Meta’s executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, recently talked about the automation revolution during a second-quarter earnings call with Wall Street analysts; Meta reported $38.3 billion in ad revenue for the period, a 22 percent increase year over year. Ad impressions and the cost for the impressions are rising, too, thanks to improved AI, according to Meta. Ad impressions across the family of Meta apps, and the cost per thousand impressions, were both up 10% year over year. The average cost per impression was down 16% year over year.
“AI is also going to significantly evolve our services for advertisers,” Zuckerberg said in the latest earnings call, adding “it used to be that advertisers came to us with a specific audience they wanted to reach, like a certain age group, geography, or interests.”
“But today advertisers still need to develop creative themselves. In the coming years, AI will be able to generate creative for advertisers as well and will also be able to personalize it as people see it,” Zuckerberg said. “Over the long term, advertisers will basically just be able to tell us a business objective and a budget, and we’re going to go do the rest for them. We’re going to get there incrementally over time, but I think this is going to be a very big deal.”
Ground truth
Today’s announcements were steps in that direction. Perhaps the most significant update was the integration of Meta’s ad manager with the third-party data, starting with Google Analytics and Northbeam. Meta also plans to include Adobe Analytics and Triple Lift as third-party data sources. These are analytics services that marketers already work with to get a fuller picture around all their media spend across platforms. By tying this data to their Meta ad manager, that could improve Meta’s reporting about which campaigns worked and how well they worked. The data also could help Meta’s ad system become smarter for future campaigns.
For advertisers, the analytics are key for improving measurement on Meta. For instance, Javy Coffee, which spends about $3 million a month on Meta ads, uses Northbeam as its analytics provider, and it is more accurate than the data from Meta’s ad platform, according to Matt Faber, head of growth at Javy Coffee, a direct-to-consumer brand. Reporting within Meta can be “quite inaccurate” when it comes to metrics around customer acquisition costs and ad measurements, Faber said. Now, that Northbeam’s data is plugged into the mix, it’s easier to adjust campaign setting on Meta to get better results, Faber said.
“Media buying is all decision-making,” Faber said. “So if you’re putting money behind, you know, things that are not actually working, then you're not going to have any success. So, when you look at Facebook's reporting and compared to Northbeam, it's a night and day difference.”
The analytic improvements are meant to enable to advertisers to use their preferred source of “ground truth,” Meta’s Leach said.