David Berkowitz |
After a late 2008 growth spurt, FriendFeed's audience leveled off, according to Compete data, hitting 902,000 unique visitors in January 2009 and attracting 918,000 in July 2009. During the same span in 2009, Compete says Facebook added 54 million U.S. visitors. That growth has led a lot of marketers to ignore FriendFeed, and it's hard to blame them for fishing where the fish are.
Aggregating social identities
It's a shame, though, because FriendFeed is a valuable service, and
it will only be more valuable as consumers participate with more
social-media properties. On FriendFeed, users can aggregate updates
from 58 services including Facebook, Twitter, Digg, SlideShare,
Pandora and Amazon. Those users can follow each other across the
range of those services to get all of their updates in one
place.
Another
View:
Is
FriendFeed Facebook's Twitter Killer?Ian Schafer: This Move Is About Social-Media Conversations |
For marketers, aggregating identities is just one part of the value. Some have used it well, such as the Travel Channel, which pulls in updates from six different services, including Delicious, Digg and Mixx. The New York Times has also used it well, reaching nearly 1,600 followers -- but a mere one-thousandth of the reach it has through its main Twitter account.
The bigger part of FriendFeed is its search functionality. A marketer, without even registering on the site, can search every FriendFeed user's updates from the site's home page. It's not a fully representative search, as FriendFeed reaches only a niche audience. But it can be a great way to search users' updates across dozens of services so that the marketer won't wind up searching each network individually. Marketers have a hard enough time remembering to search Twitter, so this is a great way to get a taste of what certain consumers are talking about.