Unilever Plc’s internal dispute with Ben & Jerry’s is heating up again as the Vermont-based ice cream maker disavowed the products sold under its brand in Israel.
Ben & Jerry’s independent board criticized parent company Unilever’s decision to allow sales under the brand in West Bank settlements via a third party. The comments, made Tuesday in a statement shared exclusively with Bloomberg, mark the first time Ben & Jerry’s has spoken about the matter publicly since filing a lawsuit in a federal New York court in July.
“Ben & Jerry’s position is clear: the sale of products bearing any Ben & Jerry’s insignia in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is against our values,” the ice-cream maker’s board said. “Such sales are inconsistent with international law, fundamental human rights and Ben & Jerry’s social mission.”
Unilever is in the tricky position of being sued by its premium ice cream unit, which it has allowed to pursue socially progressive causes via an independent board. Last year, the independent board publicly pledged to stop sales of Ben & Jerry’s in the occupied West Bank, citing human rights, economic and social justice concerns. Unilever decided to go over the board’s head and sell the Ben & Jerry’s business in Israel to a local producer of the ice cream.