Dr. Mehmet Oz is firing back at charges he's shilling for the NFL at a time when the country's richest, most powerful sports league is struggling with medical, legal and image problems from the player-concussion issue.
The host of the syndicated "Dr. Oz Show" described as "unfair" a Los Angeles Times column accusing him of "shamelessly shilling for the NFL." The column, written by Michael Hiltzik, was a response to a 30-second spot aired during football games over the weekend. Part of a campaign in which celebrities and others discuss their connection to football, Dr. Oz, a former high school and college football player, describes football as a "rite of passage" that helped his teen son Oliver "grow up." He recalls his pride when the announcer called his son's first game tackle.
Mr. Hiltzik, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, wrote it was a new low for Dr. Oz to endorse the NFL without adding a "cautionary disclaimer" on the risk from traumatic head injuries. Just how blistering the column was becomes clear in the lead paragraph: "Medical experts realized long ago that there's no point in guessing how low Dr. Mehmet Oz will sink in pushing patent cures, fad diets and unproven health "miracles" on his Oprah-produced TV show. But his appearance this weekend in an NFL promotional campaign looks like some sort of a milestone."
That's bunk, countered Dr. Oz in an interview Tuesday night from Chicago where he spoke at a football safety clinic for the mothers of high school players hosted by the Chicago Bears and NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.
First, Dr. Oz said he doesn't endorse anything, period. All the products he supposedly endorses on the Web are phonies. Second, he called the NFL himself about the "opportunity to save brains" before the league asked him to appear in its year-long "Together We Make Football—Your Story" ad campaign. That campaign has also featured appearances from Condoleezza Rice, Rob Lowe, L.L. Cool J, Whoopi Goldberg, Joe Montana and child football phenomenon Samantha Gordon. Third, he didn't think it was possible to inject a "disclaimer" into a 30-second commercial. He agreed to appear, said Dr. Oz, because he "has a passion" for the game and, like many parents, had a "difficult decision" to make about allowing his son to play high school football.
"Of all the stories I could tell about football, it was one that might be most relevant to a lot of folks who are at home making the same kind of decision," he said. "But it wasn't a paid endorsement. I didn't have a reason to do it besides, quite frankly, I have an affinity for the game."
From a practical standpoint, he wants to know how he could insert a "disclaimer" into a TV spot. All the spots were shot by the league's NFL Films. "All this pent-up rage about my need to put a disclaimer in. How do you put a disclaimer in a 22-second piece about something that you like doing?"
The NFL says it has not received one complaint about Oz spot. "The next one would be the first," said spokesman Brian McCarthy.
The NFL compensated Dr. Oz and the other celebrities appearing in the campaign with a $20,000 donation to the charity of their choice and two tickets to Super Bowl XLVIII on Feb. 2, 2014 at MetLife Stadium, according to league spokeswoman Joanna Hunter.
But Dr. Oz said he was not aware of any compensation until afterwards. He's asked the NFL to give the money straight to HealthCorps, a health and fitness charity he helped found in 2003. An avid NFL fan, he frequently attends the Super Bowl. As a New Jersey resident who lives near MetLife Stadium, he's looking forward to taking his son to the first Super Bowl to be played at an outdoor stadium during cold weather months.