced—yin yang like—world, or just simply carbonated bubbles. It works for me, and I think it will prove its success over time.
Andy Cooke
Creative Director and Head of Design
BBH London
In timely Pepsi manner, another identity refresh lands right on cue. The usual and logical 2020s reasoning of a logo being fit-for-digital makes sense, but I can’t help but feel they’ve missed an opportunity in not going fully in on their visual equity from the past. Burger King did and did it well—whereas Pepsi’s one foot in the future dilutes it all a bit.
The type is a tad awkward, but I can see what they were trying to do. The return to the globe is good, but it’s yet another version of it. The strong association with music at a brand level potentially puts them in a corner, too.
While it’s better than the 2008 rendition, I can already see a 2038 refresh on the cards.