Because the Super Bowl is sold on unit price rather than audience guarantee, Mulvihill said there was no financial impact for Fox or Super Bowl advertisers. Rather, “the impact is mostly just about our pride in our bragging rights and having the No. 1 show of all time,” said Mulvihill.
Even with 115.1 million viewers tuning in to see the Kansas City Chiefs defeat the Philadelphia Eagles in a tense 38-35 matchup, it wasn't the most-watched event ever. In the U.S. that title appears to still be firmly held by the Apollo 11 moon landing, broadcast across multiple networks on July 20, 1969. NASA suggests that 650 million people tuned in worldwide. (Other tallies pin U.S. viewership at a somewhat closer to Earth 125 to 150 million people.)
The gulf between Nielsen and iSpot
Nielsen’s revisions appear to narrow the reporting gulf between the company and rival iSpot.tv, which reported an average minute audience of 118.2 million for the Super Bowl audiences. Previously, iSpot showed a 4.6% bigger audience than Nielsen. Now, the gap is only 2.7%.
But the gulf between the two was actually broader in terms of in-home and out-of-home audiences. According to information from Nielsen, its out-of-home audience for the game was 20.8 million, which is nearly 27% higher than iSpot’s at 16.4 million. When it comes to in-home measurement, however, iSpot data appears to be 8% higher than Nielsen’s number, at 101.8 million vs. 94.3 million for Nielsen.
A spokesman for iSpot said the company didn't publicly release any Super Bowl audience number revisions because its cross-platform measurements "were within a small margin of error" when streaming and linear data were retabulated.
The news comes on the heels of Nielsen announcing it would return to trading on panel-based data during this year’s upfront, upending expectations that it would debut its big data offering in time for negotiations. Nielsen’s announcement renewed years-long concern about the ability of Nielsen’s panel size to accurately capture viewership, particularly as it recently refused to participate in the industry’s latest effort to standardize measurement via the U.S. Joint Industry Committee.